Whilst I don't nessessarily agree with him, I don't think Begins and Dark Knight are any better then Batman '89. They're better for different reasons, but I do feel Burton did some things better then Nolan, and Nolan did some other things better then Burton, but over all I believe they're pretty much equal. What bothers me is how some fan boys seem to believe Burtons vision was somehow inaccurate to Batman comics. That's very far from the truth. They just stem from different versions of the character. I enjoy both. Whilst I don't necessarily agree with him, I don't think Begins and Dark Knight are any better then Batman '89. They're better for different reasons, but I do feel Burton did some things better then Nolan, and Nolan did some other things better then Burton, but over all I believe they're pretty much equal. What bothers me is how some fan boys seem to believe Burtons vision was somehow inaccurate to Batman comics. That's very far from the truth. They just stem from different versions of the character. I enjoy both. So I find it admirable that a pseudo-celebrity stands up for Burtons vision, points out it’s numerous accuracies to counteract the ignorant fan boy arguments, and plays fair when it comes to criticizing the Batman films.