Daniel Craig owns you.

Carmine Falcone

So it goes.
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
19,576
Reaction score
0
Points
31
New James Bond actor Daniel Craig has had enough. Stirred and a little shaken by a tidal wave of criticism over his choice as 007, Craig is fed up of biting his lip while everybody has a pop.

Too blond, too short and too delicate were some of the kinder comments. He was even accused of being seasick when he stepped off a speedboat in in London during the announcement that he would be taking over the role from Pierce Brosnan.

Now, as the world waits to see if he measures up in the soon-to-be released Casino Royale, Craig has decided to have his say.

And you can forget about any suave Bond one-liners. Craig is angry, f**ing angry.

According to one report Craig, 38, couldn't drive a car with a manual gearbox, prompting jokes of Bond kangarooing away from the bad guys in his Aston Martin.

"Of course I can drive a manual car," he says. "I flogged the arse out of an Aston Martin DBS around Jeremy Clarkson's Top Gear track.

"And in the film I got the car up to 170mph. When I braked, we had those brakes just f**king glowing. Will that do?

"Sorry, but most posh cars are automatic. I think someone leaked that I drove one which gets changed to, 'Ha, ha! You can't change gear'!"

He's also peeved about those seasick-on-the-Thames jokes.

"You know, normally I wouldn't answer these questions, but f**k it, no I didn't get queasy on that boat."

He adds: "Some of the stuff that's been said is as close to playground taunts as you're going to get. 'You've got big ears'... f**king hell! But it's not right. Ask anyone who's been bullied... it hurts. There's a part of me that would love to turn around and shove it up their arse."

Understandably Craig's a little nervous as he awaits the reaction to Casino Royale and says it's a bit like Russian roulette.

"If it's a huge success, I'm f..**ked," he says. "And if it's not a huge success, I'm probably f**ked as well.

"I asked Steven Spielberg, 'Would you employ me again if I was Bond', and he said, 'Course I f**king would'. But he's a huge Bond fan. Taking the part has divided my friends a bit, some of them said, 'You're going to f**k yourself here'. And they might be right."

Casino Royale, which opens on November 17, is the first of a three-film deal which will earn Craig £15million. But his critics are yet to be convinced he has the physical presence to be Bond. They say he could not be more different than author Ian Fleming's original description of an "Eton-educated son of a Scots father and a Swiss mother, with a full head of black hair that fell across his brow like a dark comma".

Among the more bizarre criticisms he has had to face are accusations that he is too short to play Bond and he pointedly refuses to reveal his height. "I'm five to six feet... I'd like to think tall enough," he says. "But I'll never be tall enough in some people's eyes."

But he shouldn't worry. According to most biographies he is 5ft 11in, just an inch shorter than Fleming described his secret agent.

Stripped of the gadgets and the characters of Q and Moneypenny, Casino Royale promises to be a darker, raw Bond movie. There's a vicious torture sequence that was included in the novel which Craig still remembers with a shudder.

"The bad guy takes the bottom out of a chair," says Craig in his interview with GQ magazine. "I'm sat in it naked and supposedly my nuts are hanging down there, although I think in that situation they would kind of go north.

"The bad guy gets a spliced piece of rope and he swings it under the chair and does me with it.

"It all has fibreglass protection but it did crack at one point and we stopped filming quite rapidly and I ran over the other side of the room. Woah!"

Craig also damaged his teeth during shooting in Prague, as the Sunday Mirror revealed.

"I got a cap knocked out, but that was the least of my problems," he says. "You have no idea of the f**king injuries I was picking up during that movie. "But then the whole of Casino Royale was a painful experience. I was in pain throughout the whole movie.

"But you can't show pain. They say you're not doing it right if you're not getting hurt.

"The stunt boys were going through pain levels that I couldn't even imagine and still carrying on. Compressed spines, all sorts of things."

Craig believes that Casino Royale could be the most violent Bond film ever.

"That's the thing with Bond, he bleeds, goes down and gets up again," he says. "There's a bathroom sequence that still makes me wince when I watch it. All my knuckles were split and my hands were in bandages after it.

"I had a fight double named Ben. I did the bits that hurt and he did the bits that really f**king hurt."

Craig says he had doubts about playing the role when he was first approached by producers and demanded to see a script before he made a decision.

"I read it and I loved it," he says. "It engaged me, it made me laugh, it did all the things you want. So then I thought I've got to throw myself into this."

And part of that was keeping himself fit for the action sequences. "I started training when I knew I might get the part," he says. "I work out three or four times a week. But I take weekends off and drink as much Guinness as I can get down my neck!"

Providing the love interest in Casino Royale is sexy double agent Vesper Lynd, played by French actress Eva Green - who was described by one critic as looking "so perfect that it hurts".

And off-screen Craig lives up to Bond's ladykiller reputation, having been romantically linked with Sienna Miller, Kate Moss and film production executive Satsuki Mitchell.

But Craig's love life is definite off limits in this interview. "I'd never talk about a previous relationship even if I wasn't with somebody famous and so I think the same rule has to be applied. The only reason why I'd ever talk about that would be for my own advantage and that's really bad news. That's as low as you can go as far as I'm concerned."

Craig is determined to keep his feet on the ground, although he has admitted a change in the way he is viewed since landing the role.

"Some people think that you're suddenly this multi-millionaire while some fans do think that I'm actually James Bond and they even write to me with plans of action," he says.

The full version of this article is in the December issue of GQ, on sale now.
 
I want to see Michael Caine actually using a cane.....on George Bush and Bin Laden. A two hour movie of that.
 
