Batman refers Robin as a soldier because he always deemed his crusade as a war. He took the pill againts Superman, because he couldn't defeat him and thus they had to fake his death, despite Superman working for the government, he still chose to not tell his secret.
I don't get your "old chum" complaiment, since the book was still filled with alot of humor, especially in the dialogue.
Your favorite Batman book is a story where Batman is a complete idiot however, that was amusing to learn.I mean, you dislike changes because you don't accept them, but you can totally buy the idea that Batman is the worst detective out there? Despite Year One showing his talents? Whaaaat?
I liked it because of exactly that. Batman is still learning in Long Halloween and I like to see that in Batman.
I like to see that Batman wasn't always right, that he made mistakes.
Just like in Year One.
As far as me saying "Old Chum" I was complimenting The Dark Knight Returns in the fact that Miller made Batman a darker character, getting rid of the goofiness that was attributed to Batman in the years before "Returns".
But, I may be answering this wrong because you said "Complaiment" so I'm not sure if you were saying "complaint", "compliment" or a mixture of both words.
So I wouldn't say I dislike changes, but I see how I could have worded my previous post better.
I didn't completely dislike "Returns", there are still aspects of it I like, a couple were found in my previous post.
And I definitely see that this is the wrong thread to post my opinions about "Returns" as mostly everyone who has commented on this thread likes the novel, but I did this in the hopes that someone could bring something out to make me go read "Returns" again.
Something I overlooked, that way I wouldn't be so closed-minded and negative against this novel.
Last edited: