Karr will not be charged in Jon Bonet Ramsay's death.

[Spider-Bite]

Nor could they prove that he was in Colorado on December 25th, 1996!

Hence, no case!!!

I was saying that your post was not true. You said he was in Georgia at the time. You don't know that. You have no way of knowing that. The overwhelming majority of parents would lie at a time like that, even though most people deny it.

I'm not saying they have proof, but how come this guy gets the charges dropped while the rest of the accused go to prison based on "He said-she said" It's because of the media scrutiny. That's why. If this case wasn't famous, he's be charged, tried, and convicted. We all know it. I admitted they don't have proof, and the appropiate thing is to drop the charges, after rereading up on the facts. I admitted this in a previous post, but it's not because they have no case against him at all. That is absolutely not it.

If I wanted to, I could go for a walk right now untill I see somebody walking down the street, use my cell phone, and say I was just sexually assaulted or grabbed or they flashed me, by somebody, give a description of their clothing, and that person would be picked up in minutes and go to jail. and if I agreed to testify they'd be convicted.

 

[Addendum]

I was saying that your post was not true. You said he was in Georgia at the time. You don't know that. You have no way of knowing that. The overwhelming majority of parents would lie at a time like that, even though most people deny it.

I'm not saying they have proof, but how come this guy gets the charges dropped while the rest of the accused go to prison based on "He said-she said" It's because of the media scrutiny. That's why. If this case wasn't famous, he's be charged, tried, and convicted. We all know it. I admitted they don't have proof, and the appropiate thing is to drop the charges, after rereading up on the facts. I admitted this in a previous post, but it's not because they have no case against him at all. That is absolutely not it.

If I wanted to, I could go for a walk right now untill I see somebody walking down the street, use my cell phone, and say I was just sexually assaulted or grabbed or they flashed me, by somebody, give a description of their clothing, and that person would be picked up in minutes and go to jail. and if I agreed to testify they'd be convicted.

From the District Attorney of Boulder, Colorado...

As contemplated at the time of the initial arrest and subsequent press conference, my office has spent the past week conducting follow-up interviews and forensic testing to establish whether John Mark Karr was present in Boulder on December 25-26, 1996.

The DNA associated with the victim in this case does not match John Mark Karr. The family of Mr. Karr cooperated by providing circumstantial evidence that Mr. Karr spent Christmas with his family in Atlanta, Georgia.

Since it didn't match Karr, and he wasn't in Colorado, he didn't do it. Therefore, no case.

I'll take the DA's word over some dude on an internet message board every damned day

 

[Spider-Bite]

From the District Attorney of Boulder, Colorado...


Since it didn't match Karr, and he wasn't in Colorado, he didn't do it. Therefore, no case.

I'll take the DA's word over some dude on an internet message board every damned day

why do you keep saying he wasn't in colorado? what you should be saying is the parents who are not trustworthy since they themselves were horrible child abusers who belong in prison, vouched for him. His mother tried to burn him alive when he was a child, and your going to trust her not to lie? come on. their statement is irrelevant. even if they got photos or anything, they could easily be from a different time period.

Why would you just assume they are telling the truth. and this dna, are they talking about the DNA on the underwear or her body? cause I think I read it was on her body, but if it was the dna on the underwear than it's irrelevant, because that brand of underwear comes with dna on it when you buy it. it gets there during the packaging process. this was discovered by investiagtors early on in the investigation. so they knew that the DNA on the underwear might not be the attacker's.

 

[Spider-Bite]

seriously Michael Jackson had to go to court. The state spent almost a hundred million on investigators and Johny cochran style attorneys to convict him. Of course he spent 20 mill on lawyers and investigators to get himself aquited, but that family had falsely accused people for money 4 times prior to accusing Michael. But they took him to court for 6 months of his life, and cost him 20 million dollars, when they knew this family who was supposedly kidnapped for 2 weeks was coming and going at their own free will for days at a time. they even had them on camera for crying out loud saying it wasn't true. of course they said that on the tape they were lying but please believe me now, but still. why would he go to trial and a man who confessed and has handwriting that matches the ransom note which is just as unique and reliable as DNA testing be allowed to go scott free? this guy was married toa 13 year old girl in the U.S. and any pedophile psychologist could be called to the stand right there, and establish a pattern of behavior. there is no way a jury would say not guilty.

 

[Addendum]

why do you keep saying he wasn't in colorado? what you should be saying is the parents who are not trustworthy since they themselves were horrible child abusers who belong in prison, vouched for him. His mother tried to burn him alive when he was a child, and your going to trust her not to lie? come on. their statement is irrelevant. even if they got photos or anything, they could easily be from a different time period.

Write a letter to the DA of Boulder, Colorado. She's the one who believes it.

Why would you just assume they are telling the truth. and this dna, are they talking about the DNA on the underwear or her body? cause I think I read it was on her body, but if it was the dna on the underwear than it's irrelevant, because that brand of underwear comes with dna on it when you buy it. it gets there during the packaging process. this was discovered by investiagtors early on in the investigation. so they knew that the DNA on the underwear might not be the attacker's.

Again, write a letter to the DA of Boulder, Colorado.

Just make sure to include your real name, not O'Reilly Junior

 

[Spider-Bite]

I hate O'Reilly. I'm just saying that it was way too early for them to drop this. And I'm sure the D.A. has enough letters to shred, I ain't giving her anymore.

 

[Addendum]

I hate O'Reilly. I'm just saying that it was way too early for them to drop this. And I'm sure the D.A. has enough letters to shred, I ain't giving her anymore.

What are your credentials, and why should I or anyone else take your opinion over that of the District Attorney of Boulder, Colorado?

 

[War Lord]

I hate O'Reilly. I'm just saying that it was way too early for them to drop this. And I'm sure the D.A. has enough letters to shred, I ain't giving her anymore.

They wouldn't have dropped it if there was sufficient evidence to get him on something. Quite likely, since he's up for child porn charges, if he's convicted in California, he's going away for a long time anyway.

 

[Arkady Rossovich]

The fool was just someone who had a pitiful facination with Jon Bonet.Just arrest the person for something else,and let the girl`s soul rest in peace.