Mindreaper21
?????
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2008
- Messages
- 2,676
- Reaction score
- 1,241
- Points
- 103
Yes! Now that would be fascinating.
A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.
Yes! Now that would be fascinating.
It was done as perfectly as one could do it in a film.done perfectly? wouldn't say all that
Really think they shouldn't touch Two-Face origin at all in this incarnation. We're only gonna get 2 more movies, it'd feel like a waste of time to spend time on any of them remixing what was already done perfectly in TDK, even if you add new elements or whatever. Let's focus on other stories.
It is not a rule that just because all those elements are there you /need/ to do Harvey Dent. But even then, I'm not even arguing against having Harvey in the films at all. Just doing the whole Two-Face origin. If they wanted to play around and make it so he's already Two-Face, or he never becomes Two-Face, or they do the Jessica Dent thing maaaaybe there could be something there but it really doesn't matter if they add Gilda or whatever, there are very very specific story beats that the traditional Two-Face origin follows (White knight DA > Partnership with Batman and Gordon > Tragedy > Face burnt off) that's just bound to come across as repetitive from TDK if you put it on a screenplay.He was absolutely nowhere near “perfect” in that film. Also, who said that it would even be a remix? There’s other ways to approach his character that would work great for this saga. They don’t even have to spend the entire film telling his origin.
You’re not going to have a Batman detective crime saga that includes Salvatore Maroni, a rising/ongoing gang war, and an empty D.A. slot and not include one of the most important characters in telling that side of the story.
Reeve’s is doing an excellent job in world building and establishing the characters he wants to use so far. 3 films and multiple tv series in between is certainly enough time focus on other storylines.
An idea I guess they could play around is make it like the Gotham by Gaslight animated movie where they use Dent as a red herring. Maybe he becomes a suspect in an investigation or something, and you keep waiting the whole movie to see him crack, and perhaps comment on his DiD with that, but he never does. If they want to make it really dark they can make it so that makes it so he gets attacked and his face burnt off but he just dies from that like in Earth One. Would be interesting meta-commentary on how people with DiD are unfairly maligned. But again I'm really not sure how much I'd actually want to see a good chunk of the next two movies dedicated to that.Dent’s origin in TDK is head and shoulders better than any other version. When Invader and I agree on something it must be true!
TDK does everything TLH does but way better and the animated series origin is great but it’s also something that would be horrendously offensive now, plus the Jekyll and Hyde portrayal of DID is stupid and cheesy on top of being offensive.
Dent’s origin in TDK is head and shoulders better than any other version. When Invader and I agree on something it must be true!
TDK does everything TLH does but way better and the animated series origin is great but it’s also something that would be horrendously offensive now, plus the Jekyll and Hyde portrayal of DID is stupid and cheesy on top of being offensive.
If they make Henri Ducard Ra's Al Ghul again like they did in the Nolanverse...then Vincent Cassel would actually be perfectIf, for whatever reason, Reeves wants to work in the actual Henri Ducard character at some point…
Vincent Cassel
"Ah, ****, here we go again"We will probably find out his name is Robin soon
If they make Henri Ducard Ra’s Al Ghul again…they will be making a royal clustercuss.If they make Henri Ducard Ra's Al Ghul again like they did in the Nolanverse...then Vincent Cassel would actually be perfect