🌎 Discussion: Online Piracy, AI, Net Neutrality, Killswitch, and Other Internet Issues II

World News
Yeah and we need to do it whether the legislation is perfect or not or offends the NRA-esque tech rights extremist groups.
Let's throw in regulations for social media as well. I get people worry it will hurt free speech and freedom of expression, but when flimsy ToSs do next to **** to prevent hate speech on platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter, it's time for Congress to reel them in.
 
It does make me sick that our major search options are both owned by Google and Microsoft. DuckDuck Go and Ecosia can't fully compete since they also use Bing to perform their searches.
 
Why do people have to be so cruel? :(
 
Google and Meta struck secret ads deal to target teenagers


Google and Meta made a secret deal to target advertisements for Instagram to teenagers on YouTube, skirting the search company's own rules for how minors are treated online. According to documents seen by the Financial Times and people familiar with the matter, Google worked on a marketing project for Meta that was designed to target 13- to 17-year-old YouTube users with adverts that promoted its rival's photo and video app. The Instagram campaign deliberately targeted a group of users labelled as "unknown" in its advertising system, which Google knew skewed towards under-18s, these people said. Meanwhile, documents seen by the FT suggest steps were taken to ensure the true intent of the campaign was disguised. The project disregarded Google's rules that prohibit personalising and targeting ads to under-18s, including serving ads based on demographics. It also has policies against the circumvention of its own guidelines, or "proxy targeting".
When contacted by the FT, Google initiated an investigation into the allegations. The project has now been cancelled, a person familiar with the decision said. Google said: "We prohibit ads being personalised to people under-18, period. These policies go well beyond what is required and are supported by technical safeguards. We've confirmed that these safeguards worked properly here" because no registered YouTube users known to be under 18 were directly targeted by the company.

However, Google did not deny using the "unknown" loophole, adding: "We'll also be taking additional action to reinforce with sales representatives that they must not help advertisers or agencies run campaigns attempting to work around our policies." Meta said it disagreed that selecting the "unknown" audience constituted personalisation or a circumvention of any rules, adding that it adhered to its own policies as well as those of its peers when advertising its services. It did not respond to questions about whether staff were aware that the "unknown" group skewed to younger users.
Google won the mandate from Spark and the teams on both sides took precautions, banning any direct reference to the age range in writing, one of the people said. Staff used euphemisms in presentations, such as slides with only the words "embrace the unknown", according to documents reviewed by the FT.
 




Apple wants a 30% cut not just for apps now on their store (annoying but fair), but from everything you buy on a device Apple manufactured, potentially like a purchase on Amazon.

Governments need to come down hard on this.

Apple’s greed is also inflationary.
 
Last edited:

Bloomberg News - US Considers a Rare Antitrust Move: Breaking Up Google

  • Antitrust enforcers soliciting input from outside companies
  • Judge ruled Alphabet unit monopolized online search, ads

Let's add Apple and Amazon to the list too. It's not illegal to have a monopoly; it's illegal to have and use your monopoly to attain another monopoly in something else as well as dictate/strongarm other corporations outside your own.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
200,923
Messages
21,854,740
Members
45,662
Latest member
TheBatman22
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"