Superman Returns Do you think Singer should've done....

[Binker]

Two movies back to back?

Due to the Donner influence and that he did the first two back-to-back.

 

[I SEE SPIDEY]

No. Because making sequels back to back is a dangerous thing. And yes I'm looking at POTC2, because if it's disliked by the movie going public the 3rd one is screwed. See Matrix 2 and 3 for details.

Can't wait to see Pirates BTW.

 

[Jakomus]

No. He only wanted to tell this story, and possibly a sequel if it does well.

 

[Lightning54SC]

agreed.... id like to see where Singer & Co can run with the sequal

 

[ROBOCOP CPU001]

I still think this movie is a gamble after all this time..it would have been a little ahead of themselfs.

 

[y2jversion1]

Two movies back to back?

Due to the Donner influence and that he did the first two back-to-back.

Hell no. And thank goodness he didn't.

 

[JBElliott]

Hmmm, should Singer have produced two bad Superman movies back to back? No, one was more than enough.

 

[gimmen64]

It would have been better to do 2 movies together and would have been better to keep the story line in check a bit more. The only thing that I see wrong with SR was the Superson.

 

[patrickbateman]

singer should have done the prequel intro in cell animation explaining how superman left

 

[kal-el2006]

naw..would have created to many problems

 

[patrickbateman]

naw..would have created to many problems

not many remember this guy bangin lois