• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Marvel Studios Retrospective Reviews

Yeah Incredible Hulk, IM2 and DW all tend to get a raw deal but that's only when Fox, Sony and WB supporters are desperate for a legit argument. But regardless of what anyone says, IH is one of my favorite CBM's. Thor2 and IM2 weren't perfect but I'm resistant to the idea that either of them are par with SM3, Ghost Rider, GL, Origins or Elektra. Again people cheat while defending lesser studios by low balling the quality of these films.
You're exactly right. Every time I see a poster here downplaying Marvel's overall quality it is usually coupled with an argument in support of another studio. Not always, everyone is entitled to their opinions and Marvel is not everyone's cup of tea, but that happens quite frequently.
IM3 on the other hand is one MCU film I just can't defend. Simply put I hated it. 4 out 10 at best. Even w/o the Mandarin screw up the whole Killian angle was so reminiscent to Syndrome that Marvel should've just borrowed him from Pixar and it would've been a vast improvement on an otherwise lazy "Micheal Bay esk" story. (Admit it, the Ironman drones at the end folded easier than aluminum foil at the end)

But since we're talking 1 rotten egg out of 11. The MCU's overall score is a B+ for me which no other studio making MCU's comes close to.
Wow, I didn't know you felt that way. I very much loved Iron Man 3.
But either way you're right, one out of ten/eleven is still an impressive track record that no other studio has yet to match. No one has even come close, really.
Very much so. Head and shoulders above the second film (what really happened in that movie after Monaco, anyway?), and had the best character arc for the protagonist in the series thus far.

I agree, and I enjoyed the second film. It was a clear step down from the first one but that is still a pretty high bar.
 
Another great review! I've always been an avid defender of Iron Man 3 and the Mandarin twist, so it's good to hear others sharing my opinion.
 
THOR: THE DARK WORLD

It seems like every time I watch THOR: THE DARK WORLD, I enjoy it a little less. First time I saw it, it was my favourite superhero movie of 2013, and my praise was bordering on gushing. On second viewing, my praise was more modest and flaws were more visible, but I still enjoyed it a good deal and placed it above the first THOR. By third viewing, however, I'm not so sure about that conclusion. While THOR improved for me on my recent rewatch, watching THE DARK WORLD this time, the flaws were even more grating. I'd still say I basically liked the film, but there's enough dragging it down for this to stand out as one of Marvel Studios' weakest offerings.

Now, I'm a defender of the Marvel brand of humour. Some people who like their superhero narratives more dramatic have objected to Marvel Studios' traditionally lighter touch, but I have for the most part found it to be a real benefit to the series. But THOR: THE DARK WORLD pushes it too far. Or rather, it takes the comedy in a different direction, replacing the wry wit and charm with really broad, dumb silliness. I found Darcy annoying enough in the first film, but here she's even more of a pain, her every line some spittle of stupidity that only serves to undercut any drama generated by the story. And then on top of that, Darcy gets her own equally daft intern. And Selvig also becomes a broad bit of comic relief. And there are comedy set-pieces shoehorned in at every turn.

It of course doesn't help much either that the main plot that comedy is forced into isn't really all that gripping in its own right. Malekith, currently an utterly magnetic antagonist in the comics, here stands as one of the MCU's blandest villains, with us sadly getting "sleepwalk for the Hollywood paycheck" Christopher Eccleston rather than "gifted, charismatic" Christopher Eccleston like we tend to get in his TV roles. Even the opening sequence narrated by Odin explaining the Dark Elves and their hazily-defined threat to the Nine Realms feels like a lazy retread of the similar opening setting up the war with the Frost Giants in the first film. Beyond this, as much as I like Natalie Portman, the Thor/Jane Foster romance just isn't all that engaging to watch, acting as the kind of cloyingly gooey sentiment that the Pepper/Tony relationship in the IRON MAN films was a refreshing break from. Though I will say that I did enjoy Jane being taken out into Asgard and brushing against the characters on that side of Thor's supporting cast.

