The Dark Knight Lachy Hulme finally speaks up

RedIsNotBlue

Agree to disagree
Joined
Aug 21, 2004
Messages
21,982
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Please forgive me if this has been posted but I haven't seen it.

Alright dude, you know I’ve got to ask you about this -- What’s the deal with The Joker and how in the hell did you get in the mix for the part?

LH: You guys, that’s how. Your website, man. The first I heard of it, someone rang me to say that they’d heard on the radio that I actually had the part, and this was before BATMAN BEGINS had even come out, so this was early 2005. And on the radio, they were apparently quoting from your site, so there you have it. Of course, I had to explain to my family that I wasn’t playing the part, but from that moment on, the media have been chasing me around asking for a quote, which I couldn’t give. But every other weekend down here, there would be some blurb or column in the papers talking about how I was the “front-runner” or some ****. Thank God Heath got the gig, ‘cause now the press can all **** off. But the Internet speculation has been extraordinary. Unbelievable!

Now I never reported it, but there was talk that you met with Chris Nolan. True?

LH Never. Although, according to the Internet, not only have I met him, we’re now part owners in a racehorse together.


(laughs) What about Charles Roven?

LH: I’ve met Chuck, but not about Batman. I mean, we did talk about Batman, and certainly talked about all of the rumors about me playing The Joker, but nothing more than that. We talked more about some other projects he’s doing. But interestingly, about 10 minutes after I walked out of my meeting with Chuck, it was all over the Internet that I’d been there. News travels fast in Hollywood, mate. And funnily enough, news travels fast everywhere, because the only time I’ve ever talked about Batman was on radio in Melbourne, on Tony Martin’s show, and I made a few wisecracks about the Batman gig, and suddenly it’s all over the world that I’m in these so-called “secret talks” about playing The Joker. If memory serves, that was your site that picked all of that up. You guys are faster than CNN.

Did you screentest?

LH: No. As far as I know, no one did. No one was asked. Christopher Nolan strikes me as the kind of guy that doesn’t have to test actors anymore, certainly not for roles like The Joker. He knows who he wants, and he gets them.

We know that Heath Ledger is The Joker, but how would you have played him?

LH: However the director wants me to play it, simple as that. (laughs) That’s my job. Obviously you come to work with your own ideas, with your own prep and your research done, and you try to impose some sort of personal vision onto the role you’re playing, whether that be through the costume or the accent or the ticking clock inside whomever you’re playing, or whatever. But even with a role like The Joker, which is open to so much interpretation, you ultimately have to acquiesce to the director, otherwise get out of the way. Acting is not like painting. You don’t get to sit in a corner and create your own special thing. You’re part of a team. You’re servicing a vision, particularly in feature films. That’s what you get paid for.

Is it true that you are a big Batman fan -- like me for instance?


LH: Not as such. And I don’t mean any disrespect to you guys, who all supported me, but I’m not a huge comic book fan, by any stretch. By the way, I’m reliably informed that you guys are nicknamed by the powers that be at Warner Bros. as the “Batman Fundamentalists,” or the “DC Fundamentalists.” (laughs) You guys wield an extraordinary amount of power, believe me. I think I’m living proof of that. We wouldn’t be chatting unless you guys had flexed your muscles.

I gotcha. But it was rumored that you were a huge Bat-fan. I think that the BOF readers loved that about you by the way.

LH: Yeah, that started because of the mucking around on Tony Martin’s show. I think I said I would be claiming Batman comics on my tax return if I got the role, but that was just a stupid attempt at witty repartee on my part. I do like the character. I think he’s the best of all the comic book heroes, and I certainly read some of the comics when I was a kid, so being thought of as a Batman fan is nice company to be in.

OK, with that said, what did you think about BATMAN BEGINS?


LH: Loved it. Brilliant. Different from Richard Donner’s SUPERMAN, but on par with it in terms of an origin story. Great cast, great script, just a great movie. A really well crafted movie. Obviously, with all the Internet speculation about me playing The Joker, I certainly delved very heavily into the Batman world, as my interest was piqued, and so I watched that movie many, many times, on DVD. I also bought a lot of comics, the anthology ones, like The Greatest Batman Stories Ever Told and so on. And I’d read Dark Knight Returns years ago, so I went back to that, and Year One. I’m starting to sound like a fan-boy now, aren’t I?

Dude, come on! You‘re NOT a Batman fan -- riiiiiight.


