Can we acknowledge for a second that Don Johnson was absolutely fantastic in his role? I hope he gets more offers to be in films because of this.
Can we acknowledge for a second that Don Johnson was absolutely fantastic in his role? I hope he gets more offers to be in films because of this.
I think the usage of the word didn't bother me in the film and that it felt more time appropriate than its usage in contemporary commercial hip hop and some other works. That being said, I don't completely buy the historical context or accuracy defense either.
For one, Tarantino did use contemporary language, even slang in some of the dialogue so it is possible that he could've not used the n-word so much. Also the film wasn't historically accurate in other aspects so it didn't have to be in the usage of the n-word.
Now, some defenders are quick to point out that it's just entertainment, it's not meant to be historically accurate when it comes to certain things, but fall back on the historical accuracy argument on the usage of the n-word. That doesn't gibe with me.
where's my nash bridges movie
This is a great articulation of the problem.
Tarantino very much wrote this like someone living in 2012 which is fine. He's an artist and exaggeration is a big part of it. So for this argument of "this is how it was" is a huge Ugh to me.
To the modern ear "You n---er." Is mean and racist and vile. Which fits the dark Sergio Leone style of Western he was invoking. But we all know that black people were referred to by many different derogatory names, but "you darky" or "you negro" doesn't have the same bite to the modern ear. It would be like someone calling a black person colored in 2012. You'd just look at them strangely.
So we end up with the n-word used like water.
Look at the characters he was depicting on screen though.These were all sleazy guys probably even by the standards of regular slave traders. Reading the script there is actually a scene that was cut out for the movie, where we see broomhilda being bought and brought to a "nice" slave owning family and there they don't refer to her by that word. I can see why that scene was cut though movie was long enough and i beleive jonah hill would have had to accept the role.
Anyways these are bad men why would bad men not use what was actually a relatively acceptable slur back then? This is like asking why do the bad men in quentin's other movies use the f-word so much?
Apparently that scene whereCandie rubs his bloody hand all over Broomhilda's face was ad-libbed as Leo did really cut his hand slamming it down and Kerry Washington had no idea he was going to do that to her.
Apparently that scene whereCandie rubs his bloody hand all over Broomhilda's face was ad-libbed as Leo did really cut his hand slamming it down and Kerry Washington had no idea he was going to do that to her.
Django used the word quite a bit too, as did Schultz (with Schultz it came across that he was at least conflicted or contrite about its usage though, but still he used it). Would you consider them bad men? At least in the context of this movie?
I think The Comic Book Kid makes a good point that there were other racial epithets, less familiar to modern audiences, that would've been just as time appropriate. However, Tarantino likes to shock, to provoke and the n-word does that better. In fact, I can recall only one other racial epithet besides the n-word used, and it was said by Django.
Since this was a fantasy film in many respects, it was a conscious choice-not necessarily guided or at least dictated by history-for him to use the n-word as much. I heard, don't know if it's true, that the original script had even more usage of the word than the film did.
It's because the way it was edited. I remember thinking the same too, his hand cut came out of nowhere.
For your examples of django and schultz using it. Django was a dejected slave who was most likely very used to hearing that word. As a slave he was supposed to be kept mentally weak and slave masters were notorious for breaking the spirits of their slaves. It would not be surprising that was the word django heard himself being called the most.
As for schultz he was playing a role talking to these guy he had to appear on their level, he bottled his true feelings remember that scene where he kept having flashbacks to the dog ripping scene?
I was skeptical over how much the word was really used back then so i did my own research and yes it was used a great great deal back then. Words like "colored" and "negro" actually became the pc words of their time at the turn of the 20th century. Read Huck Finn by mark twain and see how much that word was used. Twain actually used it more times than Tarantino!
Yeah tarantino likes to shock but when depicting slavery he didn't have to go far from actual history. The only thing he really exaggerated was the "mandingo fighting" which scholars have not been able to prove existed on much of a scale at all. He based that from the 70's movie of the same name.