matthooper
Sidekick
- Joined
- May 15, 2002
- Messages
- 2,183
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
The problem for me is that Singer refused to make a Superman movie. He made a Bryan Singer movie. You could replace the character arc of Superman in SR with the arc of Wolverine, Dean Keaton, or many of his other "lost" characters searching for their roots. Even if Singer knows the character, he refused to put the true character onscreen. Superman is not a lost soul. The great directors can put there stamp on a film, while making a film unlike their previous films.
He wanted to use the Donnerverse as a template but the movie lacked Donner's humor and grace. It lacked vision. Reeves had the "it" factor. He had the boyish charm, the sense of humor, and the power. Routh, although not bad, lacked all these qualities. Not that it mattered because Singer gave him nothing to do.
I'm biased, I don't want him to do another because nothing I've seen from Singer shows he can do better. I like The Usual Suspects, but nothing from that film shows he can do a good Superman. I was dissapointed in both X-Men films as well. Nothing from the X-Men comics translated into his movies. Once again he puts Wolverine as the lost soul searching for his roots.
He wanted to use the Donnerverse as a template but the movie lacked Donner's humor and grace. It lacked vision. Reeves had the "it" factor. He had the boyish charm, the sense of humor, and the power. Routh, although not bad, lacked all these qualities. Not that it mattered because Singer gave him nothing to do.
I'm biased, I don't want him to do another because nothing I've seen from Singer shows he can do better. I like The Usual Suspects, but nothing from that film shows he can do a good Superman. I was dissapointed in both X-Men films as well. Nothing from the X-Men comics translated into his movies. Once again he puts Wolverine as the lost soul searching for his roots.