First negative review of CR and Craig hits the net - seems genuine

Have you all heard this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMmT2QU7FTo

Geez, some of the people running that Pierce Brosnan shrine have no clue at what they are getting themselves into. I mean, they aren't even Bond fans, for crying out loud. They are a bunch of obsessed-driven and eccentric lunatics. Pardon my name calling, but can somebody tell me what is their purpose other than boycotting Casino Royale, which is just wishful thinking, that will make them see that what they are fighting for is right? If you are a Bond fan, and I mean a true Bond fan, why would you be going to great lenghts at destroying something you love or adore? It just doesn't make sense to me, at all.
 
^^^

Agreed...a true Bond fan IMO is a fan of the charactor..not just the guy playing him.

I still think Lazenby could have surpassed Connery.
 
Lazenby surpass Connery?? No freakin way:o :oldrazz:
Connery is in a league of his own, every other actor will always be measured up against him BUT none shall surpass him, only come close.
Craig is definately what we need and yes, I agree with everything Jack Napier said. CR will rule and Craig is here to stay. I just hope the producers dont screw thing up after CR.
 
Agentsands77 said:
Go to the official site, open it up, and then go to "About the Film" and then click on "Videos" - there should be a whole set of "Making Of" featurettes for the film. The ones I'm specifically referring to are "Filming the Casino" parts I and II.

Thanks, I hadn't seen these before.
 
ROBOCOP CPU001 said:
^^^

Agreed...a true Bond fan IMO is a fan of the charactor..not just the guy playing him.

I still think Lazenby could have surpassed Connery.

But they are, they don't think this guy has what it takes to make a good interpretation of the character, hence why they are against him. I'm sure they wouldn't give a damn about Craig if he wasn't playing Bond.
 
The Trainman said:
Have you all heard this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMmT2QU7FTo

Geez, some of the people running that Pierce Brosnan shrine have no clue at what they are getting themselves into. I mean, they aren't even Bond fans, for crying out loud. They are a bunch of obsessed-driven and eccentric lunatics. Pardon my name calling, but can somebody tell me what is their purpose other than boycotting Casino Royale, which is just wishful thinking, that will make them see that what they are fighting for is right? If you are a Bond fan, and I mean a true Bond fan, why would you be going to great lenghts at destroying something you love or adore? It just doesn't make sense to me, at all.
Wow that bull**** site is just run by a stupid Brosnan fan-girl.

George Lazenby was in Live and Let Die? Umm no he wasn't. That host is a bit of an idiot.
 
TheVileOne said:
Wow that bull**** site is just run by a stupid Brosnan fan-girl.

George Lazenby was in Live and Let Die? Umm no he wasn't. That host is a bit of an idiot.
damn wtf too he was playing Living Daylights....... dumbasses lol....
 
AndrewBerger said:
What we've seen of Craig's delivery reminds me of the way Humphrey Bogart would handle humor; dry, witty and smooth. I love it!

oh you have to be kidding. Bogart's humor was bitting and dripping with scarcasm.
 
DarthSkywalker said:
oh you have to be kidding. Bogart's humor was bitting and dripping with scarcasm.

So is Craigs but Craig isn't being blatantly obvious withit, he has a more moodyish condescending approach when delivering his sarcasm.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"