SuperFerret
King of the Urban Jungle
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2004
- Messages
- 33,639
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 58
I'm a big fan of the various Law & Order series, and I've recently seen an episode where a rapist's lawyer was using his "genetic predisposition to violence" as a defense (the character's father had raped his mother), and it became a big "nature vs. nurture" debate in the courtroom.
I don't drink alcohol, at all. My father is an alcoholic (though he's been sober for years) and his father was an alcoholic, I undoubtedly have a genetic predisposition to alcoholism, which is the primary reason why I made the decision to not drink.
I was just thinking about it (brought upon by a comment about a possible genetic predisposition to obesity in another thread), and the question is, are we not still responsible for our actions despite what our genetics might say?
This applies to the things that we can control, such as violence, over-eating, drinking alcohol, etc. as opposed to things we can't, such as our eye or skin color, height, etc. Also, the question could be applied to the "Nuture" side of the debate, surely our upbringing has weight in who we become, but does it remove our liability in following to the logical conclusion?
I'm just wondering what you all think of this. Who or what has ultimate responsibility for our actions? Are we slaves to our genetic make-up and upbringing?
I don't drink alcohol, at all. My father is an alcoholic (though he's been sober for years) and his father was an alcoholic, I undoubtedly have a genetic predisposition to alcoholism, which is the primary reason why I made the decision to not drink.
I was just thinking about it (brought upon by a comment about a possible genetic predisposition to obesity in another thread), and the question is, are we not still responsible for our actions despite what our genetics might say?
This applies to the things that we can control, such as violence, over-eating, drinking alcohol, etc. as opposed to things we can't, such as our eye or skin color, height, etc. Also, the question could be applied to the "Nuture" side of the debate, surely our upbringing has weight in who we become, but does it remove our liability in following to the logical conclusion?
I'm just wondering what you all think of this. Who or what has ultimate responsibility for our actions? Are we slaves to our genetic make-up and upbringing?