seishin87 said:There's more to his eyes than just a scar. He cries tears of blood, including while at the poker table. Very bone-chilling indeed.
Mr. Vice said:Are you serious?
seishin87 said:Yes.
Infact.....
From the script Le Chiffre talking to a retired croatian general at a poker game. Le Chiffre: "My dear general, weeping blood comes merely from a derangement of the tear duct. Nothing sinister." The general still blanches at this comment.
seishin87 said:Yes.
Infact.....
From the script Le Chiffre talking to a retired croatian general at a poker game. Le Chiffre: "My dear general, weeping blood comes merely from a derangement of the tear duct. Nothing sinister." The general still blanches at this comment.
SpyderDan said:Well that's pretty...quirky, I guess. I'll wait and see how it works on screen before saying anything.
johnsonuk said:a bigger better quality pic..http://latinoreview.com/filmpreview_image.php?id=5048
BoBByJoMo said:I would of much rather preferred him to have no scar and look as realistic as possible. I mean, isn't that what the producers want? A realstic Bond, a new,s serious take on the iconic character...So why have the villain wear some cheesy scar makeup and bring us right back to square one.
There's a difference between bringing Bond down-to-earth and losing everything that makes Bond "Bond" in the first place. Bond, even at his most realistic, has always featured what I refer to as "elements of the bizarre."BoBByJoMo said:I would of much rather preferred him to have no scar and look as realistic as possible. I mean, isn't that what the producers want? A realstic Bond, a new,s serious take on the iconic character...So why have the villain wear some cheesy scar makeup and bring us right back to square one.
Yellow Cyclone said:and now chiffre...i know its bond and all, but audience is going to walk in and and see scar dude #x and be all "oh snap that's the villain"
seishin87 said:That's exactly what they want the audience to think.
coudn't have said it better myselfBoBByJoMo said:Why? Having distorted faces on villains doesn't make them any more sinister, yet it does make it a bit more hard to believe and cheesier. I mean, seriously, why does every villain have to have a jacked up face. I think Zao and 006 both had scars, yet they were obtained during the film, making it believable.
But seriously, the scary thing about evil is that it can come in any form. It raises the element of suprise, which would be a nice little change from the current style of Bond Films.
BoBByJoMo said:Why? Having distorted faces on villains doesn't make them any more sinister, yet it does make it a bit more hard to believe and cheesier. I mean, seriously, why does every villain have to have a jacked up face. I think Zao and 006 both had scars, yet they were obtained during the film, making it believable.
But seriously, the scary thing about evil is that it can come in any form. It raises the element of suprise, which would be a nice little change from the current style of Bond Films.