jaymes_e06
Avenger
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2008
- Messages
- 20,644
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
He bought it from the gun store... 

He bought it from the gun store...![]()
The footage of how he was lead to the police car, cop walking in front of him, handcuffed in the front, for comfort? He did just kill a man. Or is that standard operating procedure?
Really, what logical sense does it make that handguns are easily accessible? You don't hunt fowl or fauna with a pistol do you?
When you go to a theater turn your fricken cell phone off, it's rude to other people who want to enjoy the movie. Maybe I am overstating he should have been shot, but fact still stands the guy shouldn't have been texting
That last part scares me. This murderous piece of sh** better not get any special treatment just because he used to be a cop.
I am usually against senseless uses of guns but the guy who was texting deserved it
'murrica!
Yeah I heard that on the news and of course my blood boiled. Why did he need a gun to go see a movie in the first place? I don't think people should be allowed to carry weapons into movie theaters but that's just me.He's already doing that, claiming he "feared for his life" even though no one else in the theater seems to be corrobrating that side of the incident.
Yeah I heard that on the news and of course my blood boiled. Why did he need a gun to go see a movie in the first place? I don't think people should be allowed to carry weapons into movie theaters but that's just me.
Yep. That's the problem with carrying guns everywhere you go. You get angry, shoot first and ask questions later.A lot of people with concealed carry permits take their guns everywhere they can and are open about enjoying it. There are often boastful fantasies that gun owners would be able to stop crimes in progress with their weapons, but tragic scenarios like this are a far more likely outcome. When tempers get frayed and there is a gun handy things escalate much quicker than when there are no weapons in the equation.
God I hate this. I was watching a Canadian livestream the other day making jokes about it like this and talking about how much they hated America and such. I'm not patriotic, but I don't want to see the country go down the toilet any more than it has though. Apparently we're either fat (which I am, so score one for stereotypes I guess), or stupid. Why? Cause 'Murrica! Just annoying to me, and all this gun violence the media keeps playing up lately certainly isn't helping the cause.
When Curtis Reeves Jr. killed a texting moviegoer and wounded a bystander at a theater outside Tampa yesterday with a .380 pistol, it sounded like a clear case of rage. But the 71-year-old retired cop may have been in fear for his life—and he may be able to take advantage of Florida's gun-friendly self-defense law.
Reeves' initial statement certainly indicates he'll claim self-defense, according to an analysis by the Tampa Bay Times' Jessica Vander Velde:
Reeves told Pasco Sheriff's deputies Monday that Oulson stood up and struck him in the face with an unknown object when they were arguing inside a Wesley Chapel movie theater during previews. Reeves said he was "in fear of being attacked," according to an arrest affidavit.But the county police aren't buying it, in part because the "unknown object" was a bag of movie popcorn:
Reeves wanted Oulson to stop texting. He walked out and complained to theater management. When Reeves returned to the 1:20 p.m. showing of Lone Survivor, "words were exchanged" and Oulson threw a bag of popcorn at Reeves, an arrest affidavit states.Under Florida's stand your ground statute—an expansive cover-all advanced by the state's top NRA lobbyist in 2005—anyone can shoot to kill, assuming they reasonably feared for their physical well-being. And the definition of "reasonably" is quite elastic, law professor Charles Rose told Vander Velde:
Witnesses say the pair did not throw punches. Then Reeves pulled a gun and shot Oulson, who was pronounced dead at the hospital.
Many factors could come into play, he said.Looking into the mind of an elderly man who comes armed to a matinee showing of "Lone Survivor" shouldn't take long, really. But then again, this is Florida, where George Zimmerman was found not guilty, and where lawmakers are currently considering adding warning shots and the brandishing of weapons to the list of acts that could be protected under the stand your ground law. Until it all shakes out, residents are probably best served by a Redbox. Or kevlar.
For one, when Oulson threw popcorn, that was technically assault under state law. Was it reasonable to respond with deadly force simply because of the popcorn? No, Rose said.
However, if Reeves considered the popcorn throwing to be one step in an escalating response from Oulson — and if the 71-year-old man feared that Oulson would come over the movie theater seats and physically attack him next — and if Reeves felt he wouldn't be able to handle such an attack from a younger man, then jurors might consider deadly force reasonable, the attorney said.
"Here's the problem: We're trying to look into the mind of the defendant and posit what the thought was happening," Rose said.