So, even more heavily than the first film, THE DARK WORLD leans on the strength of Tom Hiddleston's Loki as a character. And in this regard, the film is very successful. I'd go so far as to argue that the film works best as a sequel for Loki and a continuation of his development post-AVENGERS. While Thor does get some stuff to do about growing into the role of a future king, he feels largely stationary, his evolution as a character largely completed in the previous film. But Loki still feels vital, capable of change, and here gets a redemptive arc of sorts that, even with his relatively limited screentime, acts as the backbone of the film. Hiddleston and Chris Hemsworth have a fantastic chemistry, where even against the epic fantasy backdrop convincingly portray the very relatable dynamic of two siblings whose relationship is irrevocably strained by grudges and past slights, but who still can't help but have some semblance of love for one another. I also particularly liked the dynamic between Loki and Rene Russo's Frigga, a mother-son dynamic that allows us to see a more human side to the popular villain.

But Loki aside, THOR: THE DARK WORLD serves to underline that this franchise has weaker component parts than the IRON MAN or CAPTAIN AMERICA franchises. And that pains me to admit, as someone who for years now has ranked the Thor comics among his favourites produced by Marvel. But at this stage, two films in, I'd say THOR is the one Marvel Studios property that has yet to produce a great film, unless you count THE INCREDIBLE HULK which didn't manage to produce a franchise. Hopefully the upcoming RAGNAROK can buck this trend and give us a truly satisfying finale to the trilogy. However, even as a deeply flawed film, THOR: THE DARK WORLD does enjoy its share of strong scenes and character moments.

6/10
 
Aw,hoped for a llittle more positive review for TDW. Oh well,I actually had the opppsite reaction to yours. I was a little disappoonted after the first view and appreciated it much more once I got the BluRay.
 
Last edited:
I had the same reaction on re-watches to you KS with TDW, I liked it on first viewing but then it just got worse with every viewing since, I actually think its the weakest MCU movie which is disappointing as I loved the first Thor movie.
 
Aw,hoped for a llittle more positive review for TDW. Oh well,I actually had the opppsite reaction to yours. I was a little disappoonted after the first view and appreciated it much more once I got the BluRay.

Sorry, FA. I had actually planned on writing a better review than the one I did before actually rewatching the film this time, but I had to be honest based on my reaction to the film.

I had the same reaction on re-watches to you KS with TDW, I liked it on first viewing but then it just got worse with every viewing since, I actually think its the weakest MCU movie which is disappointing as I loved the first Thor movie.

I don't know if I'd say it's the weakest MCU film yet. I'd probably still put IRON MAN 2 in that position. But yeah, it's certainly among the weaker Marvel Studios projects. It's not a bad film as such, it still has enough good elements to ultimately be an enjoyable film. But it's easily the weakest film of Phase 2.
 
Figured I'd catch up again with my two cents on the ones you recently reviewed.

The Avengers
What else needs to be said about this one that hasn't already been said? This is one of the crowning achievements for not only Marvel Studios, but for superhero films in general. The Avengers was a huge gamble that more than paid off. It proved that the shared universe made for a better film. The fact that we already were introduced to all the major players in the film (even though one was played by a new actor) made it that much more enjoyable. Seeing them all on screen together for the first time coupled with Joss Whedon's brilliant screenplay was a perfect marriage. Everything was firing on all cylinders and everything clicked. It's hard to pinpoint a standout performance because everyone was great in it. It catapaulted us into a bigger universe and it's just the tip of the iceberg to what Marvel has up its sleeves. This is still my favorite MCU film, but its sequel looks promising enough to knock it off that perch.

Iron Man 3
Phase 2 of the Marvel Cinematic Universe didn't start off as strong as Phase 1. Instead of AC/DC, we get that crappy 90's song "I'm Blue (Da Ba Dee)". Luckily, Phase 2 picked up a hell of a lot of steam that it might even end up better than Phase 1, but I still thought Iron Man 3 could have been so much better. It has its moments and Robert Downey Jr. gives a great performance as usual, but the Mandarin twist is so jarring that it just took me right out of the movie. I loved the chilling performance from Ben Kingsley at the beginning of the movie, but once Trevor shows up it immediately ruins the enjoyment every viewing afterwards. Having said that, I did think that Guy Pearce as Killian was the best villain the Iron Man movies have had so far, even though there's not much to compare him to. The Iron Legion showing up was a nice touch, but then it was short-lived when Tony inexplicably self-destructed them all to appease Pepper. Speaking of which, I hated what was done with her in regards to Extremis powers. Surprisingly, unlike most, the kid didn't bother me because my favorite part of the film might be Tony driving off and ditching him. It's funny...for all the negative things I have to say about it, I still find it more enjoyable than The Incredible Hulk, which makes it the second least favorite MCU film for me, but still not bad. Just disappointing.

