lol, fighting over comicbook semantics is hilarious.
I love it.
FIGHT!
FIGHT!
FIGHT!
lol
LMAO I know lol
Whenever he comes out with his comments I hear the pre-school race war theme from Wonder Showzen play in my head lol
lol, fighting over comicbook semantics is hilarious.
I love it.
FIGHT!
FIGHT!
FIGHT!
lol
Noooo, read my post again. You missed the point, againLMAO ok pal..says the man who disregards the death of captain marvel being a graphic novel when it was labeled as such lol what are you gonna try and say next? Supeman was the first big death in comics?
lol, fighting over comicbook semantics is hilarious.
I love it.
FIGHT!
FIGHT!
FIGHT!
lol
isn't it? this is by far the stupidest debate i've seen on these boards in a while.
No, actually I do. You don't understand that books written in trade form don't always come from comics series, and graphic novels aren't always first written in squarebound. That's always been the case, even when the first graphic novels were being marketed.Dude the point is is that you have no point and have no idea what your talking about. Period.
But Watchmen and Dark Knight Returns...those are, and always will be Graphic Novels. They don't have volume numbers on them, they aren't marketed in installments, they aren't episodic and they aren't part of a greater line.
I think you're confusing it with X-Men #1, that's the best selling single issue of all time. It sold seven million copies. X-Force #1 probably outsold the competition the month it came out, most #1(s) and final issues do that...but X-Men #1 came out not much later and eclipsed everything before it...despite being a f***ing confusing and overhyped issue.You know what's funny about X-Force #1 "holding" the record for best selling comic of all time
X-Force came out well before Spawn did. While I don't know this for a fact, I think what motivated the wave of first issues was "Spider-Man #1"...however Spawn does hold some value to it from what I understand. Not that much, but it's only a decade old.'cause they thought everything with a "#1" on it was going to be the next Spawn #1 and if they held onto it for 6 months it'd be worth $40,000.
I'd imagine X-Force sold very well it's first month, most first editions of first issues sell well...that's what often times motivates these restarts. However, That's been happening since at least the 60s. Stan Lee, when DareDevil came out for example (a perfect example of a book that was not successful to start off) he exclaimed "Remember [Amazing Spider-Man #1]...now we congratulate you with another prized first edition! This Magazine is sure to be one of your most prized possessions". DareDevil #1, of course, is worth quite a bit now...but ASM#1 pretty much b*tch slaps it across the face.Like, every new series broke the record, and held it, for,.......a month, and then, *p00f*, lol.
Not remotely true. Novels themselves, the book kind, are sometimes reprinted materials from magazines and periodicals. Most famously, the Sherlock Holmes novels all appeared in other print before being anthologized into novel form. I also believe James Bond's first book appeared in Intrigue Magazine before being published as a novel. So, no, what you say does not apply. Things can be rereleased in either trade or novel format in comics...originally printed or not. Either that or I guess you must consider Sherlock Holmes a tradepaperback.ThemanofBat said:It is funny that people will argue to the death about a body of work, but the bottom line is that a Graphic Novel is original works, and Trades are reprinted material. I feel bad that this definition upsets your comic book sensitivities, but that's how it is.
I think you're confusing it with X-Men #1, that's the best selling single issue of all time. It sold seven million copies. X-Force #1 probably outsold the competition the month it came out, most #1(s) and final issues do that...but X-Men #1 came out not much later and eclipsed everything before it...despite being a f***ing confusing and overhyped issue.
X-Force came out before Spawn did...however Spawn does hold some value to it from what I understand. Not that much, but a good bit for a decade old comic.
Not remotely true. Novels themselves, the book kind, are sometimes reprinted materials from magazines and periodicals. Most famously, the Sherlock Holmes novels all appeared in other print before being anthologized into novel form. I also believe James Bond's first book appeared in Intrigue Magazine before being published as a novel. So, no, what you say does not apply. Things can be rereleased in either trade or novel format in comics...originally printed or not. Either that or I guess you must consider Sherlock Holmes a tradepaperback.
X-Force came out well before Spawn did. While I don't know this for a fact, I think what motivated the wave of first issues was "Spider-Man #1"...however Spawn does hold some value to it from what I understand. Not that much, but it's only a decade old.
Last I checked Spawn 1 was worth between 8-15 bucks. Which isn't really all that much especially seeing as how you can find Spawn comics in the quarter bins these days.
And also, by your definition, printing the "Killing Joke" in a "Best of Alan Moore" trade makes part of the book a trade and part a graphic novel...which doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
Not remotely true. Novels themselves, the book kind, are sometimes reprinted materials from magazines and periodicals. Most famously, the Sherlock Holmes novels all appeared in other print before being anthologized into novel form. I also believe James Bond's first book appeared in Intrigue Magazine before being published as a novel. So, no, what you say does not apply. Things can be rereleased in either trade or novel format in comics...originally printed or not. Either that or I guess you must consider Sherlock Holmes a tradepaperback.
Your comparing apples and oranges man. Im wondering if you actually know the difference between a novel and a comic book.
Funny, how the minute you find something that disagrees "apples and oranges"Agreed... apples and oranges... apples and oranges.
And if you don't understand that, it means they're not the same thing.
![]()
Funny, how the minute you find something that disagrees "apples and oranges"![]()
Comics.are.literature.dummy.How things work in the literary world is a different bottle of wax.
Ok?
How things work in the literary world is a different bottle of wax.
Many Novels are illustrated. Some comics, including a recent Batman, are mostly block text written in book form.Ok let me translate this to you again Shadowboxing......He means 'how things work in the world of strictly books without pictures'. Understand now?
They teach "Watchmen" in Havard english courses. It's required reading at CofC for english in a course called "Modern American Novels".(Also if you knew as much about comics as you claim you'd know that it isn't seen as 'literature' hence the "comics are kids stuff" stigma it has.
Many Novels are illustrated. Some comics, including a recent Batman, are mostly block text written in book form.
They teach "Watchmen" in Havard english courses. It's required reading at CofC for english in a course called "Modern American Novels".
Comics.are.literature.dummy.
They teach "Watchmen" in Havard english courses. It's required reading at CofC for english in a course called "Modern American Novels".