'Da Vinci Code' Sparks Indian Riots

[B]THE LAST WORD; The Da Vinci Con
Print Single-Page Save [/B]

By LAURA MILLER
Published: February 22, 2004
The ever-rising tide of sales of ''The Da Vinci Code'' has lifted some pretty odd boats, and none odder than the dodgy yet magisterial ''Holy Blood, Holy Grail,'' by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln. A best seller in the 1980's, ''Grail'' is climbing the paperback charts again on the strength of its relationship to Dan Brown's thriller (which has, in turn, inspired a crop of new nonfiction books coming out this spring, from ''Breaking the Da Vinci Code'' to ''Secrets of the Code: The Unauthorized Guide to the Mysteries Behind The Da Vinci Code''). ''The Da Vinci Code'' is one long chase scene in which the main characters flee a sinister Parisian policeman and an albino monk assassin, but its rudimentary suspense alone couldn't have made it a hit. At regular intervals, the book brings its pell-mell plot to a screeching halt and emits a pellet of information concerning a centuries-old conspiracy that purports to have preserved a tremendous secret about the roots of Christianity itself. This ''nonfiction'' material gives ''The Da Vinci Code'' its frisson of authenticity, and it's lifted from ''Holy Blood, Holy Grail,'' one of the all-time great works of pop pseudohistory. But what seems increasingly clear (to cop a favorite phrase from the authors of ''Grail'') is that ''The Da Vinci Code,'' like ''Holy Blood, Holy Grail,'' is based on a notorious hoax.

The back story to both books, like most conspiracy theories, is devilishly hard to summarize. Both narratives begin with a mystery that leads sleuths to vaster and more sinister intrigues. In Brown's novel, it's the murder of a curator at the Louvre; in ''Grail,'' it's the unusual affluence of a priest in a village in the south of France. In the late 1960's, Henry Lincoln, a British TV writer, became interested in Rennes-le-Château, a town that had become the French equivalent of Roswell or Loch Ness as a result of popular books by Gérard de Sède. De Sède promulgated a story about parchments supposedly found in a hollowed-out pillar by the town priest in the 1890's, parchments containing coded messages that the priest somehow parlayed into oodles of cash. Lincoln worked on several ''Unsolved Mysteries''-style documentaries about Rennes-le-Château, then enlisted Baigent and Leigh for a more in-depth investigation.

What eventually emerges from the welter of names, dates, maps and genealogical tables crammed into ''Holy Blood, Holy Grail'' is a yarn about a secret and hugely influential society called the Priory of Sion, founded in Jerusalem in 1099. This cabal is said to have guarded documents and other proof that Mary Magdalene was the wife of Jesus (who may or may not have died on the Cross) and that she carried his child with her when she fled to what is now France after the Crucifixion, becoming, figuratively, the Holy Grail in whom Jesus' blood was preserved. Their progeny intermarried with the locals, eventually founding the Merovingian dynasty of Frankish monarchs. Although deposed in the eighth century, the Merovingian lineage has not been lost; the Priory has kept watch over its descendants, awaiting an auspicious moment when it will reveal the astonishing truth and return the rightful monarch to the throne of France, or perhaps even a restored Holy Roman Empire.

All the usual suspects and accouterments of paranoid history get caught up in this 1,000-year jaunt: the Cathar heretics, the Knights Templar, the Rosicrucians, the Vatican, the Freemasons, Nazis, the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the Order of the Golden Dawn -- everyone but the Abominable Snowman seems to be in on the game. ''Holy Blood, Holy Grail'' is a masterpiece of insinuation and supposition, employing all the techniques of pseudohistory to symphonic effect, justifying this sleight of hand as an innovative scholarly technique called ''synthesis,'' previously considered too ''speculative'' by those whose thinking has been unduly shaped by the ''so-called Enlightenment of the 18th century.'' Comparing themselves to the reporters who uncovered the Watergate scandal, the authors maintain that ''only by such synthesis can one discern the underlying continuity, the unified and coherent fabric, which lies at the core of any historical problem.'' To do so, one must realize that ''it is not sufficient to confine oneself exclusively to facts.''
 
celldog said:
Your opinion of me, matters not. LOL
I never said that it had to mean anything to you.
celldog said:
Now why don't you go study.... :up:
I am currently studying, I thank you for your concern.
 
Uggh. I'm not going to get into this whole argument about whether or not the whole Jesus marrying and the Priory of Sion thing is true because I don't know enougth of the HB,HG side of the argument. I will say that Holy Blood, Holy Grail's version of history and the Bible's version can both be disputed. I personally doubt that either is entirely or even mostly true.
 
celldog said:
Brown has stated that it is only "fiction" in that the characters are fictional. He claims that the elements in the story are truth.

A. that Jesus was married to Mary Magdelene
B. that he was never crucified
C. the the church covered this up
D. that Constantine made the Nicean counsel declare Jesus as God
E. That the Priory of Sion was a secret organization that Da Vinci belonged
to, that held the secret documents about Jesus & Mary Magdelene.
F. That The Opus Dei have murderous monks that will kill to keep the secret.

And much more.........

All a pack of lies. But Brown says they are true. That's why Christians are upset!

So you can stop falling back on the "It's only fiction" card. This issue is deeper than that.

Brown later went on to say that he stole most of these concepts from another fiction book called holy blood, holy grail or something.
 
