ernesth100
The Writing Avenger
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2015
- Messages
- 11,123
- Reaction score
- 410
- Points
- 73
I wish we could have Punisher, Captain America and Wolverine interact. Three men of war and strategy. Too bad...reallt too bad.
I honestly hate it when anyone calls The Punisher one dimensional, he is a complex and interesting character to analyze in relation to being a necessary evil many people wish existed. His trauma and motivations to why he is where is is by itself is truly worth speaking about.
Anywya, Gnucci or Costa family would be great, if they adapted "Welcome Back, Frank" I'd be excited.
Oh come on. "You killed my family, I am going to kill you." It is the most one dimensional trope imaginable. Its not a deep or complex psychological motivation. It is a cliche. Even during the Ennis run (which I think we can all agree is the Punisher at his best) it is .
Oh come on. "You killed my family, I am going to kill you." It is the most one dimensional trope imaginable. Its not a deep or complex psychological motivation. It is a cliche. Even during the Ennis run (which I think we can all agree is the Punisher at his best) it is one dimensional.
You're right, the character can be used to explore some complex and interesting topics such as grey morality, doing evil things for good reasons, whether the ends justify the means, etc. But even in those stories, these subjects are not explored through the Punisher himself (who is too one dimensional and singularly motivated for that) but rather through characters around him and how his actions impact them. The Punisher is a one dimensional character. His more complex stories come when he is an ancillary character and we explore the impact he has on others. Even in his own stories this is how he works the best.
It is why I think he is best used as a supporting character rather than a lead. The Punisher as an uncompromising, amoral, force of nature, impacting other characters is far more interesting than trying to add depth to a character who really doesn't have much. Exploring the psyche of the Punisher is about as pointless as exploring the psyche of a hurricane. Instead, the better story is viewing the effects that this hurricane has on those around it.
My point is, while he does open some interesting doors for storytelling and I am excited to see him join the Marvel Cinematic Universe for that reason, he, himself, just is not very interesting.
The things with the Punisher he is very black and white. Criminals are bad and deserve to die, no qualms about it.
If they try to make him like every other anti-hero on TV and show him racked with guilt from time to time about what he does then he is not the Punisher.
Characters like DD and Jessica Jones they often second guess what they do or why they do it, that's not Punisher so I have a hard time seeing him support a show in the same way.
As I mentioned even in the Ennis MAX run it's much about the overall world and other characters or more so, than it is about Frank Castle.
I see Frank Castle as a serial killer like Dexter, or Hannibal. In the sense he's a killer you can root for. When they go into their reasoning for killing this person or that person, you know it's crazy talk, but you can find sound logic in it.
Agree 99%. The only part I don't agree with is the highlighted part. There was a point in time in the comics where Frank would kill people for jaywalking. That's a tadbit extreme.I don't think Frank Castles should be portrayed as serial killer. Frank doesn't particular kill for some type of self gratification usually and isn't a ritualistic killer. Frank used to be shown to spare criminals when they sowed genuine signs of remorse and reform. Some comics over the years have certainly made him a serial killer but usually he sees killing criminals no different from killing enemy combatants in a war as he is in a self declared war on organised crime. He does still have moral and ethical codes about not hurting innocent people. The Punisher also stakes outs and builds a solid profile of of the criminals he targets before killing them.
I think one the interesting debates in the comics is the question of Franks sanity. He has obvious signs of mental illness in the case of PTSD and antisocial personality disorder.
The other heroes kill in the Marvel universe and no one complains too much about it so I'm not sure why they would with the Punisher. There were a lot of people who rooted for Hannibal on that show even though he was a awful monster.
I don't think audiences have to like Frank Castle or agree with him but as long as you understand his reasoning for why he does the things he does then that should be fine.
The types of people The Punisher goes after are also usually awful criminals that are shown to be doing terrible things in the comics.
Agree 99%. The only part I don't agree with is the highlighted part. There was a point in time in the comics where Frank would kill people for jaywalking. That's a tadbit extreme.
I also think the reason Frank hasn't been brought to film properly is because people have tried two different extremes with him. In the Jane film, they were trying to turn a R rated character into a PG-13 one which doesn't always work out. In the Steven's movie, they just went all hardcore and cartoony which is a horrible mix and it showed. I honestly think Netflix is the best place for him. The way Marvel handled the Kingpin has given me complete confidence that they can do it right.
Totally agree with your views, man!I don't think Frank Castles should be portrayed as serial killer. Frank doesn't particular kill for some type of self gratification usually and isn't a ritualistic killer. Frank used to be shown to spare criminals when they sowed genuine signs of remorse and reform.