Thor: The Dark World
Now here might be the most reviled MCU film so far. I don't think it's as bad as everyone says. It didn't disappoint me like Iron Man 3. I did like it more the first time I saw it, but upon repeat viewings I can see more and more of its flaws. The worst parts of this movie are the Earth scenes with Darcy, even though those didn't bother me as much as they do other people. What did bother me was the boring villain that could have been so much more fleshed out if the movie had been longer. The credits roll on this one at about the 1:45 mark. A longer running time would have definitely improved this one, I think. Characters like Sif and the Warriors Three could have been given more screen time. But there are a few positives. Chris Hemsworth really sells the character in this one. Thor is much more mature in this and you really get the sense that he could be king of Asgard. But the real showstealer in this one is Loki, of course. Tom Hiddleston is the reason why Thor: The Dark World isn't my least favorite MCU film. He's also the reason why this was, believe it or not, my favorite comic book film of 2013. It was kind of a weak year for superhero films.


Keep up the great reviews, Keyser! Looking forward to your reviews for Winter Soldier and Guardians!
 
Dang it Keyser! When is your review for Guardians of the Galaxy coming out? It better be 9/10! :argh:
 
Figured I'd catch up again with my two cents on the ones you recently reviewed.

The Avengers
What else needs to be said about this one that hasn't already been said? This is one of the crowning achievements for not only Marvel Studios, but for superhero films in general. The Avengers was a huge gamble that more than paid off. It proved that the shared universe made for a better film. The fact that we already were introduced to all the major players in the film (even though one was played by a new actor) made it that much more enjoyable. Seeing them all on screen together for the first time coupled with Joss Whedon's brilliant screenplay was a perfect marriage. Everything was firing on all cylinders and everything clicked. It's hard to pinpoint a standout performance because everyone was great in it. It catapaulted us into a bigger universe and it's just the tip of the iceberg to what Marvel has up its sleeves. This is still my favorite MCU film, but its sequel looks promising enough to knock it off that perch.

Iron Man 3
Phase 2 of the Marvel Cinematic Universe didn't start off as strong as Phase 1. Instead of AC/DC, we get that crappy 90's song "I'm Blue (Da Ba Dee)". Luckily, Phase 2 picked up a hell of a lot of steam that it might even end up better than Phase 1, but I still thought Iron Man 3 could have been so much better. It has its moments and Robert Downey Jr. gives a great performance as usual, but the Mandarin twist is so jarring that it just took me right out of the movie. I loved the chilling performance from Ben Kingsley at the beginning of the movie, but once Trevor shows up it immediately ruins the enjoyment every viewing afterwards. Having said that, I did think that Guy Pearce as Killian was the best villain the Iron Man movies have had so far, even though there's not much to compare him to. The Iron Legion showing up was a nice touch, but then it was short-lived when Tony inexplicably self-destructed them all to appease Pepper. Speaking of which, I hated what was done with her in regards to Extremis powers. Surprisingly, unlike most, the kid didn't bother me because my favorite part of the film might be Tony driving off and ditching him. It's funny...for all the negative things I have to say about it, I still find it more enjoyable than The Incredible Hulk, which makes it the second least favorite MCU film for me, but still not bad. Just disappointing.

Thor: The Dark World
Now here might be the most reviled MCU film so far. I don't think it's as bad as everyone says. It didn't disappoint me like Iron Man 3. I did like it more the first time I saw it, but upon repeat viewings I can see more and more of its flaws. The worst parts of this movie are the Earth scenes with Darcy, even though those didn't bother me as much as they do other people. What did bother me was the boring villain that could have been so much more fleshed out if the movie had been longer. The credits roll on this one at about the 1:45 mark. A longer running time would have definitely improved this one, I think. Characters like Sif and the Warriors Three could have been given more screen time. But there are a few positives. Chris Hemsworth really sells the character in this one. Thor is much more mature in this and you really get the sense that he could be king of Asgard. But the real showstealer in this one is Loki, of course. Tom Hiddleston is the reason why Thor: The Dark World isn't my least favorite MCU film. He's also the reason why this was, believe it or not, my favorite comic book film of 2013. It was kind of a weak year for superhero films.


