This thread just makes me tired...I've never seen so much bloviating in one place...I'm surprised theres anymore oxygen left in the world....lmao
Bye!
This thread just makes me tired...I've never seen so much bloviating in one place...I'm surprised theres anymore oxygen left in the world....lmao
But Galactus isn't really neccessary as far as being a huge visible presence in this film. A glipse would be fine but just knowing he's there and what he's all about is enough for this film. If they further explore this storyline THEN it would be time to get into that but I want Doom wrapped up in this film if possible...at leats for now.
I can only hope that Fox and Tim deliver.
Unless the Surfer convinces Galactus to leave at the end...for now. He could always pop up in FF4 or beyond when maybe they have a better understanding of how to create what people want on screen without it looking like purple cheese. Who knows.
I was with you.. Til this part.Have to agree with AD on this one. Wrap up Doom for now. Show Galactus near the end as a setup for the next movie. If they do not carry this out to the logical conclusion i.e bring on Galctus in 3, then that would be a crime.Galactus in 3 is the logical next step, along with Franklin.
t: Bring on Galactus, bring on Franklin.
t:
I was with you.. Til this part.
If you want to stick to the source material then its illogical to bring Franklin in right after they take down galactus... plus by adding Franklin it will just make the movie more campier.And what is the matter with Franklin ?![]()
If you want to stick to the source material then its illogical to bring Franklin in right after they take down galactus... plus by adding Franklin it will just make the movie more campier.
I just don't want him..
he is to campy..
This thread is about sticking to the source material.
So, let's discuss Sue's hair.t:
In Malus's FANTASTIC cover countdown thread, FF Cover 100 was recently posted:
![]()
Notice that Sue's hair looks just like Sue's hair in FF2.
This cover was drawn by Kirby, the guy who most diehards want the movie to emulate.
It's simple: If you hate FF2 Sue's hair, you hate Kirby. Dissing Kirby cannot be tolerated. Therefore, dissing Sue's new hair cannot be tolerated.
I love math.![]()
What? That has got to be one of the most "out of context" statements I've seen in a while on here....."If you hate FF2 Sue's hair, you hate Kirby.???" Please tell me that is full on sarcasm.....![]()
![]()
![]()
This thread is about sticking to the source material.
So, let's discuss Sue's hair.t:
In Malus's FANTASTIC cover countdown thread, FF Cover 100 was recently posted:
![]()
Notice that Sue's hair looks just like Sue's hair in FF2.
This cover was drawn by Kirby, the guy who most diehards want the movie to emulate.
It's simple: If you hate FF2 Sue's hair, you hate Kirby. Dissing Kirby cannot be tolerated. Therefore, dissing Sue's new hair cannot be tolerated.
I love math.![]()
Although I really love Kirby's work, we all know it was highly stylized. In order to emulate it, a director would have to make what Rodriguez did to Sin City, which is not the case, I suppose, by now.
And more: I would prefer that the movies would emulate John Byrne, and not only his art, but his rich and intelligent text, also.![]()
Although I really love Kirby's work, we all know it was highly stylized. In order to emulate it, a director would have to make what Rodriguez did to Sin City, which is not the case, I suppose, by now.
And more: I would prefer that the movies would emulate John Byrne, and not only his art, but his rich and intelligent text, also.![]()
Moi? Sarcastic? You have to be kidding.![]()
However, there are some pictures where Sue's hair in the new movie looks just like the hair Kirby drew, IMHO.
There are also pictures where the wig looks very.... flat, as you mentioned.