Sawyer
17 and AFRAID of Sabrina Carpenter
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2004
- Messages
- 114,563
- Reaction score
- 28,055
- Points
- 203
Nothing, but you know how we be.What's wrong with Michael Seresin?
Nothing, but you know how we be.What's wrong with Michael Seresin?
"In an ideal world – a world without the perception that negative is uneconomic or passé – both Reeves and Seresin would have shot film for this piece almost on principal. However, when the studio insisted on digital, Seresin ran tests on several cameras in search of the one that would give him the best chance of attaining Reeves' dark vision."I think Reeves prefers digital cameras. I believe there's little reason to shoot on film, if so much stuff is done digitally these days, and the final result is made into a digital master. There are guys like Nolan who utilize shooting on film and post production involves chemical process. But it's not Reeves. Apes are digital productions through and through.
I personally stopped caring about analog. Digital cameras today are super-capable and versatile. There are numerous tests that digital camera are capable of producing image indistinguishable from 35mm film. Specialists claim Arri 65, despite smaller frame, can capture even more detail than 15 perf IMAX that we love to watch in Nolan movies. Today the main difference isn't the look, but the process.
Well, Cloverfield was a JJ Abrams production left on the hands of Matt Reeves. It's quite possible that JJ advised him to use digital to save the limited budget. Plus I doubt Reeves cared that much about how that film looked as long as it always looked handheld. That film wasn't exactly the type to be filled with beautiful shots.So it's not his decision. I thought he sticks to digital out of personal preference. Starting with Cloverfield, with exception of Let Me In...
So if he prefers film, then people who want film have a chance.
Considering it's a found footage movie and SD material is very substantial in the film, it was probably more of an artistic decision, rather than budgetary. Or both.Well, Cloverfield was a JJ Abrams production left on the hands of Matt Reeves. It's quite possible that JJ advised him to use digital to save the limited budget
They're trying so hard to be Blade Runner 2049Pikachu looks ugly and glossy IMO.
So the cinematographer for Detective Pikachu is John Mathieson, the same one that did Man from UNCLE, Logan, Hannibal, etc.
Not too crazy for him but he could work, I guess.
I know Harris Savides is dead, but I would kill for a Batman movie that looks like The Game
And Fincher’s aesthetic obviously suits Batman down to the ground.
Highly possible, but it's not like he's worked with the guy consistently across his entire filmography.Do you guys think Reeves will use the same cinematographer from the Apes movies?