Keep up the great reviews, Keyser! Looking forward to your reviews for Winter Soldier and Guardians!

Thanks for sharing, Drizzle! I enjoy reading your thoughts on the films... even if we disagree on IRON MAN 3!
 
CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLDIER

2014 was perhaps the most successful year for Marvel Studios yet (though 2015 already seems on course to top it), and it's cinematic dominance started early with CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLDIER getting a jump on the summer movie season with its March release and blowing away all blockbuster competition until... well, GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY in August. THE WINTER SOLDIER very quickly established itself as one of Marvel's very best offerings, far surpassing the enjoyable first film in just about every way.

I've said before that screenwriters Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely are the secret heroes of the CAPTAIN AMERICA franchise. The big strength of the first film was in their characterisation of Steve Rogers, and that carries over here, thanks also to Chris Evans' quiet but commanding screen presence. But the big challenge presented to them this time round was how to make a sequel that was at once a continuation of the story and a reinvention of the character's world. The first film was, after all, a period piece, a sepia-toned pastiche of old-timey World War 2 adventure. But the ending of the previous film leaving Captain America in the present day requires the jettisoning of almost the entirety of the first film's supporting cast to be replaced with a new ensemble, never mind a new setting and aesthetic and a lean into a whole different sub-genre. Markus and McFeely responded by drawing inspiration from the comics: not just the acclaimed CAPTAIN AMERICA comics storyline by Ed Brubaker and Steve Epting whose name this film takes as its title, but also to a large degree Jonathan Hickman's SECRET WARRIORS. Beyond comics, there are aesthetic nods to paranoid conspiracy thrillers like DAY OF THE CONDOR, THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE and THE PARALLAX VIEW.

But while THE WINTER SOLDIER enjoys some additional flavor from the conspiracy thriller flourishes of the narrative, and the little moments of rich characterisation in the early going - such as Steve's visit to the veterans' support group or his bedside vigil with an elderly, ailing Peggy Carter - where this film truly excels is as a masterfully-constructed action movie, and on that front credit must go to directors Joe & Anthony Russo.

Having repeatedly watched (and repeatedly reviewed) THE WINTER SOLDIER, I am somewhat wary of repeating myself, so feel inclined to narrow my focus onto what elements of the film most stand out for me. And more and more with each of my multiple viewings, what impresses the most is just how excellently crafted each action set-piece in this film is.

The opening assault on the Limerian Star battleship often gets the lion's share of the plaudits, and it's a finely crafted opener. As both Captain America and Black Widow cut their way through the mercenaries to reach the hostages contained within, we get efficient (re)introductions to their characters by means of their different fighting styles. In particular, I love how the Russos have the confidence to keep the camera on Captain America for longer stetches upon him first landing on the ship, with the long tracking shot as he runs down the deck, swiping henchmen as he goes, a particular favourite.

The next big action sequence is the attempted assassination/car chase with Nick Fury. In general, this is Nick Fury's best role in an MCU film, feeling like an actual character rather than an agent of exposition and other characters' progression. And a big part of that is down to how compelling he is placed in peril here. One of the things I love about the scene is how quickly it escalates. First, out of nowhere Fury's car is being hit by a police car and he's fracturing a wrist, then there's another two police cars surrounding him, then he's finding out there are no police reported in the area just as the guns start firing into his windows. Then no sooner have we established that his car has a bulletproof shield protecting him than a bigger weapon is brought into play to smash through it. It's breathless, and all the more gratifying when Fury gets to be a badass and turn it around on the bad guys. Then we have a car chase that's all the more gripping for being agonisingly slow, Fury trying to navigate through gridlocked traffic while evading his killers.

