samsnee
Ok
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2006
- Messages
- 23,489
- Reaction score
- 16,768
- Points
- 103
Seems like certain fanbases of certain franchises are getting more and more demanding.
https://news.avclub.com/rian-johnson-and-christopher-mcquarrie-have-pretty-diff-1827363452
I guess it all started when Christopher McQuarrie was asked on Twitter:
To which he responded:
Of course, there were some that didn't like that answer and said he should "grow a pair".
This eventually led to James Mangold chiming in:
https://io9.gizmodo.com/logan-director-james-mangold-warns-that-fandom-backlash-1827432164
Between some studios being more rigid in how they want to build their cinematic universes and franchises, and then backlash from fans who didn't see on screen what they envisioned, I can definitely understand why directors and possibly actors would stay away. Of course, the nice paycheck will always be an enticement for younger talent, but why would more established directors take the risk?
You spend two years or more of your life developing it, then it comes out, people either love it or hate it, and then you get asked for the next two years during every other interview for whatever project you are on, when the sequel is coming out. I'm surprised Matt Reeves is still attached to Batman to be honest.
I wasn't a fan of Last Jedi and not because they chose to have a more diverse cast. I'll be more hesitant to pay to see the next one. But I've never understood why other "fans" insist on constant harassment of the director or actors. It's just a movie at the end of the day.
https://news.avclub.com/rian-johnson-and-christopher-mcquarrie-have-pretty-diff-1827363452
I guess it all started when Christopher McQuarrie was asked on Twitter:
Is it possible for an audience or viewer to give legit, constructive criticism on a film, based on that film's merits, without the person being labeled as toxic or insure or a racist or sexist in this day and age? How do you handle legit viewer criticism?
To which he responded:
The answer is in your question. There is a distinct and obvious difference between criticism and bullying.
Constructive criticism serves film. Bullying serves the bullys impotence.
And I handle criticism the same way I handle death: I aim for dignity and hope I manage.
Of course, there were some that didn't like that answer and said he should "grow a pair".
This eventually led to James Mangold chiming in:
https://io9.gizmodo.com/logan-director-james-mangold-warns-that-fandom-backlash-1827432164
At the point when work writing & directing big franchises has become the emotionally loaded equivalent of writing a new chapter of The Bible (w/ the probable danger of being stoned & called a blasphemer), then a lot of bolder minds r gonna leave these films 2 hacks & corp boards.
Between some studios being more rigid in how they want to build their cinematic universes and franchises, and then backlash from fans who didn't see on screen what they envisioned, I can definitely understand why directors and possibly actors would stay away. Of course, the nice paycheck will always be an enticement for younger talent, but why would more established directors take the risk?
You spend two years or more of your life developing it, then it comes out, people either love it or hate it, and then you get asked for the next two years during every other interview for whatever project you are on, when the sequel is coming out. I'm surprised Matt Reeves is still attached to Batman to be honest.
I wasn't a fan of Last Jedi and not because they chose to have a more diverse cast. I'll be more hesitant to pay to see the next one. But I've never understood why other "fans" insist on constant harassment of the director or actors. It's just a movie at the end of the day.