LH: (laughs) But it was more just out of interest as an actor. Actually, going back to what you asked before, about how I might have approached the role of The Joker, I suppose the obvious thing would be to just go back to the original version of the character. That interests me. Everyone raves about what Alan Moore did with The Killing Joke, but ultimately, that version of the character demands you to feel sympathy for the guy, and I don’t believe we should feel anything but fear and disgust for him. For me, the most interesting version is what Bob Kane and Bill Finger did with the first incarnation of the character, which was basically a prototype for the modern-day serial killer, something like what The Zodiac Killer in San Francisco in the 60s and 70s was, a killer who announces his crimes and then commits them in a way that makes no sense, and then just disappears back into the shadows. An unstoppable force, a very dark, scary force. I found that very compelling, that first ever Joker story. At the end of the day, there should be nothing sympathetic about a character like The Joker, and certainly nothing funny about him. I know everybody hearing this or, sorry, reading this will hate me for saying that, but that would be my jumping-off point as an actor. Until the director told me to shut up and do it his way. (laughs) And by the way, I’m not trying to insult The Killing Joke or Alan Moore or anything like that. In fact, I can see why his take on The Joker has inspired such a passionate following, because it’s, y’know, such an intelligent and literate take on the character for the modern reader. But you can’t go past the Bob Kane/Bill Finger version, in my opinion. They nailed him right from the start. And Jerry Robinson, too. Did I mention him?

On my site, the fans have debated the good and bad of the “Burton/Schumacher” Bat-films for years. What did you think of them?

LH: Not much. I mean, there are some cool moments in all of them, with the exception, of course, of Batman & Robin. Good God, what a piece of **** film. You need subtitles to understand what the hell Schwarzenegger is saying! Terrible. Just ****ing terrible. And a pity, too. They never made a truly satisfying Batman movie until Nolan came along. I mean, the casting of Christian Bale was just perfect. He also would have made a great James Bond, but carrying the world’s two biggest movie franchises might be too big a task, even for him! (laughs)

Back to The Joker one more time. Man, you had a lot of support from Bat-fans -- including me to be honest. Do you have anything to say to all those guys that had your back?

LH: Absolutely, yes. I just want to say thanks for all the support. A very heartfelt thanks. I mean, these people don’t know me beyond, I’m guessing, things like MATRIX, but they obviously saw in me something that they felt could translate into playing that villain on the big screen, which is just a huge, huge compliment. It was very humbling. Surreal, too! (laughs) Surreal, but very humbling. And thanks to you, too, mate, for all the nice things that you’ve written about me. I was certainly made aware of them, from various friends, and my managers and so forth. Just a great feeling to have all of that support out there. So, yeah, thank you. Thanks.

http://www.batman-on-film.com/interview_lachyhulme2_jett.html
 
He seems like a great person but I'm pretty happy that he didn't get it. I think that he had the looks but only the looks. HL wasn't my first choice but the more that I think about it the more he fits the role IMO.
 
nice find dude :up:

LH: (laughs) But it was more just out of interest as an actor. Actually, going back to what you asked before, about how I might have approached the role of The Joker, I suppose the obvious thing would be to just go back to the original version of the character. That interests me. Everyone raves about what Alan Moore did with The Killing Joke, but ultimately, that version of the character demands you to feel sympathy for the guy, and I don’t believe we should feel anything but fear and disgust for him. For me, the most interesting version is what Bob Kane and Bill Finger did with the first incarnation of the character, which was basically a prototype for the modern-day serial killer, something like what The Zodiac Killer in San Francisco in the 60s and 70s was, a killer who announces his crimes and then commits them in a way that makes no sense, and then just disappears back into the shadows. An unstoppable force, a very dark, scary force. I found that very compelling, that first ever Joker story. At the end of the day, there should be nothing sympathetic about a character like The Joker, and certainly nothing funny about him. I know everybody hearing this or, sorry, reading this will hate me for saying that, but that would be my jumping-off point as an actor. Until the director told me to shut up and do it his way. (laughs) And by the way, I’m not trying to insult The Killing Joke or Alan Moore or anything like that. In fact, I can see why his take on The Joker has inspired such a passionate following, because it’s, y’know, such an intelligent and literate take on the character for the modern reader. But you can’t go past the Bob Kane/Bill Finger version, in my opinion. They nailed him right from the start. And Jerry Robinson, too. Did I mention him?

this is also my original take on The Joker, and ultimately this is what i'm hoping to see in TDK. TKJ's backstory on The Joker was ok but its a double edged sword: it humanizes him indeed-- keeps him from being just a cardboard cut out villain, but it also takes away his mystery and deadens his edge a bit.
 