But perhaps my favourite action scene in the film is the elevator scene. The build-up is absolutely spot on, as what seems like a quiet transitional scene of Captain America traveling in an escalator and making small talk with some supporting characters starts to turn into something else. If the scene wasn't spoiled for you in the trailers, you probably clock on that things aren't what they seem just after Captain America himself does... as with each floor the elevator stops on, more people crowd onto the elevator, some clutching their guns, others sweating profusely. The Russos could have played the ambush as a surprise, but instead they let the intensity grow and grow to fever pitch, so when the bad guys finally do attack Captain America, it's like an explosion of pent-up energy.

The two Captain America VS The Winter Soldier fights are also fantastic. The first one is another example in the power of holding a take, as the pair's parries and jockeying for control of the knife builds and builds like two master tennis players hitting a volley back and forth on the court, and the more it goes on the more you're waiting for one to slip and one to take control. Then in the climactic showdown, the intensity of the action is perhaps dialed down a notch, but is replaced by emotional stakes. Funnily enough, as an antagonist the Winter Soldier gets less screen-time than the Red Skull got in the first film, and yet we're much more emotionally invested in the final fight than we were in the first film. It's also notable for just how much of a beating Steve Rogers takes.

One of the above sequences would be enough to distinguish a film as a memorable action movie, and yet THE WINTER SOLDIER has all of them. It's a relentless machine of a film, and ranks up with the best the action genre has produced in recent years, even outside of the superhero realm. THE RAID 2 came out in the UK a few short weeks later and was probably better, but THE WINTER SOLDIER was at least in the same ball-park, which is an impressive feat in itself. Considering that lackluster direction was one of the failings of the first film, The Russo Brothers deserve a lot of credit for elevating the CAPTAIN AMERICA franchise. It's no wonder they've been invited to take over for Joss Whedon to direct AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR.

In a lot of ways, CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLDIER raised the bar for Marvel Studios. While THE AVENGERS and its gargantuan success had cemented the fact that Marvel Studios were the best in the game at what they do and that their particular brand of entertainment was exactly what people wanted, here they demonstrated that they could push outwith those expectations and deliver a film that tonally feels quite different from what had come from the studio up until that point. And yet, still the film is utterly immersed in the Marvel Universe, riffing on events and characters from previous films in unexpected ways, and indeed dramatically upending the status quo of the shared universe in what should be some fascinating ways going forward.

9/10
 
Started my MCU movie marathon the other night with Cap 1 and watched IM1 last night, man I had forgotten how good IM1 was, easily the best movie in that series and I don't care what anyone says, between TIH and IM2 something changed with the MCU movies, they went a lot more kid friendly IMO, but thankfully they started going back toward IM/TIH levels with the 2014 movies.
 
I love Captain America: The Winter Soldier. It's a movie I can rewatch many times and enjoy immensely each time. I thought the entire cast was fantastic, and the story keeps you intrigued and invested in the movie at all times.

Another excellent review.
 
I am now around half way through my MCU marathon before seeing AOU. I watched IM2 last night and it's still a lot of fun, I actually enjoyed it more than my last viewing of IM3 but neither compare to the first.

Watched Thor tonight and it's still my favourite phase 1 film, and one of my favourite MCU movies period, it's still great and the story just connects with me so much and it is probably the most emotional MCU movie which puts it up there, such a shame the sequel completely botched what the first movie set up. TIH is next.
 
GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY

One of the biggest things that has marked out GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY for me as an instant classic is just how eminently, effortlessly rewatchable the film is. It was released less than a year ago, and I've seen the film many times, I've easily watched it far more times than any other film less than a year old... and it's never a chore.

Objectively, it's not a perfect film. In particular, the first 20 minutes are a bit patchy, and I'd argue it's not until our ragtag band of heroes end up in intergalactic prison the Kyln that everything truly starts to gel at top gear. But yet, as an overall cinematic experience, I struggle to think of many other films of recent years that were so purely euphoric, a mainline injection of celluloid joy. Already, there are moments like Quill's opening credits dance, Rocket's gag with the prosthetic leg (and later with the cybernetic eye) and "We are Groot" that hit that high note every time in the same way the now-iconic beats in cult favourites like GHOSTBUSTERS, BACK TO THE FUTURE or RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK do. And "You said it, b***h... we're the Guardians of the Galaxy!" might be the biggest "F**K YEAH!" moment Marvel Studios has offered to date.