Meh all he did was say f**k alot
 
Daniel Craig is one of the funniest actors I've ever seen. He's got this slightly 'naive' quality as if he doesn't expect Bond fans to go

"Er, Daniel, why the heck are you playing James Bond?"

LOL! :woot:

He's also very honest and says he's been criticised and it's hurt him. He's a funny guy - sort of the Mr Bean of the Bond world. LOL! He's more Bean than Bond. Hee hee.
 
I see you have taken up the belittle act. You act like you think he is funny and pathetic while you're actually angry. You have no reason to be angry though, Daniel Craig is going to rock as James Bond.

Kevin Roegele said:
I want to see Michael Caine actually using a cane.....on George Bush and Bin Laden. A two hour movie of that.

If there was any justice in the world that flick would be in development right NOW.
 
I find it really strange how so many people seem to be obsessed with the way he looks.

Kind of reminds me of the whole thing with Michael Keaton playing Batman.
 
Hades said:
I find it really strange how so many people seem to be obsessed with the way he looks.

Uh, of course. Its an integral part of the character. I am sure they look for good looks first, talent second. I think it was the other way around this time though.....
 
Yeah, I'd agree with that.

But, it seems to me that THIS Bond is alot deeper....more stuff going on, so that could be the real reason why.
 
I never criticized Daniel Craig once as Bond.
I always had confidence that he could be possibly the best Bond.
Craig is right to be hurt and shouldn't have been criticized by the fans for a movie that hasn't even been released yet. Even if Casino Royale blows the fans away, some will still b**** about how bad Daniel Craig was, just because he has blond hair.
 
super_fan said:
Daniel Craig is one of the funniest actors I've ever seen. He's got this slightly 'naive' quality as if he doesn't expect Bond fans to go

"Er, Daniel, why the heck are you playing James Bond?"

LOL! :woot:

He's also very honest and says he's been criticised and it's hurt him. He's a funny guy - sort of the Mr Bean of the Bond world. LOL! He's more Bean than Bond. Hee hee.
You are a pathetic individual.
 
Hades said:
I find it really strange how so many people seem to be obsessed with the way he looks.

Kind of reminds me of the whole thing with Michael Keaton playing Batman.

Not strange at all. As we haven't seen the movie yet, all we can judge him on is how he looks. In today's culture, we can't say, "Wait and see," we have to know right now. He's either great or he sucks, straight away.
 
Craig is going to be a great Bond in IMHO. I'm really looking forward to him in CR. Hopefully it'll live to my expectations. :up:
 
I never, and i repeat, NEVAH doubted Daniel Craig. I was a fan of his work on the movie L4YER CAKE and knew that an actor like would only do roles if he felt it was there.

Daniel Craig will be to the 007 franchise what Christian Bale is to the Batman franchise.

Anyone who doubted Craig, anybody who thought he didnt fit the description has obviously never payed close attention to the source material and can go F**K themselves.

I feel for Daniel Craig and have absolutally no tolerance for anyone who is so ignorant as to judge somebody with nothing but visual references from a previous incarnation that is in my opinion void ant moot when compared to the description offered by the Ian Flemming books.
 
thedarks0ldier said:
I never, and i repeat, NEVAH doubted Daniel Craig. I was a fan of his work on the movie L4YER CAKE and knew that an actor like would only do roles if he felt it was there.

Daniel Craig will be to the 007 franchise what Christian Bale is to the Batman franchise.

Anyone who doubted Craig, anybody who thought he didnt fit the description has obviously never payed close attention to the source material and can go F**K themselves.

I feel for Daniel Craig and have absolutally no tolerance for anyone who is so ignorant as to judge somebody with nothing but visual references from a previous incarnation that is in my opinion void ant moot when compared to the description offered by the Ian Flemming books.

Well said. :up:
 
Daniel Craig's Bond is going down this week!

reg_donuts6.jpg


Four days and counting! Licence revoked, Daniel. :cwink:
 
super_fan said:
Daniel Craig's Bond is going down this week!

reg_donuts6.jpg


Four days and counting! Licence revoked, Daniel. :cwink:

Hah! Quite funny and (hopefully) accurate. Looks matter. Bill Murray is a fine actor but could never pull off Batman, Superman, etc. Craig is a fine actor but simply looks all wrong for the part. It's ludicrous really.
 
super_fan said:
Daniel Craig's Bond is going down this week!

reg_donuts6.jpg


Four days and counting! Licence revoked, Daniel. :cwink:

:whatever:
 
I don't agree about the looks. I championed for this man to play Bond:

michael-moore-fugly.jpg


Michael Moore was born for the role. And his pizza could have played a great Bond girl.

:cwink:
 
Thot said:
Hah! Quite funny and (hopefully) accurate. Looks matter. Bill Murray is a fine actor but could never pull off Batman, Superman, etc. Craig is a fine actor but simply looks all wrong for the part. It's ludicrous really.
Personally, I find your logic to be the only thing ludicrous.

I'm not a big fan of Craig. Not at all, actually. He doesn't look very much like Bond...but he's certainly not Bill Murray, either. After seeing some highly unconventional castings in my lifetime do fantastically, I really can't say Craig is a bad Bond based purely on superficials.

I'm also not diluted enough to believe the looks of any actor, in any role, is more important than acting, directing, story, etc., etc. in determining the success (both critical and financial) of film.

Michael Keaton got this exact same treatment when he was cast as Batman. I'm sure people said exactly the same thing you're saying. Batman '89 became a giant blockbuster, and the highest-grossing superhero film for over 15 years.

I'm not saying CR will do those numbers or anything like that, but, simply put, you simply cannot judge that kind of thing until you've actually seen the film. And you, and me have not seen it.
 
Thot and superfan are trying so hard to be the latter day bakerboy and mr parker.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"