Chris Wallace
LET'S DO A HEADCOUNT...
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2001
- Messages
- 35,629
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 31
Some of us-MANY of us-didn't ask for any "innovation"! We were happy w/Spidey the way he was.
Chris Wallace said:Some of us-MANY of us-didn't ask for any "innovation"! We were happy w/Spidey the way he was.
Chris Wallace said:Some of us-MANY of us-didn't ask for any "innovation"! We were happy w/Spidey the way he was.
That's some bull. It NEVER occured to me that they would ever expose him. He's got too much to lose by his identity being a matter of public record. And since neither Superman nor Batman's identities have been outed, that argument just doesn't fly.FadingCB said:Plus, you honestly couldn't have thought he would stay masked forever. Based on his popularity, it was inevitable that eventually he'd be unmasked to hype some huge event, it just happened sooner than most seemed ready for.
Right now the story's still developing & there's still entertainment value. Doesn't mean that the unmasking wasn't a bad move.Darthphere said:I havent seen any dramatic sales drop in the Spidey titles, so apparently people werent that outraged and arent out there burning copies of CW #2.
Chris Wallace said:Right now the story's still developing & there's still entertainment value. Doesn't mean that the unmasking wasn't a bad move.
Maybe not. But right now it doesn't look good.Darthphere said:Theres no way you can judge #3.
Chris Wallace said:That's some bull. It NEVER occured to me that they would ever expose him. He's got too much to lose by his identity being a matter of public record. And since neither Superman nor Batman's identities have been outed, that argument just doesn't fly.
Ah, the battle-cry of the disillusioned. It makes for such dulcet tones in my bitter, cynical ears.Anubis said:I don't even give a damn anymore.