Just as impressive is that, while there are certain parts of the movie that blow me away just the same with every viewing, there are scenes and characters that I grow to appreciate even more. Rocket and Groot may have been standouts to me first time round, and I still love them, but on this viewing I found myself particularly appreciating the likes of Drax and Yondu. Dave Bautista shows great deadpan comedy chops here, while Michael Rooker continues to enhance his reputation as one of the most efficient scene-stealers in the business. Another element that ensures GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY is a franchise built to sustain a lasting fan following is that the core characters (and even many supporting players) are all so well-realised that any one of them can credibly be someone's favourite.

But my favourite has always remained Peter Quill, AKA Star-Lord. Chris Pratt is a guy I've long liked, going back to his tenure as loveable dimwit Andy Dwyer in PARKS & RECREATION, and while Star-Lord was already a cool character in the comics, I was very excited about the star quality Pratt could bring to the character. And he delivered in spades, quickly establishing himself as Marvel's most charismatic leading man since Robert Downey Jr's Tony Stark. And yet, the more I rewatch, the more I recognise how much sadness lies at the core of the character. As a child, right at the worst moment of his life - when his mother died of cancer - he was snatched from his life on Earth and plunged into space with the Ravagers. And so in a lot of ways, Quill is still a child, having never really been able to process that grief and move past it. As much as his arc in the film is about growing up, becoming less selfish, evolving into a leader and finding a new family in the Guardians, it's also about finally coming to terms with that loss and moving forward from a life that, for all the bravado on the surface, has been one constantly immersed in that pain and loss which only momentarily flares up to the surface. At the end of the film, we find out that Quill insists on being Star-Lord because that's what his mother called him, and it's a crucial character note. Indeed, that extended slow zoom on Quill's face, near tears, as he listens to "Ain't No Mountain High Enough" could be my favourite moment in the film.

It's appropriate to talk about sadness, because perhaps even more than the sense of fun and adventure, it's the underlying sadness that truly elevates GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY. It's something I've come to expect from director James Gunn, as SUPER and (to a lesser degree) SLITHER were films with quite broad (and often crude) genre conceits which were elevated to a whole other level because of the intense sadness and emotion lurking under the surface. It's great that GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY made me laugh out loud so many times. But it's truly impressive that it also had me with a lump in my throat at several points.

Something that is noteworthy about GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY is that it is arguably the closest Marvel Studios has had thus far to an original cinematic property. Sure, the Guardians of the Galaxy do exist in the comics, but the incarnation seen here is relatively recent, and in a lot of ways their film counterparts are very distinct from the source material... though said source material has since altered itself to more closely align with the vision presented in the films. But in a lot of ways, GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY represents Marvel Studios stepping into the height of their powers, showing they can present us with a film not directly connected to their shared Avengers-driven universe (geographically, at least), and without any real brand awareness or history, and it's the Marvel Studios brand that sells it. The film was a gargantuan success at the box office. And, as a cherry on top, that gargantuan success also happens to be a genuinely brilliant movie. After THE AVENGERS, GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY stands as Marvel's second masterpiece.

10/10
 
Phew! It took longer than expected, but I managed to finish my rewatch of all 10 films before seeing AGE OF ULTRON on Monday!
 
Thanks Keyser! It's only been a freakin month! :argh: And thank goodness you gave it a 10/10. I already owe you one arse whooping for making me wait this long. If I owed you two, it may affect my work release program.
 
GOTG is my favourite MCU movie and the best one so far for me, I havent seen AOU yet thought but I am hearing things about it that disappoint me, especially regarding the Hulk. So we will see if it makes it to my number one. I am watching Avengers 1 as part of my MCU marathon.

Watched TIH last night and its aged pretty well and I still enjoy it a lot. 2 moments still make the hair on the back of my neck stand up, the moment when Hulk finally overpowers the Abomination and then straight after when he does the thunder clap to save Betty and Gen. Ross.
 
