Ben_Reilly
Civilian
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2016
- Messages
- 531
- Reaction score
- 83
- Points
- 53
I found it very lacking.
It seemed to me to not really care about anything from the Parker comics, and mostly seemed to be nothing more than a version of Parker transplanted into Miles' story.
Obviously Ned Leeds was Ganke
Pete didn't even seem all that smart. All he did was make web fluid and web shooters.
The lack of Uncle Ben (yes, I know it wasn't supposed to be an origin, but it kind of was in a sense...) even being mentioned "You know what May has been through..." so Ben's death doesn't really seem to matter to Pete.
Pete's motives changed constantly...
I wanna be an Avenger... Give me a mission
I need to prove myself to be an Avenger...
I'll show Tony that I belong on the Avengers Roster...
F**k Tony, I'll be Spider-Man anyway...
I don' want to be an Avenger, not for a while anyway...
Then, one of the most iconic scenes from the comics was utterly neutered!
Peter being trapped under the rubble...
At the moment of triumph, they don't even bother showing him lifting it and throwing it off. They cut to the rubble and it casually just dropping away.
If anything, we should have seen the rubble first and then watched as Pete lifted it up.
And let's not forget, that Tony was the motivating factor for his surge of strength, not the fact that May would be devestated. No, it was just proving Tony wrong. Such a crock of *****!
I also do not understand the whole car scene reactions that people are having.
How was it tense? How was it scary? Peter has powers. Toomes does not. There was no tension, no threat. Nothing.
And not to mention all the PC crap.
The film opened with a PC exchange and then lied about one later on. The Washington Monument was not built by slaves.
This was easily, for me, the worst MCU film.
It even may be my least favourite Spider-Man movie!
It seemed to me to not really care about anything from the Parker comics, and mostly seemed to be nothing more than a version of Parker transplanted into Miles' story.
Obviously Ned Leeds was Ganke
Pete didn't even seem all that smart. All he did was make web fluid and web shooters.
The lack of Uncle Ben (yes, I know it wasn't supposed to be an origin, but it kind of was in a sense...) even being mentioned "You know what May has been through..." so Ben's death doesn't really seem to matter to Pete.
Pete's motives changed constantly...
I wanna be an Avenger... Give me a mission
I need to prove myself to be an Avenger...
I'll show Tony that I belong on the Avengers Roster...
F**k Tony, I'll be Spider-Man anyway...
I don' want to be an Avenger, not for a while anyway...
Then, one of the most iconic scenes from the comics was utterly neutered!
Peter being trapped under the rubble...
At the moment of triumph, they don't even bother showing him lifting it and throwing it off. They cut to the rubble and it casually just dropping away.
If anything, we should have seen the rubble first and then watched as Pete lifted it up.
And let's not forget, that Tony was the motivating factor for his surge of strength, not the fact that May would be devestated. No, it was just proving Tony wrong. Such a crock of *****!
I also do not understand the whole car scene reactions that people are having.
How was it tense? How was it scary? Peter has powers. Toomes does not. There was no tension, no threat. Nothing.
And not to mention all the PC crap.
The film opened with a PC exchange and then lied about one later on. The Washington Monument was not built by slaves.
This was easily, for me, the worst MCU film.
It even may be my least favourite Spider-Man movie!
Last edited: