DrCosmic
Professor of Power
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2011
- Messages
- 8,743
- Reaction score
- 49
- Points
- 33
The size changing seems pretty expensive, plus he can turn his hands into various weapons right? That sounds expensive.
Size changing isn't. It might have been expensive 25 years ago when 'Honey I Shrunk The Kids' was made, but nowadays it's super cheap.
Turning hands into weapons is only expensive if you show it in detail all the time. After the first change, you do it with flash cuts, if he even uses that power at all, much less often.
Except a lot of the characters have powers that could easily eat up a budget. Cyclops's eye beams, those are pretty expensive, Ice Man can't ice up, that would too expensive. Part of the reason why Cyclops got a reduced role in X-2, is because his powers were expensive.
Iceman is a character that would be expensive, I agree. His powers would have to be changed form turning into a CGI character making huge ice constructs constantly. Once you make that change to prosthetics and ice blasts, he's quite affordable, as he was in the X-Men films. You don't change Iceman's story one bit, you just change his visuals.
Cyclops' eye beams are actually very cheap, it's the damage they do that's expensive. You handle that by giving Cyclops what he has in comics now with the attitude he had in the beginning and in the X-Men anime: being truly and justifiably afraid to use his powers. Cyclops is a nuke, a last resort with catastrophic consequences for everyone. That's the X-Men story. If you follow it, he's affordable.
I don't believe for one minute that was the reason Cyclops had a reduced role in X-2.
You are still putting against a lot of characters with powers that would eat up a budget in no time. Not mention Phoenix's powers, not the telepathy, but the fiery bird effect, would be really expensive, would more expensive then Blackwater. Phoenix destroying a star system, pretty expensive. A character with god like powers is going to be expensive.
I don't think you are being realistic in terms of what you can do on a budget,
Unless Phoenix never really uses her powers in the show, you can't tell the Phoenix Saga on a TV budget. I think it would end up looking terrible if they tried it and who knows how many bottle episodes they would have to make to recoup their budget.
I'm being very realistic about what can be done. You're being unrealistic about how many visuals from comics need to be reproduced to do the X-Men justice. You seem to think Phoenix lit up all the time is 'doing the X-Men justice' whereas I think showing the Phoenix in costume in different parts of the universe experiencing a range of emotions dealing with a range of people and having a real natural emotional journey is doing the X-Men justice, even if she only uses her tv-affordable powers to do so, much less if we actually see the firebird once or twice.
For instance, Phoenix destroying a star system. This is a very expensive shot that might be twenty seconds long. Maybe. Outside of that, it's just another episode of the crazy inexpensive Star Trek. It doesn't compare to an hour long mutli-front battle with hundreds of extras that starts with a huge explosion.
She wouldn't have the fiery bird effect constantly like she did in comics, true. So? What if she only used it twice? Only sixty seconds of Phoenix Bird form for the whole season? Isn't that a better Phoenix than trying to cram a huge story into two hours just so you can show her Phoenix Bird form for ten minutes?
Like you said, her other powers are easily doable on a TV budget, it's just the fiery bird form. You limit that and all of a sudden you have ZERO problems.
The level of special effects to tell the story of the X-Men well on TV, simply do not exist. Can you name a TV show as special effect laden as the one you are proposing?
There are some super heroes that can work on a TV budget, the X-Men are not in that group.
Smallville, Heroes, LOST, Rome, Terra Nova. Heck, Star Trek or Buffy on a good year.