Majik1387
Avenger
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2004
- Messages
- 41,629
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 33
From a animation standpoint (not an entertaining) all of Dreamworks 2D films were way better than any of the Disney film of the last 30 years.
No...
From a animation standpoint (not an entertaining) all of Dreamworks 2D films were way better than any of the Disney film of the last 30 years.
GK: Hes really John Lasseter. He is not Walt Disney and its good that way, because theres only one Walt Disney and one John Lasseter, but Ive known John Lasseter since he was eighteen, a long time. John has created a studio that represents his spirit. And Walt Disney has created There are differences between Pixar and Disney. If you reduced Pixar to a phrase it would be: « Wouldnt it be cool if? »
Like if a kid was looking at their toy: What if the toy could talk? All their films are like this.
If you reduced the Disney films it would be: « Once upon a time »
There is big difference. « Once upon a time » its make believe. Its the atmosphere we breathe in the two studios and John is president of both but for the first couple of years it was a constant fight for him to accept that Disney is not Pixar. Theyre completely different. Now hes started to respect the differences between the two. Its important to realize Disney is Disney, Pixar is Pixar. And John is John and Walt is Walt.
Finally saw this...and loved it! It was a really pleasant surprise. It also reminded me of my Mandy Moore love...she did such a fantastic job with the vocals![]()
What ****ing kept you? This should have been priority one back in Nov.![]()
It is.It's in 3d on blu, ain't it?
That budget isn't just for Tangled, but for the failed attempts at the film before Tangled itself was madeI'm probably fairly late, but what in the world is up with this film's ridiculous budget? That's easily double of most modern-day blockbusters.