• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Fattest man in the world...is British?!?!

1 stone = 14 pounds.
So he weighs 980 lbs?! :wow:

EDIT: No. I think it's just because we don't use "stones" in North America.

Damn! That's half a ton!

Yup. He's made his bed now he should lay in it. Tough **** is what I say.

I understand there is medical conditions that make people fat. But this is just utter, utter gluttony.

There is no medical condition that make you this fat, it's just pure gluttony. The medical condition thing is a crook, it probably accounts for less than 10% of the people that are fat. Even then, they probably are over the weight that their medical condition makes them.
 
He doesn't pay taxes, he doesn't work. He hasn't been out of bed for like, 10 years.

The benefit system pays his taxes...

So yea, **** him.

Oh right. Only healthy taxpayers deserve to live. **** the blind, deaf, dumb, and fat. They don't pay taxes.

/hitler
 
No, only taxpayers who deserve it do. This guy has dug his own grave by being a greedy bastard all his life. Tough ****.
 
He deserves it simply because it is how the people of the UK wanted their health care system to be like (democratically speaking) and there is something to be said about consistency. Just like the people of UK empowered people like Brown to sell off the gold reserves at 200-300 an ounce (1060 now, it might hit 1100 soon heh). It is what it is.
 
Yep that happens a lot.

The government seem to reward people who can't keep their legs closed.

"Oh I don't have a job or my own house! That's ok, I'll just get preggers and the government will help me out!"

:dry:
That is the problem with a Liberal Goverment in the Modern Sense. America is right behind you so don't worry. It will soon be the norm.
 
He deserves it simply because it is how the people of the UK wanted their health care system to be like (democratically speaking) and there is something to be said about consistency. Just like the people of UK empowered people like Brown to sell off the gold reserves at 200-300 an ounce (1060 now, it might hit 1100 soon heh). It is what it is.

We didn't empower him to do nothing. He was the Chancellor, he did what he thought was best for the country on his own steam...he was wrong. There was no vote to "sell the gold Gordie!".

And I don't want the healthcare system to work like that.

As I said only the people who are truly deserving should get free healthcare, like cancer sufferers and the like. Or people in bad accidents or people who are stabbed, shot badly beaten up and so on.

Not people who bring it on themselves like this tubby ****er.
 
With the FairTax, fatty wouldn't have a pot to eat pudding from, huh?
 
I remember stories of girls who purposely get knocked up to get welfare in their teens (UK). Remember a story of this girl who had a couple children with god knows who the fathers were. Made a killing of welfare revenue. I think she got paid like 60k a year. Total expenses including medical for the children probably way more.

Women like that are a bad word or multiple bad words.

And this guy...is he a epic binge eater?
 
DACrowe is kind of right some sense, most countries or empires do move into more progressive political atmosphere inevitable. Of course most major countries and empires do end up bankrupting themselves as well. It's cyclical and inevitable. So I guess we should just savor what we still have.
 
That is the problem with a Liberal Goverment in the Modern Sense. America is right behind you so don't worry. It will soon be the norm.


yeah, lets take an extreme, like this... which account for what... .000000000001% of people in the world, and act like "see this is why I don't want to have universal coverage"... So sick of that excuse.... you take on extreme, and convey it so people think that there are millions of deadbeat, purposely unhealthy people that get free coverage, .... never mind that the vast majority of the middle class is being raped with buecratic BS.. where they can't afford insurnace because their boss wants to cut back on that, and take out life insurance policies on their workers, so when they die of prematurly, they get the money.... or that insurance companies raise rates becaue PEOPLE GET SICK, and use their paid for coverage, but they want to make sure each CEO gets the 6 figure quartley bonus ontime....
 
Oh right. Only healthy taxpayers deserve to live. **** the blind, deaf, dumb, and fat. They don't pay taxes.

/hitler

Well Ace of Knaves is making the point that this guy isn't a taxpayer. What can you do as a job at half a ton? If you can't work, you won't be paying taxes because you have no income.

I really can't understand how someone could let themselves get that big, even getting to the point where you can't leave your bed. Can you even do anything at that point to change your life? Who would even want to live at that point?
 