Damn, that was a great interview. Hulme seems like a great guy and after reading that, it almost makes me wish he got the part because I respect any actor who takes the time to really delve into the source material when interested in a particular character. He may have said he's not a huge comic book fan, but he obviously read up on the comics enough to distinguish the different versions of the Joker that have surfaced over the years, and although I prefer the Joker to be a bit more sympathetic, I'm also totally cool with someone portraying him as completely unredeemable, because when you think about it, the Joker is pure evil and will kill ANYONE for ANY reason. Regardless of his past and what made him the way he is, there are no valid excuses for the things that he does and if he was portrayed that way, it wouldn't be a bad thing.
 
SentinelMind said:
He never met Nolan and never screentested. Some "frontrunner".

He also said probably nobody else did either. That if Nolan has someone in mind he just goes with it.
 
*sigh* That's my Hulme, beeyitches . . . :(
 
RedIsNotBlue said:
He also said probably nobody else did either. That if Nolan has someone in mind he just goes with it.

And how would he know that, pray tell, if he's never met Nolan? That comment actually makes me a little worried. As much as I have faith in Nolan, him not screen testing raises some yellow flags.
 
SentinelMind said:
And how would he know that, pray tell, if he's never met Nolan? That comment actually makes me a little worried. As much as I have faith in Nolan, him not screen testing raises some yellow flags.

Well if you read the whole thing he and Charles Roven have had conversations.
 
Great interview. He seems to be a Batman fan-boy but not admitting to it. :oldrazz:

However the pic of him on BOF near the bottom has him looking a little fat and sleepy. He looks like Ringo Starr in it.
 
Darknightnomis said:
Great interview. He seems to be a Batman fan-boy but not admitting to it. :oldrazz:

However the pic of him on BOF near the bottom has him looking a little fat and sleepy. He looks like Ringo Starr in it.

I believe that pic is him in character for the movie Boytown.
 
Hulme sounds like a honest and just kind guy.

But for me, Ledger is #1.
 
You know, he sounds like he knew what he was doing and wouldn't have been bad at all.
 
Ronny Shade said:
You know, he sounds like he knew what he was doing and wouldn't have been bad at all.

Yep, but after that new interview with Ledger, I was amazed how closer he is to this character.
 
Yeah Ledger's a great choice, for sure, but Hulme doesn't seem as bad here as all the Bettanists made him out to be in their minds.

Speaking of Bettanists, where's McFlytrap been?
 
Ronny Shade said:
Yeah Ledger's a great choice, for sure, but Hulme doesn't seem as bad here as all the Bettanists made him out to be in their minds.

Speaking of Bettanists, where's McFlytrap been?

Well, as for me, first time I was for Bettany, then I went to Hulme as a better choice and 2 weeks before LR confirmed Ledger I had been for nobody.
 
I'm very confident that Ledger's gonna be great, but you know I think Hulme really would've made an awesome Joker as well.
 
This interview makes Hulme seem like a normal, decent, fun guy.

Bettany's interviews make him seem more like Zaphod Beeblebrox. I know which I prefer.
 
Im still lukewarm on Ledger but I'll wait until I see the finished product.
It also shows all the outbreak internet rumors are out of control.
 
StorminNorman said:
This interview makes Hulme seem like a normal, decent, fun guy.

Bettany's interviews make him seem more like Zaphod Beeblebrox. I know which I prefer.




A three arm, two-head JoKer would've been KEWL. :woot: :oldrazz:
 
Darknightnomis said:



A three arm, two-head JoKer would've been KEWL. :woot: :oldrazz:

As would a Three arm, one working head Joker - as that picture shows :)
 
Darknightnomis said:



A three arm, two-head JoKer would've been KEWL. :woot: :oldrazz:

As would a Three arm, one working head Joker - as that picture shows :)
 
Hasn't someone already made this thread? - just joking.

I mentioned this before on the Joker thread but thought I'd add it here:

ME said:
I found this interesting about the interview:

What do you have coming up next Lachy?

LH: A couple of things. I’ve been offered the lead in a romantic comedy, can you believe it? (laughs) A little different from my usual fare, but it’s a sweet project, so that should be fun. And I’m just starting to do some homework for another thing, a darker thing, which if I told you about, they’d kill me. I mean, I’m not trying to sound too mysterious about it, but y’know, always be mindful to those who write the paychecks.

Usually if it's an Australian film actors try and promote it as soon as they can, which make me think it could be a big Inernational film as it seem to be a bit hush, hush.
 
The interview sounds like Jett plugged Hulme's name for the role, and that was how the buzz started. Hulme obviously wasn't up for it, and couldn't care less that he didn't get the part.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"