Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]537681[/split]
While it hurts me as a DC fan to see these characters reputations destroyed by WB, and make no mistake, that IS what's happening here, it gives me great pleasure to see Marvel snapping their fingers and basically wishing away the DCEU in the box office. Putting those that would tarnish the DC brand in their place. Marvel fights for DC more than WB ever did.
They are not actually destroying, it's just that it will take some years to prepare people for a "proper" Superman and JL. In some years, it will be the batman begins situation, people are gonna be hungry for a good take on the characters after the then far behind debacle.
Yeah, things can change very quickly when you start making top quality films again. The fans all want to love these properties and are gunshy for now but give them a few great films and they'll be back. Removing the stigma with the GA for characters who don't have a history is a bit more difficult though as they don't have the same underlying loyalty.
But theyre not exactly giving it time for people to get that itch back. Were in the midst of a superhero boon and WB arent just going to let that pass them. Theyll keep churning these out until its not worth it. Thats the worry of devaluing their IPs in a short window of time.They are not actually destroying, it's just that it will take some years to prepare people for a "proper" Superman and JL. In some years, it will be the batman begins situation, people are gonna be hungry for a good take on the characters after the then far behind debacle.
But theyre not exactly giving it time for people to get that itch back. Were in the midst of a superhero boon and WB arent just going to let that pass them. Theyll keep churning these out until its not worth it. Thats the worry of devaluing their IPs in a short window of time.
You need a good Superman movie (that likely won't make a lot of money cause audiences are wary), to regain trust, and expect in the long run (the sequel) get the real results (like TDK). As others have said, I doubt WB is willing to commit to that kind of investment, and they'll try to get the same result in the shortest possible time (wich is what they did with JL, they wanted Avengers without building to it, taking shortcuts, etc)But even the Batman Begins comparison needs a TDK, so in the end is it a 2 step process?
Do you need a good Superman movie followed by a stellar Superman movie? Wonder Woman to JL didn't help JL. Maybe WW to WW2 may.
I feel like they are just starting to, or may have already, realized that.You need a good Superman movie (that likely won't make a lot of money cause audiences are wary), to regain trust, and expect in the long run (the sequel) get the real results (like TDK). As others have said, I doubt WB is willing to commit to that kind of investment, and they'll try to get the same result in the shortest possible time (wich is what they did with JL, they wanted Avengers without building to it, taking shortcuts, etc)
I feel like they are just starting to, or may have already, realized that.
That slate that Kevin Tsujihara gave out at SDCC, a while back, was a mistake.
Yeah, and as with Batman Begins, they should be prepared for modest box office at first, and good critical reception paying up in home video and the sequels.
But even the Batman Begins comparison needs a TDK, so in the end is it a 2 step process?
Do you need a good Superman movie followed by a stellar Superman movie? Wonder Woman to JL didn't help JL. Maybe WW to WW2 may.