Rocketman
Superhero
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2010
- Messages
- 5,763
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
Well, thats how Batman looked like in comics at the time
![]()
Exactly. Looks like The Brave and the Bold.
Well, thats how Batman looked like in comics at the time
![]()
Well, thats how Batman looked like in comics at the time
![]()
I was never a fan of the West Batsuit, not that I have anything against the gray tights. I know it's not "realistic" because it's not a bullet proof armor suit but I could care less about that. All what matters is style. Number one the cape looked too short. Number two.... it looked like Batman had no ears in some scenes. Number three.... the eyebrows on the mask looked corny. Number four.... the mask looks too flat as if there's no structure to it. And number five.... if you don't have the physique of a body builder then stick to a muscle-armor suit. It worked for Keaton!
you forgetting the show was made in the early 60's?
has everything to do with it.
It was comic accurate but they could have done a better job with the details. It has nothing to do with the time period.The Batman of the 60's show looked exactly like the Batman of the comics at the time.
Unlike the Adam West cowl, in that image his ears aren't leveled with the tip of his head. This is why it's hard to notice his ears in some scenes. BTW when I said the cape looked too short I wasn't suggesting it should drag to the floor.He had a short cape, and little ears...hell just look at the pic six posts up and compare that to the Adam West suit.
Obviously you don't watch many shows and films from the "goo ol' days". I could make a big list but I'll narrow it down to The Adventures of Superman and the Batman serials. But it's funny how you took the muscular suit so literal. Like I said, it was a figure of speech.In the 60's what we consider muscular is different that what we consider to be muscular nowadays....and a muscle suit in the 60's would have looked a billion times more silly than people believe this suit to be.
In the future, I would love a blue and gray suit in a movie.
To me, the perfect Batman movie would be this:
- Schumacher's Gotham from Batman Forever.
- The serious tone and acting from Nolan's films.
- Batman's suit is strictly from the comics.
- It's still a kid's movie, but it's serious enough for adults.
- Nothing TOO adult-oriented like Batman Returns.
- Suspension of disbelief, but NOTHING campy or silly or ridiculous.
- The soundtrack from the Animated Series.
- Don't be afraid of COLOR. Where Nolan stuck to blue and brown tones, and Burton stuck to black and white tones, I want to see some creative purples and oranges and greens in Gotham. In other words, Schumacher's Gotham didn't bother me at all - it was the bat-suits and nipples, and the terrible acting. If you press the Mute button on your remote and ignore the nipples, the movie looks gorgeous. Nolan's films are kind of cold and lifeless when muted.
Basically:
- Nothing from Batman & Robin.
- Nothing from Burton's movies.
- NONE of the suits from Burton, Schumacher, or Nolan.
- Keep it PG-13.
- Keep Nolan's tone and great acting.
- Keep Schumacher's Gotham from Forever.
I don't think there's ever been a perfect Batman film, but I think there's been a perfect Batman when you combine elements from all the films and mix it into one thing. One movie has great color, another movie has great acting, another movie has a serious tone, another movie is campy and stupid, another movie has terrible acting, another movie looks cold and dark. They all have something perfect while also having something that completely misses the mark.