8Ball2/JanG5 said:
Brown later went on to say that he stole most of these concepts from another fiction book called holy blood, holy grail or something.

Oh really??? He just won a court case against the authors of that book who said he stole from them.
 
ampersand said:
Uggh. I'm not going to get into this whole argument about whether or not the whole Jesus marrying and the Priory of Sion thing is true because I don't know enougth of the HB,HG side of the argument. I will say that Holy Blood, Holy Grail's version of history and the Bible's version can both be disputed. I personally doubt that either is entirely or even mostly true.


And how do you come to that conclusion??? What is your source material? Especially concerning the Bible's version of history.
 
celldog said:
Oh really??? He just won a court case against the authors of that book who said he stole from them.


And in the case he admitted he "borrowed" some plot details from said book. Look it up.
 
Where's the passion over 'Da Vinci Code'?
Updated 5/14/2006 11:49 PM ET E-mail | Save | Print | Subscribe to stories like this


5 BIGGEST FLAWS IN 'DA VINCI'

Fiction : The Priory of Sion is an ancient group charged with protecting the secret of the real Holy Grail, and Leonardo da Vinci was a Grand Master of the Priory of Sion.

Fact : The Priory of Sion was established in 1956 by a crackpot Frenchman who was exposed as a fraud in the French media in the 1980s. The documents claiming Leonardo's role were forged and planted in French archives in the 1960s. Since there was no Priory of Sion in the way that The Da Vinci Code describes it, Leonardo couldn't have been a part of it. Simple logic.

Fiction : Politics determined what Gospels made it into the Bible.

Fact : By the mid-second century, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were widely accepted as the foundational texts of Christianity. The criteria had nothing to do with gender or power. It was all about whether they reflected the witness of the apostles about Jesus, how old they were, and how useful they were for the entire church, instead of just a small group.

Fiction : Constantine invented the divinity of Christ in 325.

Fact : Even a cursory look at textual evidence shows that Christians worshipped Jesus as Lord long before Constantine's reign. The Council of Nicaea was called to address a heresy called Arianism, which taught that Jesus wasn't fully divine.

Fiction : Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married.

Fact : The Gospels are all very forthright about Jesus' familial relations, and they don't hide the existence of Mary Magdalene, either. If they had been married, there would have been no reason to hide the fact.

Fiction : Christianity demonized Mary Magdalene in order to suppress her influence.

Fact : Mary Magdalene is a saint. In every Gospel, she is cited as the first person to find the empty tomb. She was the second-most revered saint of the Middle Ages, after Mary, Jesus' mother. That's an odd way to demonize.

Contributing: By Amy Welborn





[
 
celldog said:
And how do you come to that conclusion??? What is your source material? Especially concerning the Bible's version of history.

The Bible was written in a time when history was told through word of mouth. Then it was translated and changed by all kinds of people throughout history. It's basically like a giant game of telephone, you never end up with the same story in the end.
 
ampersand said:
The Bible was written in a time when history was told through word of mouth. Then it was translated and changed by all kinds of people throughout history. It's basically like a giant game of telephone, you never end up with the same story in the end.


Oh really? where'd you get that?
 
Darthphere said:
And in the case he admitted he "borrowed" some plot details from said book. Look it up.

but he won the case.
 
Darthphere said:
And in the case he admitted he "borrowed" some plot details from said book. Look it up.


And I agree that it's pretty clear that he snatched some stuff from there. But he still won he case.
 
celldog said:
but he won the case.


Ok? But he pretty much admitted to stealing ideas from the book in question, its on the record. Whether he won the case or not is irrelevant.
 
Disgusting facsists.
If a movie's made that contradicts your beliefs sufficiently to anger you, you DON'T SEE IT. You don't demand that it not be released.
:rolleyes:
Some of us :eek: don't have the same beliefs as you! :eek:
 
Wilhelm-Scream said:
Disgusting facsists.
If a movie's made that contradicts your beliefs sufficiently to anger you, you DON'T SEE IT. You don't demand that it not be released.
:rolleyes:
Some of us :eek: don't have the same beliefs as you! :eek:


This is true lunacy!
 
Darthphere said:
Ok? But he pretty much admitted to stealing ideas from the book in question, its on the record. Whether he won the case or not is irrelevant.

Just some trivia for ya.
 
THAT'S IT! I'M burning down Dan Brown's embassy! AND the VATICAN's embassy! Who's with me?
 
That muslims thing was dumb (I used to be a muslim) but this is just as dumb if everyone already knows if its a fiction story, hell dan rown was sued because he ripped off another book (he really did his research) :rolleyes:
 
times like these, you gotta love that old saying "I have no problem with god, it's his fan club I can't stand"
 
JackBauer said:
times like these, you gotta love that old saying "I have no problem with god, it's his fan club I can't stand"

Could God beat Batman if He had enough prep-time? ;)
 
echostation said:
at least they aint blowing themselves up over it and destroying and burning embassies over a damn cartoon
I know you're indian but please, keep your biased views to yourself. Indians are peaceful but they aren't as holy as you think. I kow the muslim thing was dumb and they do really live in thr 1300s but I remember 10 years ago indians burnt down movie theaters because they showed 2 girls kissing. Hinduism is a more peaceful than Islam though (a religion of peace eh)
 
1414302797.01._AA240_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,744
Messages
22,019,322
Members
45,813
Latest member
xXxCryBabyxXx
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"