Marc Forster to Direct World War Z

Rate the Movie

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why would Brad Pitt be threatened by the guy from Party of Five and Lost?

Fox had more of a role in the original third act, Pitt's plane crashes in Russia and he ends up going into forced recruitment to fight zombies, which apparently goes on for some time. While Pitt's character was doing that, his wife ends up hooking up with Fox's character in order to survive in the refugee camp.
 

That's what I thought. So they pretty much only used CGI when they had to for the crowd swarming scenes. It's what I Am Legend should have done, but even they used CGI when all the monster was doing was just standing there.
 
This movie was pretty awesome. Everyone in my theater was kind of on edge watching it hehe. & when it was over, there was this sort of quiet round of applause...I think they were all freaked over the concept of it. :funny:

It was great though. I totally enjoyed it.
 
That one zombified black doctor in the WHO lab....man, that was the one that kept getting laughs because of the faces she was making.

That one got laughs at my show, as did [BLACKOUT]the one who Pitt lets into the lab with him to see if the vaccine works. They kept laughing at his clicking teeth.[/BLACKOUT]

Also, Brad Pitt [BLACKOUT]appearing to stop and do a Pepsi commercial before making his way back out of the lab got the biggest laugh in the movie. [/BLACKOUT]
 
Since they didn't show any labels, I thought the cola bit was fine.
 
the movie was a blast. made me a giddy moviegoer which rarely tends to happen these days. surprised how the audience was so much into it. they were constantly gasping and screaming, i felt like i was in the audience trailer for paranormal activity. :woot:

i was also surprised how much i liked the movie given that it underwent an extensive amount of reshoots (which isn't a certainty, but tends to be a sign that a movie will suck). I'm also glad that they went the new ending. the original ending is a little too wtf for me.
 
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/World-War-Z-Sequel-Plans-Begin-Again-38189.html

"From the very beginning everyone behind World War Z has been frank about hoping for a sequel-- though in the cautious, "we'll have to wait and see how it does" way that pretty much everyone is before their movie opens (Man of Steel being the rare recent exception). In early 2012 word broke that director Marc Forster was imagining the film as the beginning of a trilogy, but that was before the movie's ending was completely changed, leading to an avalanche of bad press and the sense that Paramount was just aiming to get the film out there, try not to totally lose their shirts on it, and forget all about it.

And then the power of Brad Pitt showed up to surprise us all. World War Z made an estimated $111.8 million worldwide this weekend, a remarkably strong debut for a non-sequel, decidedly non-family movie not based on a familiar property (Max Brooks's novel is great, but not exactly household name). Confident all over again, Paramount has told THR that they will now be actively developing a sequel, though the original plans for a trilogy seem to have at least been sharply altered back when the ending was changed. The current ending of the movie certainly leaves plenty of room for a potential sequel, and given how little World War Z used from Brooks's novel, they could mine entire scenes and story lines from there alone.

You might think that Pitt would be less than eager to return to a film that required him to do unbelievable amounts of publicity, but as a producer of the film he was a champion for it the entire time, and it's a huge hit for his Plan B Entertainment in addition to Paramount. It's also, unbelievably, the biggest opening of Pitt's career. Sure he's earned critical acclaim and significant box office success with recent prestige picks like Moneyball, Inglourious Basterds and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, but the ability to make sure a blockbuster opens big is a major element of being an A-list star, and it's something Pitt has done far less often than Tom Cruise, Will Smith, or even Angelina Jolie. Pitt and Jolie's shared best-ever opening was Mr. And Mrs. Smith, until Jolie bested it with Wanted in 2008.

World War Z will doubtlessly be one of the summer's most unlikely success stories, and Paramount has to feel confident going into a sequel because, hey, now they know they've at least come up with one version of the story that can work. If you saw World War Z this weekend-- and based on the box office numbers, a lot of you did-- let us know if the movie had you interested in a sequel. If you've got ideas for that sequel too, by all means, share them in the comments."
 
I enjoyed the movie and would gladly see a sequel especially given the fact that they didn't use much of the book, so there's still a lot of chances to actually use the source material properly. What do you think the sequel should be about?

The only thing I really didn't like about the movie was
the fact that the ending was very montage-y and seems to imply there's a full on cure for the zombie condition. I know it's more fitting here since the story is about a guy trying to find it but I've always liked it better when the zombie condition doesn't have a cure. I know it's more of a camo but I like the finality of zombies better
 
If you think about it...a sequel would be more entertaining, would be action packed and all about retaking the world back..cant see how they can screw that up...
 
I saw this last week and thought it was great, some amazing sequences, especially in Israel which was the highlight along with the plane scene. Considering the rating they actually got away with a lot of violence which was great.

The only part I didnt like was in the Welsh facility at the end, I know the movie had to slow down at some point, but after the rush of all the previous scene's this felt a little jarring to be at the end, I still enjoyed it a lot though, great stuff and some good jump scares and tension building scenes. Count me on board for a sequel if it happens, 8/10.
 
I agree with that assessment. I enjoyed the film overall.
 
Such a bloodless movie it was hard to suspend disbelief. IMHO it was like the big budget version of 28 Days Later with less blood and gore.

I dunno, a part of me thinks this was some sort of chemical weapon. If this is a virus, it came off as designed to me. It's not feasible to me why a virus that "kills" you makes you faster and gives you almost superhuman strength.

Cinematography in the action sequences was terrible. Couldn't see anything.

I will say I glad they changed the ending. The best sequence was probably the WHO sequence. Forster IMHO is a bad "action" director.
 
Yeah, they could have at least gone with black blood for the zombies, that would have kept it in the PG-13 area (the MPAA doesn't like red blood).

I was hoping he would have pulled a Faverau/Nolan after QoS, and learned to shoot action like they did for Iron Man 2 and Inception. Maybe the sequel, though given the **** he went through, I don't if he'd want to come back.

Hopefully they've learned to lock down the script before shooting such a large scale movie.
 
Saw this last week, pretty good & entertaining. It was a good decision not to try to top the Israel action at the end.

7.5/10
 
Someone had to pay for the reshoot scenes at the end. Pepsi probably gave them $15-$25 million for that scene
 
Someone had to pay for the reshoot scenes at the end. Pepsi probably gave them $15-$25 million for that scene

"And let me enjoy this refreshing Pepsi before I go out and stop this zombie apocalypse." I was waiting for him to wink at the camera.

It reminded me of this:

[YT]8lgLYGBbDNs[/YT]
 
Has the movie really done that well? It's only opened with $66 million on like a $200 million budget? What if it drops like a rock this weekend?
 
worldwide gross will be nice for WWZ. I also think there is nothing impressive this weekend. White House Down and The Heat
 
Has the movie really done that well? It's only opened with $66 million on like a $200 million budget? What if it drops like a rock this weekend?

66 M opening for an original film is extremely good, yes.

But you're right, it could drop like a rock this weekend (65%-80%) and all those sequel plans might be thrown out the window.

But it did have a very successful opening.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"