My thoughts would be:

IM-Great.
TIH-Decent.
IM2-Meh.
Thor-Good.
Captain America: TFA-Good.
The Avengers-Great.
IM3-Meh.
Thor: TDW-Meh.
Captain America: TWS-Great
GOTG-Great.
 
IM3 really gets a lot of flack but it's really not as bad as people say it is. Heck, I think it's better than T:TDW.
 
IM3 is my second favorite CBM thus far, and the best of Marvel's CU for me. I understand where the more negative reviews are coming from, though. I still don't enjoy the massive armor summoning that Tony pulled against the Mandarin.
 
Very well written reviews Keyser. The only one where my opinion differs in a signifigant fashion is GotG. Interesting to note you didn't mention Gamora at all. Or Ronan.
 
Very well written reviews Keyser. The only one where my opinion differs in a signifigant fashion is GotG. Interesting to note you didn't mention Gamora at all. Or Ronan.
Agreed. First he gives TIH a low grade and then completely ignores Gamora. Dude really hates green people.
 
Nice reviews. Can't say I always agree with them, but you do a good job explaining your point of view. :)

Personally, not as thorough as your reviews though:
Iron Man

Positives:
-RDJ's performance, needless to say
-great supporting cast
-the first two thirds of the film have a sense of grit to them that really works well
-in my opinion, one of the best openings to any CBM
-Stane pre-Iron Monger armour is a great villain
-the stuff in Afghanistan is flawless
-the score is one of the best superhero scores and head and shoulders above any other score in the MCU
-solid character arc

Negatives:
-The film, despite some solid scenes after it, feels less interesting somehow after the scene where Tony goes back to Afghanistan as Iron Man
-Stane as Iron Monger doesn't work for me
-the third act loses the grit of the first two acts

8/10

The Incredible Hulk
Positives:
-Edward Norton gives a performance that I feel is quite underrated
-Unlike the Hulk in other films, I feel this one really captures the struggle he has
-The first act is perfect and does a good job giving us a look into Banner's life
-Leterrier does a solid job directing
-As with Iron Man, there's a certain grit to it that makes it feel real and makes it not feel too polished, unfortunately I believe this is the last Marvel film to feel that way
-The action scenes are well done, the standout being the one in the bottling plant

Negatives:
-Liv Tyler feels on auto pilot and I can't blame her, the character is pretty dull
-Not a fan of what they do with Blonsky towards the end
-Though still good, the film's latter two acts definitely don't match the first
-Tim Roth feels wasted
-Villain teasing that will go nowhere

7/10

Iron Man 2
Positives:
+The acting's pretty solid across the board
+Sam Rockwell deserves a spot of his own, he's so much fun to watch
+The plot is solid in it's more broad strokes
+There's some potentially interesting paralleling between Stark's position in the first film to Vanko in this, particularly when he and Hammer have their chat in the hanger. Unfortunately it doesn't do much with this.
+The race track fight is good

Negatives:
-It misses the energy of the original and manages to feel pretty bland
-The score, while decent, is a major step down from the score in the first
-Despite the plot working in broad strokes as I said, the execution doesn't quite work. It ends up feeling dull.
-Some of the dialogue feels like what it is: the actors improvising to try and recapture the spontaneity of the original. It unfortunately fails at it's goal.
-Not too fond of this being Widow's introduction considering how she's handled
-Can't stand the Tony/Rhodey fight
-A lot of Vanko's stuff that made him a better villain was cut

6.5/10

Thor
Positives:
+Loki is great
+The climax between Thor and Loki is one of the best of the MCU. It doesn't feel the need to go into explosions and tons of action, it's almost entirely just on the acting and it really pays off.
+The score
+Hemsworth is good
+The scene where Thor breaks into the SHIELD facility is well done
+The scene between Thor and Loki in that facility is great
+Overall a good story

Negatives:
-Natalie Portman is on autopilot
-Asgard seems too clean and polished. It's very clearly CGI and doesn't look like people actually live there.
-I don't buy Thor and Jane's romance at all
-A lot of the comedy misses
-I find the Destroyer battle dull
7/10

Captain America: The First Avenger
Positives:
+Steve's good
+Peggy's great
+The USO segment is great
+Great supporting cast
+Costuming is outstanding
+The first 2 acts are fantastic

