Superman Returns How the new suit might be explained (speculation)

Milkman95 said:
Collora sure has a big ego for his little shoes. I liked him before he opened his big mouth. Do us a favor Sandy, let the actual professionals do their jobs - there is a reason guys like Bryan Singer are doing what they're doing and you're still doing fan-made films........

Yes, the shield is small because it's 3-D, who cares, it still looks great.
Haha, exactly. Repped, my good brother Milkman. :up:
 
Milkman95 said:
Collora sure has a big ego for his little shoes. I liked him before he opened his big mouth. Do us a favor Sandy, let the actual professionals do their jobs - there is a reason guys like Bryan Singer are doing what they're doing and you're still doing fan-made films........

Yes, the shield is small because it's 3-D, who cares, it still looks great.

Coincidently, Collora has probably the worst version of Superman I've ever seen in his 'World's Finest' short. Dean Cain was better than this guy!
 
Whack Arnolds said:
Haha, exactly. Repped, my good brother Milkman. :up:

Why thank you.

I agree SolidSnake........:up:
 
I have to say that every actor has to start somewhere.. there all bad until they get a little bit of training.
 
buggs0268 said:
And before anyone starts yelling at me, this is not meant to be an anti suit rant. I am just posting this information as historical information.

The guy who sculpted the body padding explained it to Sandy Collora why a lot of the changes, such as the reason for the high collar line is because they couldn't hide the padded suit with the low Collar line Superman has always had since 1942. And because Singer wanted a 3-D "S", that is why they had to make the shield so small or it would fold when he folded his hands. That is the only reason for that. They tried bigger and got nowhere. So it had nothing to do with it not looking liek a billboard on his chest. They could not get a 3-D Shield to work any bigger is all. Since the guy was sculpting the body padding, he was probably at every test with the thing and saw all that went on, and why the changes, as he probably had to make a few different padding sets himself to adjust to new changes in R&D. Collara came out with this in a blog on his website, even publically calling Singer a liar for saying there was no padded suit in the first USA Today article in his blof a week after the first pic and the article came out. Collora aparantly knows the guy who sculpted the suit faily well and had a conversation with him. Go to Collaras site and you can find the the blog on it that was posted a week after the suit was revealed.

1) The raised S isn't really a change, it's just a logical extrapolation of detail. Comic drawings are usually simplistic, they don't add details such as thickness of material etc. All the Batman movies have had 3D/raised bat-emblems... and no-one called that a "change". It just made sense and looked good.

2) Singer never said the suit wasn't padded. The first USA Today article said something like that but it never actually quoted singer as saying that - it was the journalist's inferrence/assumption, not Singer's statement. If Collara called Singer a liar for that, he was wrong.
 
Milkman95 said:
Collora sure has a big ego for his little shoes. I liked him before he opened his big mouth. Do us a favor Sandy, let the actual professionals do their jobs - there is a reason guys like Bryan Singer are doing what they're doing and you're still doing fan-made films........

Yes, the shield is small because it's 3-D, who cares, it still looks great.

Yeah, the guy has a huge ego. Personally I didnt like his fanfilm stuff. He has done some good effects work on other films and his old Pocari Sweat commercial (The underwater Soccer one) kicks all kinds of ass.

Pitty he acts like gods gift to comic book films :( And his website makes him out to be full of himself.

But he is a Surfer... :)
 
ROBOCOP CPU001 said:
you have got to like batman :dead end though..very good.

:up:

I thought it was pretty amusing :up: Plus it looked alot better than the embarassing 'Worlds Finest' (maybe it had something to do with being shot in the dark :D )
 
Mentok said:
I thought it was pretty amusing :up: Plus it looked alot better than the embarassing 'Worlds Finest' (maybe it had something to do with being shot in the dark :D )



could be..

:D

i liked both..but it just goes to show,,you could look very faithfull to the suits and storylines..but it looks silly on the big screen
 
Yeah... By the way ROBO... the bounty hunter dude 'Dog' scares the crap out of me :(
 
Mentok said:
Yeah... By the way ROBO... the bounty hunter dude 'Dog' scares the crap out of me :(


Really?

why is that..your not on the run from him are you.

:D
 
Heh Heh Collara. He shouldn't be saying anything negative about anybody. The guy's fan take on Worlds Finest was fantastic, but I don't know about calling Singer a liar.
 
Can anyone post a working link for the World's Finest movie/trailer?

Every time I try to look for it, I find bad links or get lost. Next thing you know I get too frustrated and give up...:(

Some help would be much appreciated
 
That's odd because I have hairs on my hand.
 
Showtime029 said:
Heh Heh Collara. He shouldn't be saying anything negative about anybody. The guy's fan take on Worlds Finest was fantastic, but I don't know about calling Singer a liar.

I personally thought DE was much better. WF was a disappointment. Doesn't Sandy know Bats only come out at night?
 
Milkman95 said:
I personally thought DE was much better. WF was a disappointment. Doesn't Sandy know Bats only come out at night?

I didn't mind WF, but I agree DE was better. I guess Sandy doesn't have The Batman down yet.
 
Milkman95 said:
Well, I'm sorry, but you're mistaken. If you look closely at Routh's suit, it's the highest quality one ever made, and the material is LIGHT YEARS better than what Reeve wore..............Routh's suit is very well made, and it's definitely up there with the quality of Maguire's Spider-man suits..........

Not to nit pick but you do know underarmor is a relaitivly new material.

So yeh I agree even though I still do not really like the suit that it is light years better quality than the one Reeves wore.
 
under armour?

oh you mean the muscle suit.. since 2002 with spidey and not to mention magnetos costume in X-men.
 
Damn. I dug WF for what it was.

I never really liked DE. Batman looked cool, but Joker was ass. And what the hell was with the random Predator/Aliens thing?


Sorry, back on topic.

I think it would be interesting, in the movie or not, to see Routh in a Reeve style suit.
 
ROBOCOP CPU001 said:
under armour?

oh you mean the muscle suit.. since 2002 with spidey and not to mention magnetos costume in X-men.

Yep yep both .
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"