slevinkelevra
Civilian
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2007
- Messages
- 469
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
is anyone reading this? i think it is awesome and a good spin from eisner's spirit stories.
LOL! He's leaving with #12.
This is my favorite DC book as of right now. I love Cooke. I think its some major monkey fck me up the anus **** about him leaving . *weeps bitterly*
Yeah, I was pretty depressed earlier.
hold me
The thing I find pretty funny is, as good as Cooke's Spirit is, it's nowhere near as good as Eisner's. Eisner was THAT goddamn good.
Yep....Eisner was great.......
Well, from what I've read, Eisner had more well-rounded black characters after he went back to the title after WWII.
The way that black characters were drawn and written back then was practically a tradition. Hell, even Stan Lee, one of the coolest motherf**kers in the comic industry, had to write that character at the beginning of his career when he wrote "Young Allies."
Funny thing is, though, that Cooke has updated and un-stereotyped Ebony in his new books. That takes a hell of a lot of balls, right there, opening that can of worms. Hell, not even Miller, who's practically the ballsiest guy in history, said he wasn't even going to touch Ebony for the movie.
Same here. I enjoy the book a lot. Cooke leaves, I guess I am too.its a really great book. im surprised by darwyns writing skills on both spirit and superman confidential.
Where is it funny ? I disagree ; I never thought Eisner was that big big genius. And I think Cooke did very, very well with the Spirit.CConn said:The thing I find pretty funny is, as good as Cooke's Spirit is, it's nowhere near as good as Eisner's. Eisner was THAT goddamn good.
Even if Eisner was - and I'm not saying he was - a poserboy for the KKK, that still doesn't diminish the quality of his stories. Ebony wasn't in all of the Spirit stories. And the ones he wasn't in, where perfectly acceptable, amazingly well-written stories of justice and revenge and simple morals and goodness that everyone could enjoy.
Yep....Eisner was great.......
Yet not nearly as good as Eisner.Where is it funny ? I disagree ; I never thought Eisner was that big big genius. And I think Cooke did very, very well with the Spirit.