Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]340391[/split]
The CAS, designed as an "educational" service to combat casual piracy in the U.S., has been criticized as designed purely for corporate interests, at the expense of the average Internet user. While it doesn't require ISPs to cut off Internet access to repeat piratesas is the case in France and New Zealandit will issue escalating punishments to suspected pirates, severely reducing their connection speeds after five or six offenses.
If corporate power is controlled by consumers then it should be easy to stop these media giants, right Libertarians?
Corporate power is controlled by the consumers.
But when the consumers are fine with bending over and taking it, guess what happens?
I was hoping the whole SOPA/PIPA debacle might be the wake up call we needed, at least the first. Let the people know that their voices can make a difference, and remind Congress who the real bosses are.
Too bad it didn't stick![]()
Does this mean YouTube is in for a rude awakening next week?
"Carl Bergmanson, a New Jersey gubernatorial democrat running in the 2013 primary, has recently spoken out against the new 'six strike policy' being put in place this week by major ISPs. He said: 'The internet has become an essential part of living in the 21st century, it uses public infrastructure and it is time we treat it as a public utility. The electric company has no say over what you power with their service, the ISPs have no right to decide what you can and can not download.'"
Well, if you live in New Jersey, you might want to start backing this guy.
And, if you don't live in New Jersey, you might want to write a check for his campaign anyway.
http://www.politickernj.com/63481/candidate-bergmanson-decries-new-six-strike-rule
By a 5-8 vote, the House Rules committee rejected a bipartisan fix to the CISPA data-sharing bill that would have ensured companies' privacy promises -- including their terms of use and privacy policies -- remained valid and legally enforceable in the future.
It also came hours after a formal veto threat from the Obama administration, citing privacy and other concerns about CISPA. A House floor debate is scheduled to begin tomorrow, which now will not include a vote on the amendment.
Rep. Justin Amash, a Michigan Republican who also sponsored the amendment, said afterward on Twitter that the committee "actually wants to prohibit companies from guaranteeing your privacy."