Personally, I didn't think it was nearly as good as everyone is saying. The obvious flaws that stick out to me:
- The plotting was kind of uneven. Not that that's particularly new to James Bond movies, but I'm never a fan of Bond movies were the pacing, structure, and overall meaning of the film changes halfway though the movie.
- Silva bounced back and forth between being a really awesome Ledger-esque villain, to a ridiculously over the top and almost comedic one. Which, I think, was mainly due to poor dialogue moreso than Bardom's performance.
- The dialogue was pretty spotty at times in general. It pretty consistently crossed the line between clever and campy, which definitely kind of disengaged me from an otherwise serious film.
- All of the references to the Connery Bond films were absolutely terrible. Not a single one of them felt natural or organic to the film itself. They all played off as if the writers and director were simply going "Hey guys, look what we're doing! We're tying everything to together, isn't that awesome?!" It wasn't. As most of it was unneeded, and, again, disengaged me while watching it.
- This is more of a personal preference, but I honestly don't like how much they revealed about James Bond's origins. Not because it should be a secret, or because no other movie has done it before, but rather, these Craig movies have done SUCH a great job of characterizing Bond as a really tough, angry and mysterious figure, that I honestly spent most of his three films trying to decipher what it was that made this guy so cold and psychotic, so hardened and resolute, and I think they should've left us guessing as an audience.
Early on in the film, I thought I heard Bond's accent in one scene slip to a more cockney, lower-class British accent, and I loved that. It instantly made me start wondering if all of Bond's sophistication and style was covering up a core that was nothing more than an Everyman, a commoner. And rather than have that mystery continue to exist, we found out everything, and for no real reason outside of needing a place to finish the final act.
Some things I'm okay with, but still not entirely sold on:
- We've known since Casino Royale that Craig's Bond was resolutely different from any of the other Bonds. As I said above, harder and colder than he's ever been before. But I can't help but wonder if what was revealed and what transpired in Skyfall really definitively stated that this is very much a different character from the Bond of the previous films. I can't imagine him ever growing into Sean Connery's Bond. Which, really, isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it certainly is different, and you can feel that stark contrast through most of the film. Even moreso than in CR or QOS.
- The younger and the more expanded supporting cast for Bond also surprised me. In some cases, I think they were a bit too unbelievably young, in others, they merely felt unnecessarily and really distracted from who Craig's Bond is - again, merely more lip service to classic Bond films. Again, not technically bad, but the movie didnt quite sell me on any of it.
Things I did like:
- The action was great, of course. Particularly the first action sequence was one of the best of any Bond movie - and just visually, the entire film was veryin kinetic and engaging.
- All of the actors really did do a nice job with what they had to work with. Craig, Bardom, Dench, etc. we're all great, and definitely added to the quality of the film.
- The score was phenomenal. It really dictated the tone and emotion of the movie in nearly every single scene. And while it might not be as memorable a score as, say, a Stae Wars or Batman, the actual music actually made me FEEL a lot more an those other scores ever did.
- The direction. Sam Mendes is an extremely good director, and it was plainly obviously throughout the entire movie. From the underlying emotional themes he conveyed through imagery and his actors performances, to just the brutal and emotional feeling that he injected into every scene, you could tell he was really putting his all into the film, and trying to make it something massive, meaningful, and definitive.
So yeah, essentially, I think the overall issue with the movie was the script. To me, it seemed like the screenwriters were by far the least talented and skilled people involved in the movie, and that kind of dragged what could've easy been something great - maybe even the greatest - down to merely good.