Negatives:
-The third act is much less interesting and I really fail to see why the plane had to be crashed instead of just landed
-Red Skull is wasted
-I don't feel anything for the relationship between Steve and Bucky. Unfortunately this has negative repercussions on Winter Soldier as well
-The backgrounds can look a little too fake at times

7.5/10

The Avengers
Positives:
+Black Widow has a lot more personality here
+The interrogation scene is well handled
+The casting is all perfect, regardless of how I feel on performances
+Hiddleston is fun as Loki, despite my issues with how he's written
+The shot of the team working together in the climax is great, like a cinematic splash page
+I like the new Iron Man armour

Negatives:
-The film looks ugly. It looks like a TV movie at best.
-The resolution is a cop out that seems like Whedon wrote himself into a corner and had Phantom Menace on in the background so he used that
-Character arcs are poorly handled
-Loki's no longer the interesting villain he was in Thor, he's a Saturday morning cartoon bad guy
-The plot is nothing special
-The score is very bland
-Thor is completely wrecked in this film. Starting right off with him arriving on Earth seemingly forgetting everything he learned in his solo movie and just attacking everyone and continuing when he throws his whole relationship with Loki under the bus for a joke
-The forest fight
-The climax is long and uninteresting
-A lot of the jokes just don't work
-Hawkeye wasted

4.5/10

Iron Man 3
Positives:
+The most clever villain plot of the MCU
+Ben Kingsley is so good in this
+The comedy consistently works. While some may feel it goes overboard, I think it ends up working to it's advantage. Remember that this is all from Stark's perspective, recounting the story to Banner. He likely injected it with more comedy and exaggerated things (looking at you, over the top unattractive Killian in the opening and crazy Tony Stark fan).
+Everyone is giving a great performance, RDJ giving his best performance yet
+Tony's arc in this is really well done
+The action is engaging and creative, especially the mansion assault
+The twist works fantastically, playing on expectations and updating the racism of the character's creation to the modern day in a clever and intentional way
+The tone is fun and quirky
+The beginning of the credits is just so much fun XD

Negatives:
-The score, apart from one bit during the mansion attack, is forgettable

8.3/10

Loki: The Dark World a.k.a. Thor: Killing Time Until Avengers 2 a.k.a. Thor: How Not To Make a Sequel Thor: The Dark World
Positives:
+the funeral is gorgeous
+Asgard feels like a real, lived in place this time around
+Loki is perfect
+The casting is all good, despite my numerous performance issues

Negatives:
-Poor plot
-Jane is still a bland character, turned bland plot device
-Malekith is an awful villain and a waste of an actor
-Excess comedy that often doesn't work

6/10

Captain America: The Winter Soldier
Positives:
+Captivating plot
+Great performances all around
+Widow actually has character and is really interesting
+Does great stuff on a thematic level
+Fantastic action scenes
+Good villains
+Decent score

Negatives:
-The climax is much less interesting than the rest of the film
-Due to First Avenger not doing enough to make me care about Bucky and his relationship with Steve, I don't feel their relationship here hits as hard as it should

9/10

Guardians of the Galaxy
Positives:
+Groot and Rocket
+The casting is all perfect, regardless of how they're used
+Pratt makes a character that could have been unlikeable with another actor actually likeable.
+The tone is fun
+Soundtrack. Not the score, the soundtrack.
+The title card intro is great
+Nebula is cool, though underused
+The opening is well done
+A good amount of the humour works

Negatives:
-Gamora. I could write an essay on everything wrong with her. But I'll summarize with: EVERYTHING. There is nothing right with her.
-Ronan makes Malekith look like the most interesting villain ever. He's completely non-threatening, too over the top, uninteresting and incompetent.
-The film is all exposition. We never get to see anything about these people, they just tell it to us.
-The plot is pretty dull.
-The humour has a lot of misses.
-There's a distinct lack of polish with the script, it needed another rewrite.
-The cinematography, while okay, has a too digital look to it.
-The climax is extremely dull.
-The score is forgettable.

6/10
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,557
Messages
21,989,621
Members
45,783
Latest member
mariagrace999
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"