• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

David Fincher to Direct The Social Network

Rate The Movie

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, he's my favorite actor that's only in it for the money.
 
Idk about that Spidey, a DVD rip leaked.
Thats not going to stop the movie from making money. I wish I would have responded to this before it's numbers came in but anyway, Thrusdays numbers showed that the movie was going to have another good drop. It's already successful and it's headed for I'd say, 90 to 95mil if it keeps up the early 30percent drops that it's been having. It has great legs and it has made more than it's 40 to 50million dollar budget and thats all I wanted.

I'm not good at reading international numbers so I have no idea what it's headed for outside the states.
 
Did anyone else feel more sympathy for Mark than Eduardo on further review? If Eduardo had gotten his way, Facebook would have ****ing sucked. The sleazy advertisements would have totally killed the site. Not to mention freezing the bank account was a total dick move. It really could have been the end of everything if the hedge fund didn't give them the 500k investment when they did. Parker may have been a conniving prick, but he gave what Facebook needed to take off. Eduardo was too immature to realize what it took to be a successful business person. The way he got screwed was ****ed and he totally deserved to get his piece of the pie, but what Mark did what was necessary. Was it really worth it in the end for Mark? If he really wanted to be where he is now, it was probably was.
 
you forgot one important point. they were BEST friends and you expect a better behaviour from a best friend. eduardo realized that he needs to be more open for other ideas. even during difficult times, he stood by mark and supported him. he wanted his attention, that's why he did freeze the bank account. he wanted to feel needed but in the end they used him and got rid of him in a very bad way. he never expected something like that from a close friend. his only best friend. that's why i feel more sympathy for eduardo.
 
he's a huge bond fan and i'm pretty sure he will direct a bond film in the future..

I know that, but I have a feeling he will wait to do one. I think he'll make films with Bond elements (like Inception) but to make a Bond film, I'm not so sure about. If he does, like I said, it won't be for a while yet.
 
While I don't know how he could handle the dry humor, Bale could play the more cold blooded killer angle like Craig and Dalton.
 
JAK®;19145189 said:
Ugh, no way. He doesn't have the charisma.

I agree, however, I don't think Craig does, either.
 
Craig definitely has charisma. Bond doesn't need constant one liners to be cool. He should exude a coolness factor, which Craig does. Moore turned him into a joke pretty much, Connery had the right balance. I guess it depends on the strengths of the actor too.

But this isn't the place to argue. This is about The Social Network.
 
Finally got a chance to see it, I thought Justin Timberlake was a pretty good actor before but my God, he was fantastic in this. Weasely, friendly, likable, and a complete d*** (am I allowed to use that word when not referring to Robin, Nightwing, or Batman?) at the same time. I'm now very certain that Andrew Garfield will make a great Peter Parker when Webb's reboot rolls around. My only previous exposure to Armie Hammer was his role as the Devil's son in Reaper, but he was fantastic as the twins. Eisenberg was so awkward, which is a good thing, and the character seemed the most real out of all of them.

Has the score been released?
 
Yeah, he's my favorite actor that's only in it for the money.

inbrugesgif-1.gif


u trollin?
 
Craig definitely has charisma. Bond doesn't need constant one liners to be cool. He should exude a coolness factor, which Craig does. Moore turned him into a joke pretty much, Connery had the right balance. I guess it depends on the strengths of the actor too.

But this isn't the place to argue. This is about The Social Network.
You've jumped from 'charisma' to 'one-liners'. Who was talking about one-liners?
 
He also acted in Chris Nolan films.

Proving he's only in it for the money.
 
JAK®;19145934 said:
You've jumped from 'charisma' to 'one-liners'. Who was talking about one-liners?

Oh, true to u. :o
 
Finally got a chance to see it, I thought Justin Timberlake was a pretty good actor before but my God, he was fantastic in this. Weasely, friendly, likable, and a complete d*** (am I allowed to use that word when not referring to Robin, Nightwing, or Batman?) at the same time. I'm now very certain that Andrew Garfield will make a great Peter Parker when Webb's reboot rolls around. My only previous exposure to Armie Hammer was his role as the Devil's son in Reaper, but he was fantastic as the twins. Eisenberg was so awkward, which is a good thing, and the character seemed the most real out of all of them.

Has the score been released?
Regarding JT (and the movie), my sentiments exactly.:yay:

I think that the Batman/Nolan related stuff in every single thread is getting out of hand.
 
Yeah... Bale must have really needed the money if he lost 70 lbs for The Machinest....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"