Saw this last night and enjoyed it. My theater was empty, though, and I wish I had gotten to see it with a packed house.
I don't think a Crooked Man spin-off would be a good idea. Most of the reviews that were negative point that out as being the part that jumped the shark for them. Also, the Nun was much scarier, so, it makes more sense to go with that.
Just realized that the ghost boy with the white eyes is based on this photo.
![]()
A bit too much fat on this second entry. I didn't think there were any sequences as well put together as many parts of the first film. The crooked man could have been cut out entirely and the only thing lost would have been some iffy effects work.
James Wan not directing
No Wan? BoooooooooooooSpeaking with Cinema Blend, producer Peter Safran updates that everything is moving along on the Conjuring 3 front, with David Leslie Johnson (The Conjuring 2) penning the script.
“It’s actually coming along great,” Safran told the site. “David Leslie Johnson is working on the screenplay, and I feel pretty confident they will have that one up and running next year.”
At this time, we don’t yet know where the third film will take Patrick Wilson‘s Ed Warren and Vera Farmiga‘s Lorraine Warren, but we at Bloody Disgusting have heard that James Wan will *not* be directing The Conjuring 3.
It was never proven that the Amityville case was a hoax though?
The Lutz's even on their deathbed maintained they were truthful and that it wasn't a hoax, as well as passing a lie detector test(I know a person can fake a lie detector), and while there will always be speculation as to whether or not it happened. I have to say that I believe Amityville was very real and the claims themselves are creepy, ridiculous, and outlandish as a whole that they were risking massive ridicule by making their experiences known to the public.
I love the first two films. No Wan definitely sucks, but hopefully they get someone who can get close. I could watch the adventures of those two forever with Vera and Patrick in the roles.