This will generate controversy both ends of the political spectrum. I'm not offended by the premise myself but I know other will probably take issue with it.
Even if the confederacy succeed in separating I doubt slavery would of continued until today. Most nations probably would of sanctioned and boycotted the Confederate nation like much of the world did to apartheid South Africa. The industrial revolution and cheap labor from poor immigrants would of quickened the demise of slavery if it continued as well.
This makes me uncomfortable in a way that The Man in the High Castle didn't, and I can think of two reasons why:
1. This is an American series. The Holocaust wasn't American, but slavery was, and it was probably the ugliest part of our nation's history.
2. There's a lot of racial tension these days.
So this set off warning bells before I even saw that the showrunners were white, or that people had issues with their handling of minorities in their other show. A lot of things get a negative reaction that gets reported in the media, like a half-Indian actress being cast for Jasmine, for example, but I think this will be especially bad. I'm betting HBO underestimated the pushback and that this'll never make it to air.
Can someone please explain to me what makes this any more controversial than Man in the High Castle? It's not as if the Confederacy is going to be the heroes in this show.
Spike Lee already did this over 10 years ago and it never made the news.
![]()