Eggers brought that back in style with Nosferatu.I assume Nolan's going the same route as Ridley Scott here.
I.e. **** accents. It's all make-believe.
Eggers brought that back in style with Nosferatu.
Tenet is a 10/10 masterpiece. Criminally underrated. My hottest Nolan take is that it is leaps and bounds better than Inception.
Tenet is a cool as **** vibes movie, aesthetically gorgeous with a bunch of really fun performances. It’s also a great, more cynical counterpoint to Interstellar thematically.The unfortunate thing about Tenet is that it kinda rules.
I wish all Nolan movies had Travis Scott's The Plan playing in the background.
We want what we want; but do we really think Nolan is going to be copying special effects from the 60's?I want this to be the most expensive Harryhausen movie ever made.
That's right.Tenet is a 10/10 masterpiece. Criminally underrated. My hottest Nolan take is that it is leaps and bounds better than Inception.
Knowing Nolan, if he chooses not to rely on CGI for what creatures could pop up, makeup, stopmotion and/or animatronics can do the trick. The latter two really aren't outdated, just more underutilized nowadays. Heck, Skeleton Crew recently used stopmotion and it looked great.
That's great for Skeleton Crew, but 'someone else did it' is exactly why I think Nolan won't do that. I think he'd attempt something way more outside-the-box or innovative than that.Knowing Nolan, if he chooses not to rely on CGI for what creatures could pop up, makeup, stopmotion and/or animatronics can do the trick. The latter two really aren't outdated, just more underutilized nowadays. Heck, Skeleton Crew recently used stopmotion and it looked great.
I mean, it's either stop motion, animatronics or CGI. Not sure what other innovations are out there for a creature like Scylla.
Is it, though? I don't know if he'll invent anything "revolutionary", but Nolan being Nolan, he (and his VFX team) would find a way to do it that wouldn't be so straightforward, I think. -- That is, assuming that the creatures are even in the film in a significant way; which I still have my doubts about. (Again, Nolan being Nolan.)Short of inventing a groundbreaking new technique that's gonna be revolutionary for cinema, those are the only options he has.
If he ends up mentioning Ray Harryhausen as an influence for Odyssey in interviews, it would more or less confirm that he'd at least consider using stop-motion for the creature effects.
I don't think he'll necessarily do away with the mythological aspects. I just don't think he'll present them in a way everyone seems to expect (outside of his style); a way that's already been done. I could see the creatures as being more metaphorical than literal, maybe.I mean, I still disagree with your opinion of him doing away with the mythological aspects of the poem. I could maybe see him taking the similar approach that Ridley Scott did with Exodus: Gods and Kings, but I'd personally find that severely underwhelming and uninteresting.