Admit it, you have all seen this coming. 
As Man of Steel' was approaching, we all wondered if the film is going to be better than 'The Dark Knight' or 'The Avengers'. But as a comparison with TDK is hard, because in the film occur no super beings, The Avengers is all that's left! And not just because these two adaptations are from two competing comic book publishers.
And there are already comparisons, debates and discussions about these two blockbusters in topics such as the death of innocent people or not, collateral damage and of course about breaking the 'one rule'. While some people are complaining about these Elements we saw in MOS, other ones indeed do like it and call a better 'realism' in facing an Alien Invasion.
But what do YOU think? Do you find that TA is too jokey in comparison to MOS? Are the destruction scenes are exaggerated in MOS? Which of the two has the 'more realistic touch'?
WHICH ONE IS BETTER?
Let's hear it? Give pros and cons of BOTH movies. Let's get started!
As Man of Steel' was approaching, we all wondered if the film is going to be better than 'The Dark Knight' or 'The Avengers'. But as a comparison with TDK is hard, because in the film occur no super beings, The Avengers is all that's left! And not just because these two adaptations are from two competing comic book publishers.
And there are already comparisons, debates and discussions about these two blockbusters in topics such as the death of innocent people or not, collateral damage and of course about breaking the 'one rule'. While some people are complaining about these Elements we saw in MOS, other ones indeed do like it and call a better 'realism' in facing an Alien Invasion.
But what do YOU think? Do you find that TA is too jokey in comparison to MOS? Are the destruction scenes are exaggerated in MOS? Which of the two has the 'more realistic touch'?
WHICH ONE IS BETTER?
Let's hear it? Give pros and cons of BOTH movies. Let's get started!
