Infinity9999x
Avenger
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2005
- Messages
- 12,107
- Reaction score
- 638
- Points
- 103
I also like that she's not a bumbling detective like Watson normally is, and usually draws the wrong conclusions about things.
As for Holmes's take on law and justice, well I think he's also a man of compassion here. While he wouldn't just let someone go, he realises that Abigail (was that her name?) had already served her time and wasn't a monster, so he's not going to try to pin this new murder on her as penance for the old one for which she was acquitted. His compassion is also why he didn't want her confessing to it when he knew the boy was guilty.
I suppose he could have tried to prove the boy guilty, but he would need concrete evidence of that and it seems he didn't have that but only circumstantial evidence which could easily point to the nanny.
That was largely a creation of the 1940's Holmes films. Watson in the books was never portrayed as bumbling. He was never on Holmes level (though few ever were) but he was always very competent. The early films changed him to the bumbling comic relief.
EDIT: I see Chamber-Music beat me to the punch on this one.