I remember stories of girls who purposely get knocked up to get welfare in their teens (UK). Remember a story of this girl who had a couple children with god knows who the fathers were. Made a killing of welfare revenue. I think she got paid like 60k a year. Total expenses including medical for the children probably way more.

you do realize they are not millions of women doing that... and the actually numbers are probably alot less then you think... plus, with all teh money these governments waste, the total amount of welfare people gets, accounts for not even 1 percent......

but again, you will blanket everyone who collects welfare into one category... that being deadbeats who are sucking on the governments tit... but in reality, there are many many people who need this just to live.... and it's because they want it, most are ashamed..... but because crap happened to them...
 
The reality is that it isn't .0000000000001% of people.

So many people do this to the NHS. Whether it is obesity, having kids they can't afford to raise and look after, claim incapacity benefit when there is nothing really wrong with them.
 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/h...pital-bosses-consider-helicopter-airlift.html

WOW! 70 ****ing stone!

This guy costs the taxpayer 100k a year. And to give him the operation on the NHS that he "needs" will cost the taxpayer more.

Don't mean to be harsh, but I say **** him.

The NHS is a great service...but they need to stop giving out free operations and medical attention to people like this. It should only go to people who REALLY need it, like cancer sufferers and the like.

Not lazy, greedy fat bastards who have no one else to blame but themselves.

Thoughts.


:wow::doh:
 
Well Ace of Knaves is making the point that this guy isn't a taxpayer. What can you do as a job at half a ton? If you can't work, you won't be paying taxes because you have no income.

I really can't understand how someone could let themselves get that big, even getting to the point where you can't leave your bed. Can you even do anything at that point to change your life? Who would even want to live at that point?

there needs to be a balance.... if someone, like this guy, who has obviously done this to himself, and is currently being a leach on the system... there needs to be penalties in place.... I for one would be in favor of him having to pay back the medical costs.... considering this wasn't a case of bad luck or something he was born with... this was a case of him not putting the fork down....

something that is self induced... .like lung cancer from smoking, or morbid obesity broung on, not just from genes, but a lifetime of self neglect and over eating, shoud have to be paid for by ones self... not the tax payer
 
there needs to be a balance.... if someone, like this guy, who has obviously done this to himself, and is currently being a leach on the system... there needs to be penalties in place.... I for one would be in favor of him having to pay back the medical costs.... considering this wasn't a case of bad luck or something he was born with... this was a case of him not putting the fork down....

something that is self induced... .like lung cancer from smoking, or morbid obesity broung on, not just from genes, but a lifetime of self neglect and over eating, shoud have to be paid for by ones self... not the tax payer

How is he gonna pay for it though? He can't work.

I say **** him, let him die.
 
The reality is that it isn't .0000000000001% of people.

So many people do this to the NHS. Whether it is obesity, having kids they can't afford to raise and look after, claim incapacity benefit when there is nothing really wrong with them.


then their needs to be system in place,

if it someone like this guy, someone needs to have the authority to deny him coverage due to this being a self induced problem...

same goes with mothers who constently have children, just for the money....

there are warning signs that appear, and when it happens, each offender should be denied or limited upon what they can recieve
 
then their needs to be system in place,

if it someone like this guy, someone needs to have the authority to deny him coverage due to this being a self induced problem...

same goes with mothers who constently have children, just for the money....

there are warning signs that appear, and when it happens, each offender should be denied or limited upon what they can recieve

Well they should be. But thanks to the EU Human Rights act, it isn't as simple as that.
 
How is he gonna pay for it though? He can't work.

I say **** him, let him die.


well, that needs to be discussed... for instance, maybe a council could inforce that he needs to find employment that he can do after the surgery, before the surgery happens...

it will be hard for him to do..... but, if he can not, then so be it....

considering what this guys food budget is, someone is buying him that food...
 
This is his own fault, taxpayer shouldn't be one to pay for his food addiction.....
 
Well they should be. But thanks to the EU Human Rights act, it isn't as simple as that.

you need to see where you stand... ussually everyone stance comes down to this prission scenero

would you imprisson 9 innocent people to lock up one guilty man

or

would you free 9 guilty people to free one inncocent man

the thing is... so many people need coverage, and most people are just down on their luck... sure, you get the ones who take advatage of the system... but why hurt 9 out of every ten... just because there is one, abbusing it...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,262
Messages
22,074,538
Members
45,875
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"