DA_Champion
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2013
- Messages
- 12,106
- Reaction score
- 930
- Points
- 73
^ Clearly missed the entire point of my post.
I didn't mss your point, your point is simply incorrect.
^ Clearly missed the entire point of my post.
Or fans have become so spoiled with films like Transformers that are 100% action that they can't understand when enough is actually enough.
Point blank, if you're complaining that Godzilla wasn't shown enough in said film you should have that complaint for the original & many other classic monster movies. It's a trivial complaint & a useless double standard.
Probably one that I won't ever understand.
I never hear people complain about the lack of dinosaur action in JP1, or that Ledger's Joker was only in TDK for about 15 minutes. Don't see why its such a big deal for Godzilla. I felt his presence the entire time, despite the fact that there wasn't too much of him. Also, yeah this was a big homage to the original, in which we don't see Godzilla for about an hour in to the film, and that's for about 2 minutes before cutting away.
What would you have done with Cranston? His role in the film was finished. He wanted to see what killed his wife, that's it. So killing him didn't bother me. Also, it's funny you say that, because alot of people complain about the characters in Jurassic Park.
http://www.vulture.com/2013/04/what-blockbusters-could-learn-from-jurassic-park.html
http://moviemet.com/review/jurassic-park-dvd-review#.U8gUnqjPYck
http://davidsamateurpalaeo.blogspot.com/2013/11/musing-on-jurassic-park.html
"Spielberg is less assured in the department of character development and some of the actors give worse performances than the computer-generated creatures, but, with a landmark spectacle like this, who cares?"
http://www.radiotimes.com/film/8psc/jurassic-park
There's more, but you get my point. It's always been known JP was more anticipated for its Dinosaurs than characters. I'm not trying to talk bad about the film, mind you. JP is my favorite movie ever, but I'm not going to act as if the characters (outside of Malcolm) are really anything deep.
Jurassic Park's characters aren't any deeper than Godzilla's, but IMO the acting is better and the characters (or maybe actors) are more likable.
I never hear people complain about the lack of dinosaur action in JP1, or that Ledger's Joker was only in TDK for about 15 minutes. Don't see why its such a big deal for Godzilla. I felt his presence the entire time, despite the fact that there wasn't too much of him. Also, yeah this was a big homage to the original, in which we don't see Godzilla for about an hour in to the film, and that's for about 2 minutes before cutting away.
[B said:A Necessary Evil;29303661]What would you have done with Cranston? His role in the film was finished. [/B]He wanted to see what killed his wife, that's it. So killing him didn't bother me. Also, it's funny you say that, because alot of people complain about the characters in Jurassic Park.
Again, ITS NOT ABOUT THE TOTAL SCREEN TIME. Its the fact that that his presence in the film is pretty much tangential to the plot.You're the first, if not the only person who I've seen complain on these boards that he has nothing to do with the plot, most complain he isn't in it long enough. Yes, the story mainly focuses on the MUTO's, but the whole story with Wantanabe's character has to do with Gojira. Want a movie where a character has literally nothing to do with the plot? Watch TASM2, and tell me Electro's role in the film.
Also there's a ton of dinosaur scenes in Jurassic Park. For a comparison, imagine the great slow build up of the water rippling the plastic cups, with lex and Tim freaking out, the T-Rex shows up and roars and its really exiting- BUT THEN IT CUTS AWAY TO A LITTLE KID SITTING ON A COUCH
How they would manage to turn JP into a island broadcast is beyond me, as the films are completely self-contained on an island. This took place in parts of the world with teleprompters and such. Conjecture.
imagine if none that happened, if the film cut away because it was saving it all for 2 seconds of the "When Dinosaurs Ruled the Earth" banner fluttering down. Would Jurassic Park still be as great as it is? Would you praise it for its "restraint"?
Way to completely over-exaggerate my point. 2 seconds? Seriously?Also, "praise?" I did not praise the film in this regard of how much it cut away. In fact, that's one of my few complaints. The hawaii fight? Sure, first cut away, whatever. Not a big deal. Annoying, but nothing major. Then cutting away again? No, I didn't like that. However, I didn't mind Godzilla being in the film for the majority of the runtime. Quality over quantity, please. I'm sure, and hoping he'll be in the second film even more, but I don't need him in there every 30 seconds.
If solving the mystery of his wife's death was going to be the arc of Cranston's character, they didn't have to have him complete that arc in 20 minutes. Or you know, write more into the interplay between him and Ford, that also didn't have to be resolved so quickly.
Which develops certain characters even less, or makes the film even longer, as it takes longer to get back with Brody's wife and son. I don't believe it was completed until about 35-40 minutes or so, and once again, while not the most brilliant piece of storytelling ever, it felt complete and wasn't resolved in "20 minutes".
[
How they would manage to turn JP into a island broadcast is beyond me, as the films are completely self-contained on an island. This took place in parts of the world with teleprompters and such. Conjecture.
.
Tokyo celebrates Godzilla's return in style.
![]()
![]()
![]()