Iron Man 2 Iron Man sequel Title

  • Thread starter Thread starter Penguin
  • Start date Start date
Not sure if that would work, they may try something different. Maybe his tech isn't alien but is just highly advanced since he's a evil genius and all.
 
Ya, that definately sounds like a possibility.

Im curious to see what they will do.

--dk7
 
I Agree with jordacar, there's too many Rise Of's
we need something simple like Iron Man II or The Golden Avenger
 
Anything but Iron Man 2. C'mon Marvel, put some thought into it. An infant can come up with that. We're pretty much guaranteed to have a sequel at this point.
 
Iron Man - WM
Iron Man - War Machine
or Iron Man - Demon in the Bottle.

but Iron Man 2 makes it for me.
 
I say save Armor Wars for the third movie
 
Iron Man : Upgrade 2.0
Iron Man : The Enemy Within
Iron Man : Mark 3.5
Iron Man : War Machine Technology
Iron Man : In The Heart of the Battle
 
Iron Man: 2.0

The Invincible Iron Man

The Golden Avenger
 
Just as long as it's not Rise of the Mandarin.

Not because I don't want to see the Mandarin, I've just had enough "Rise of"s, after Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines, FF: Rise of the Silver Surfer, Ultimate Avengers 2: Rise of the Panther, and coming up, Underworld: Rise of the Lycans.
What about Rice of the Manderin? :grin:
 
I'll go along with many. The Invincible Iron Man sounds like a decent sequel title.
 
ironman
ironman2: war monger (aludes to war machine and possibly the return of ironmonger)
the invincible ironman
 
perhaps no extra stuff on the ends? x2: x:men united, x3: the last stand, punisher: warzone, superman IV: the quest for peace

why not just ironman, ironman 2, ironman 3.....its simple and effective
 
I don't know if Invincible Iron Man is appropriate if the movie is going to be darker, introspective, and focusing largely on Tony's alcoholism. I think that Incredible Iron Man sounds even more "family friendly" which will be weird if its a darker movie. I don't know, normally I hate when movies are just Iron Man 2 or Iron Man 3 with no thought in the title, but sometimes maybe that's the way to go.

I like 2.0 or mark II....But I still think that if someone had a good real title for a movie then use that. The title should be about a movie. Look at Star Wars, in episode 5, the empire strikes back, hence the title. So not really knowing what the plot is to the movie yet kind of makes it hard to assign it a name...
 
I was just going to ask about the tittle, he.

Do you think they could call it just "Ironman 2"?
 
IIron Man
I think thats pretty clever actually.
I like it, that should be the title...but Im almost positive there will be a few dunces who wont get it and probably think its a typo.
 
I think thats pretty clever actually.
I like it, that should be the title...but Im almost positive there will be a few dunces who wont get it and probably think its a typo.

guilty:csad:....at first i was thinking "what is he going for with this one? is he joking? can he not type?"....then after a moment i had one of those "oh i see what you did there" kinda moments.

its too damn early to deal with clever people:cwink:


i like IIron man....kuddos to you batjeff
 
Part 2: The Invincible Iron Man

Part 3: The Golden Avenger
 
why not call the second one 'Tony stark'

since it is going to concentrate hopefully more on him than iron man.

a superhero film has yet to be named after a character's alias.

it'd be cool, unique and hopefully a trend setter for sequel titles in the future.
 
Shellhead: Iron Man 2


Seriously, lay off the comic book titles/hero's sub name for movie titles. Iron Man 2 is fine.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"