Mr 7000+ said:
There is no contradiction there. If your gay good for you, thats your business. I dont have any feeling of hate for you or anything like that because of your sexual orientation BUT I do think its wrong and if people want to accuse me of being prejudice then f--k them. Simple as.
Of course you don't hate me, but I still think as far as semantics go, that the statement you made was contradictory.
Mr 7000+ said:
If you are gay, yes.

Again, what you do is your business and if I were to meet you, I wouldn't mistreat you in anyway, I'd treat you how I'd treat any other person but my views on homosexuality are as I've stated.
Likewise.
Mr 7000+ said:
I'm fully aware of the types of sexual orientation that exist but your excuse to justify how sexuality "isn't that rigid" is pure and utter bs imo. Just because two men can screw each other it doesn't mean its right. Hell, you get people who have sex with animals, people who have sex with corpses but hey, just because people indulge in such activity doesn't mean its right and the same goes for homosexuality imo. I just want to make it clear to you and to anyone else that even though I am against homosexuality and believe it to be vile, sickening and down right disgusting, I bare no hatred or ill-feeling towards such people.
I love how people flout with absolute certainty on any subject that tends to be controversial, especially when little first-hand and empirical research is done to advance, dispel or prove a concern.
Tell me why and how fluid sexuality is 'pure and utter bs'. I wasn't actually justifying it. It's based on many accounts and stories and experiences of people I have heard from or met. It's surprised me, as a matter of fact.
I also love how people say that homosexuality as a legal, cultural and moral entity makes for a 'slippery slope' when it comes to acts of bestiality and necrophilia, etc. I can't note any instances where homosexuality was known to produce non-consensual intercourse or, er, relations with different physiological systems. And then, of course, heterosexuality is not inclusive of pedophilia, adultery, deliberate lack of procreation and non-biological impulses.
And that's not what I meant anyhow.
'Just because two men can screw each other it doesn't mean it's right' - may I ask according to what and whom? They're both humans. They even mirror each other. A man and a woman just complement each other. Both are ultimately two halves of a whole, seeking to reinforce, parallel and develop in each other.
Anyhoo. You may not bear any ill will against me, but your belief - not THE belief, which is the difference - on the theory and practice of homosexuality leaves little room for judgement against the relationship I'm currently in, and I choose to take offense to that. Not you, which is, again, the difference. All the connotations that heterosexual romance attach to are there. The partner just happens to be a guy. Your point?
Does homosexuality harm you or something? Affects how your thought processes are?
Such strong adjectives that seem to contradict everything I've seen and witnessed in my life. I don't see how they help the cause, the cause being that those adjectives you throw about are the very same that frighten many a man harbouring a same-sex attraction, to remain in the closet. Some choose to, and placidly, yes, but it's a corollary of insecurity imposed upon them. I wonder which is far more of an evil: homosexuality as according to you, or suicide or mental, physical. spiritual and emotional defects that influence a curious man's life.
A culture - whether straight or gay - where man is conditioned to hide aspects of his personal environment sure has worked wonders.
You make it sound like that all it takes is to bat for the 'right' side. If that were true, suicide or damage of any kind wouldn't have even been an option to start with. I wonder why an average gay man would choose to be persecuted by the uninformed, or cop the brunt of implicitly negative adjectives such as what you have used.
