The Question
Objectivism doesn't work.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2005
- Messages
- 40,530
- Reaction score
- 24
- Points
- 58
DavidTyler said:Julian, Neil had nothing to do with the Superman Sandman saga other then drawing the cover for 'Kryptonite No More' which began it. I have every issue. They were drawn by Swanderson (and if you get that reference you win a gold star) and written by a few writers - O'Neil being one of them.
As to Byrne trying to make Superman a 'darker' character ... where did you get that idea? Byrne even tried to make Batman lighter. He's not a fan of dark heroes. The Demon was a departure for him.
What Byrne did in essence was to take the myth and make it more tangible. Kal-el's journey was given a semi-realistic revamp. Gone was the image of an infant being bounced around inside the cockpit of a rocket while starving and dehydrating. Baby Kal was now in a suragate womb which took care of all his needs until being birthed on Earth. It didn't make him any less an alien but it did make his arrival more believable. Incidentally, Bryne originally wanted to have a pregnant Lara make the journey. The powers that be at DC nixed the idea. If you don't like what he did, part of the blame lies squarely with them.
Because of this, Byrne was given the opportunity to give Krypton a lot more depth. No longer was Krypton this myopically ideal place that was about as interesting as cardboard. It was now a concept that rivalled 'Logan's Run' as a science fiction concept. A society so advanced that it had become sterile and repressive. Jor-el didn't just save his son from a dying planet but from a dying civilization as well.
And, the fact that the society was so up it's own ass mad their ignorance to their impending doom make sense. Only a people who are so arrogant that they see themselves as gods would ignore the idea of a major natural disaster wiping them out without even looking at Jor-El's findings.
As for the thing about him being born Superman. That's bullcrap. He was born super, yes. But he wasn't born Superman. He couldn't have been. Heroes aren't born. They are shaped by their life experiences. He became the man he is because of his life experiences on Earth. The fact that he's super has nothing to do with it. If he had been raised on Krypton, he probably would have been a very different person. If he'd been raised by any Earth couple other than the Kents, he'd probably be a very different person. If he'd been raised alongside Lex Luthor as a child, he'd probably have ended up as his "brother's" cheif enforcer. If he'd been raised by the Wayne's, he'd probably just as psychologically damaged as Bruce and far more brutal in his methods. If he didn't have powers but had simply been raised by the Kents like a normal human, he'd be exactly the way he is now. Except he'd probably concentrait all of his efforts in helping people by exposing the truth through journalism, not fighting crime or saving lives directly. The idea that he was "born" Superman is ludicrous.