Hold the Lounge - Part 176

[Victarion]

Yea thats the Thundergun movie one where Dee gets stuck in the sewer

Sunny is the first comedy since...Married with Children that's honestly got me laughing.

 

[Reek]

between South Park and Always Sunny, I am set.

 

[Roose Bolton]

See I never did things just to do them... what am I going to do? Just jump on Roose's couch and grind my feet into it?

Yeah, I remember grinding my feet in Roose's couch.

 

[Reek]

 

[Roose Bolton]

 

[Reek]

Don't start with me, boy...

 

[Roose Bolton]

 

[Reek]

 

[Greens]

between South Park and Always Sunny, I am set.

Same.

 

[Reek]

 

[KRYPTON INC.]

are you going on another hype hiatus

Nah. But between the podcast and now getting back into regular training I will be cuttting down on my activity here probably.

 

[Greens]

What podcast? The one that died on May 16?

 

[Summoner]

I read grinding, and I read feet.

 

[Summoner]

18% for Warcraft

EIGHTEEN. Are you kidding me.

Then again, I stopped taking Rotten Tomatoes seriously. After all, it is the website which has Apocalypse lower then The Last Stand.

 

[Reek]

RT is not very reliable... but when something is as low as 18%.. it kind of is

 

[Summoner]

RT is not very reliable... but when something is as low as 18%.. it kind of is

I've thought that before, but when you actually question that statement... not really.

On most occasions, if a film has an 18% or lower, you will most likely avoid it (unless it's property you are already interested in - I watched Fantastic Four regardless of it's 9% because I am obliged to watch all superhero films), therefore you wouldn't know if you missed an underrated gem.

Let's be honest, regardless of whether or not you trust Rotten Tomatoes, you will live off of recommendations on most occasions before you watch a movie. If a movie has an 18%, you won't bat an eyelash.

As for me, GeekyGlassesTV said he liked it and his opinion is more reliable then RT (for me at least), and Chris Stuckmann is the closest I've come to a critic whose opinion coincides with mine on most occasions.

He just uploaded his review, I'll need to check that out. Then I'll consider whether or not I should watch Warcraft in cinemas.

 

[Summoner]

See, Stuckmann said there is enjoyment to be found.

Two handpicked favourite critics of mine said it wasn't as bad as the critics made it out to be, therefore I will consider it.

 

[Reek]

I watched F4 and it was worth every bit of its 9%. I didn't miss an underrated gem. And no one is going to miss one with Warcraft. The Warcraft fans will be all ******** about it but it's likely to be (and completely looks like) a disaster of a movie ala Eragon x10.

 

[Summoner]

I watched F4 and it was worth every bit of its 9%. I didn't miss an underrated gem. And no one is going to miss one with Warcraft. The Warcraft fans will be all ******** about it but it's likely to be, and completely looks like, a disaster of a movie ala Eragon x10.

I didn't say Fantastic Four is some underrated gem. I agree it is a bad film, but the reason you think most-to-all 18% or below films deserve their rating is because you likely haven't watched many.

I could be wrong. At the end of the day, it's just my interpretation!

 

[Greens]

The consensus seems to be that Warcraft isn't terrible... just mediocre. And sometimes that's worse than terrible. I'd rather watch a stupidly bad movie than a boring one.

 

[Victarion]

I watched F4 and it was worth every bit of its 9%. I didn't miss an underrated gem. And no one is going to miss one with Warcraft. The Warcraft fans will be all ******** about it but it's likely to be (and completely looks like) a disaster of a movie ala Eragon x10.

At least Eragon dropped the dwarves, not-orcs, and tried something different with Paolini's Ringwraith ripoffs.

Did I just defend Eragon?

Please don't take me out to the woodshed.

 

[Reek]

RT is not very reliable... but when something is as low as 18%.. it kind of is

I didn't say Fantastic Four is some underrated gem. I agree it is a bad film, but the reason you think most-to-all 18% or below films deserve their rating is because you likely haven't watched many.

I could be wrong. At the end of the day, it's just my interpretation!

At least Eragon dropped the dwarves, not-orcs, and tried something different with Paolini's Ringwraith ripoffs.

Did I just defend Eragon?

Please don't take me out to the woodshed.

If I take anyone to the woodshed, it's Summoner for saying I said most-to-all 18% or below films deserve their rating because I said when something is rated that low, Rotten Tomatoes is kind of reliable.

 

[Summoner]

The consensus seems to be that Warcraft isn't terrible... just mediocre. And sometimes that's worse than terrible. I'd rather watch a stupidly bad movie than a boring one.

Stupidly bad movie = The Last Stand

Boring one - Fant4stic

That good?

 

[Reek]

I can go ahead and guarantee (as ****** as it is) that Last Stand is better than Warcraft lol

 

[Victarion]

For me, its gotta be the Mario movie. Dumb and stupid but I'll sit down and watch it through. Same for Secret of the Ooze.