Gamma Ray said:It makes no sense to have luggage on a flight to nowhere. They were going to land right where they came from.
ChrisBaleBatman said:Nothing wrong with that.
Gamma Ray said:It makes no sense to have luggage on a flight to nowhere. They were going to land right where they came from.
Gamma Ray said:It makes no sense to have luggage on a flight to nowhere. They were going to land right where they came from.
qstorm said:Damn good point! Of Course, I don't understand why you would want to launch a space shuttle froma commercial airline in the first place.
The large plane was not a commercial craft. The project was a joint venture between the Air Force, Nasa, and some private companies. The plane was merely going to be used as a launch pad. Nothing was specifically said about it being used for regular flight although I'm sure some entrepenuer would definitely try to kill two birds with one stone.Galactical said:So the plane was supposed to carry passengers to some place they wanted to go like canada or wherever, as well as launch a space shuttle? Something's causing error in my mind. Now ok... it's an aircraft for "average" people to board to go to mexico or wherever, and also a shuttle launching pad sort of deal, killing two birds and all that I suppose. Is that right?
skruloos said:The large plane was not a commercial craft. The project was a joint venture between the Air Force, Nasa, and some private companies. The plane was merely going to be used as a launch pad. Nothing was specifically said about it being used for regular flight although I'm sure some entrepenuer would definitely try to kill two birds with one stone.
No. The commercial vehicle in the movie being tested was supposed to be the shuttle.