The Amazing Spider-Man Could SM4 Be the End

[SpeterMan3]

I want a Spider-Man that antagonizing his enemy and makes witty one-liners. I also want them to add some new moves to his inventory. Even if it's something Spidey has never done before.

 

[SpaceWay2009]

Impact webbing was in the second one, used against bank robbers, and the third one, used against "New Goblin" in the first fight of the movie.

And honestly, new webbing tricks are kinda dumb to me. It doesn't make sense that he has organic web, shooting only out of his wrists, but can somehow shape them into different stuff, or make it thicker or thinner. They tried to explain this gimmick in the comics by saying stuff like Peter would triple-tap his web-shooter button, or use a different web formula, or something. But how do you explain it in the movie universe where he makes the web already.

Impact webbing is enough. Spider-Man was never about the gadgets, leave that stuff to Batman and Ironman. Next people will want to see the "spider-signal" or "spider-tracers." Why not the "spider-mobile?" Lame.

That's true. But in an attempt to explain how he can be creative with his organic webbing, it can be explained that Spider-Man can make any shapes/sizes just by the use of his mind. If he needs/wants to make a big spider net, he can do it. But anyway, I wouldn't mind seeing it or not. Just a thought.

 

[Crazy Flakes]

I don't know about it being the end, but I sure hope they're able to fix up the mess that was Spiderman 3.

 

[VenomVsSpidey]

I don't know about it being the end, but I sure hope they're able to fix up the mess that was Spiderman 3.

:facepalm

 

[LightningFlash]

Wow....you have that stupid picard because...what, you don't think they need to fix up the mess?

Because, yah, they do.

Spider-Man 3 SUCKED.

Raimi needs to do a movie that is 50 times better.

 

[Spider-ManHero12]

^^ We all have our different opinions. Wasn't fact that Spider-Man 3 was bad, it was an opinion. I liked Spider-Man 3, and so did alot of other people.

 

[SpeterMan3]

^^ We all have our different opinions. Wasn't fact that Spider-Man 3 was bad, it was an opinion. I liked Spider-Man 3, and so did alot of other people.

Right. It was bad or It was good is an opinion. It was flawed is fact. Our opinions are dependent on how we accept and/ or react to that fact.

 

[LightningFlash]

And flaws make a movie terrible.

Thus, it sucked.

And a LOT of people think it sucked more than thinking it was good.

 

[VenomVsSpidey]

wow....you have that stupid picard because...what, you don't think they need to fix up the mess?

Because, yah, they do.

Spider-man 3 sucked.

Raimi needs to do a movie that is 50 times better.

o-p-i-n-i-o-n.

 

[LightningFlash]

So you don't think Raimi shouldn't try to make a movie ten times better to make up for Spider-Man 3?

Because, sure, it made money, a lot of it, but look at its ratings. Too many villains, silly plot, useless retcon, poor dialogue on most of the Peter/MJ scenes....

yes, those flaws made the movie suck. And I'll still say it.

One day you might have a standard for movies.

 

[webhead731]

LightningFlash, as far as I know you haven't even seen the whole film yet, so there's no way you can keep enforcing your opinion as fact. You are trolling, stop telling us you didn't like the movie just because someone else says they do. We all know you didn't like it, and frankly no one cares. You saying that flaws make a movie bad is just ridiculous. I have not seen one flawless movie in my life. Stop being immature.

And as for the "ratings", you make it like it's ALL bad. I see more good than bad, usually people think it's good but not AS good as the first two. Just because you hate it doesn't mean everyone does. :facepalm

 

[TheScarecrow]

Spider-man 3 isn't a disaster. There are some amazing sequences in parts of it...the whole product though, isn't up to scratch. It feel very short of expectations. A lot of it was very inventive and if Raimi had made a couple of better decisions, it could have been quite good. Raimi doesn't need to 'make up' for Spider-man 3 - he just needs to make the best movie possible.

 

[VenomVsSpidey]

So you don't think Raimi shouldn't try to make a movie ten times better to make up for Spider-Man 3?

Because, sure, it made money, a lot of it, but look at its ratings. Too many villains, silly plot, useless retcon, poor dialogue on most of the Peter/MJ scenes....

yes, those flaws made the movie suck. And I'll still say it.

One day you might have a standard for movies.

sure dont. In My Opinion, spider-man 3 = Dark Knight.
remember MY OPINION, NOT YOURS.

 

[SpeterMan3]

Spider-man 3 isn't a disaster. There are some amazing sequences in parts of it...the whole product though, isn't up to scratch. It feel very short of expectations. A lot of it was very inventive and if Raimi had made a couple of better decisions, it could have been quite good. Raimi doesn't need to 'make up' for Spider-man 3 - he just needs to make the best movie possible.

 

[OcStat]

Damn, isn't this a forum for Spider-Man 4?

Who cares if you did or didn't like any of the last three movies, talk about that in the other forums...perhaps...oh I don't know, the ones designated for those films? It isn't like we haven't heard every single gripe about Spider-Man 3 a hundred times since May 4th, 2007.

Let's discuss the new movie. I know it might be hard to stick to it, considering we have next to no news yet, but it can be done folks.

 

[SpeterMan3]

You know, I didn't even know Tobey was pregnant.

Does that explain the mood swings? I thought it was just the symbiote...?

 

[SpeterMan3]

oops, wrong thread

 

[FaT_tONle]

Damn, isn't this a forum for Spider-Man 4?

Who cares if you did or didn't like any of the last three movies, talk about that in the other forums...perhaps...oh I don't know, the ones designated for those films? It isn't like we haven't heard every single gripe about Spider-Man 3 a hundred times since May 4th, 2007.

Let's discuss the new movie. I know it might be hard to stick to it, considering we have next to no news yet, but it can be done folks.

We still got two years? What else to talk about?

 

[Metal Spidey]

We still got two years? What else to talk about?

Agreed. It's not like we have too much to discuss about part 4 anyway.

 

[OcStat]

Well, it's been two years since Spider-Man 3, and I know there isn't much news to discuss yet, I think we can take the *****ing elsewhere.

 

[Spider-ManHero12]

And I'll still say it.

I don't think anybody cares. I'll say Spider-Man 3 was awesome.

 

[SP1D3RxV3N0M]

I don't think anybody cares. I'll say Spider-Man 3 was awesome.

 

[NewYorkSpider]

So you don't think Raimi shouldn't try to make a movie ten times better to make up for Spider-Man 3?

Because, sure, it made money, a lot of it, but look at its ratings. Too many villains, silly plot, useless retcon, poor dialogue on most of the Peter/MJ scenes....

yes, those flaws made the movie suck. And I'll still say it.

One day you might have a standard for movies.

I kinda hope you keep this up. I find it entertaining.

 

[venom892]

As entertaining as it is I find it to be true.Spider-man 3 was mediocre at best.

 

[NewYorkSpider]

As entertaining as it is I find it to be true.Spider-man 3 was mediocre at best.

I agree. It wasn't bad or good. It was a mediocre movie. What I find funny from LighningFlash, is that he hasn't seen the whole movie(said he fell asleep in the movie theater). Now he's criticizing the movie.