Ant-Man Michael Douglas is Hank Pym

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well since the movie is being made it's obviously not to late. I for one am really excited to see this movie. I don't see how people can complain about a movie that literally has only 3 people cast so far and hardly and plot details released.

Also keep in mind this is The Marvel Cinematic Universe, not Marvel Comics. The MCU uses the comics for inspiration and ideas not a exact copy.

:up: Shhhhh some people don't wanna face reality and accept this.:o
 
Unlikely. The basic "To Steal An Ant-Man" story is that Lang steals the suit without having any idea who it belongs to, or what it even does. The fact that he learns to use it, and use it well, impresses Pym, who begins to mentor him.

The story only works if there's no existing connection between Pym and Lang.

actually, Scott knew who Hank was. I have the issue right in front of me. he finds the ant-man costume and remembers the name on the gate/that Hank Pym used to be Ant-Man. and he credits his quick adaptation to the suit to reading about it in Scientific American magazine (while in prison). even in the cartoon adaptation, he knows that Pym was Ant-Man. otherwise, he probably wouldn't have paid any attention to the costume.
 
Well since the movie is being made it's obviously not to late. I for one am really excited to see this movie. I don't see how people can complain about a movie that literally has only 3 people cast so far and hardly and plot details released.

Also keep in mind this is The Marvel Cinematic Universe, not Marvel Comics. The MCU uses the comics for inspiration and ideas not a exact copy.

^this is exactly how I feel about it. good points!
 
is this Pinata guy confirmed? I thought he was just in talks like Clifton Collins Jr.

he was officially offered the role. there's been no talk of officially accepting. but I don't care. I'm much more interested in who is playing Janet Van Dyne; if someone is playing her.
 
:up: Shhhhh some people don't wanna face reality and accept this.:o

I guess I missed the movies where Tony Stark was married to Aunt Petunia,Cap was a 16 year old girl and Thor was a 78 year old refrigerator salesman.:o
 
he was officially offered the role. there's been no talk of officially accepting. but I don't care. I'm much more interested in who is playing Janet Van Dyne; if someone is playing her.
agreed. I was just wondering who the ominous third cast actor would be
 
Well since the movie is being made it's obviously not to late. I for one am really excited to see this movie. I don't see how people can complain about a movie that literally has only 3 people cast so far and hardly and plot details released.

Also keep in mind this is The Marvel Cinematic Universe, not Marvel Comics. The MCU uses the comics for inspiration and ideas not a exact copy.

:up:
 
I guess I missed the movies where Tony Stark was married to Aunt Petunia,Cap was a 16 year old girl and Thor was a 78 year old refrigerator salesman.:o

Did you see the ones where whiplash and Crimson Dynamo were the same person, Justin Hammer was a young man, Aldrich Killian was a young man who didn't kill himself, Bucky Barnes fell out of a train and wasn't blown up, The Red Skull got a super soldier serum dose, Heimdall was black, and Malekith, Tony Stark and many others did not act anything like their comic book counterparts? (Granted, movie Tony Starl is at least way more entertaining than comic book Tony Stark)

All of this Hyperbole for a guy who is the same character at a different point in his career who's age should not even factor into how well he does his job (or did).
 
With Douglas playing Pym and Rudd as Lang I wonder if Pym might be showing up in A2 to be on hand for Ultron's creation after all...?

Kevin Feige had said that Ant Man was off limits until after Wright did his movie, but nothing about Pym...

Ant-Man comes out after A2, so that is unlikely. Whedon already said Pym would not be involved with Ultron in the film anyway.

Well since the movie is being made it's obviously not to late. I for one am really excited to see this movie. I don't see how people can complain about a movie that literally has only 3 people cast so far and hardly and plot details released.

Also keep in mind this is The Marvel Cinematic Universe, not Marvel Comics. The MCU uses the comics for inspiration and ideas not a exact copy.

Exactly and it would be pretty boring if it was an exact copy. All the Marvel films have taken their liberties.

And honestly, this films sounds really interesting, especially since it introduces the concept of legacy heroes.
 
Last edited:
I guess I missed the movies where Tony Stark was married to Aunt Petunia,Cap was a 16 year old girl and Thor was a 78 year old refrigerator salesman.:o

Did you also miss the ones where Pepper Potts is Tony Stark's soulmate instead of his secretary? Or Jarvis is an AI instead of a butler? Or Bucky was a grown man Cap's age instead of a gawky teenage sidekick? Or Rick Jones wasn't in the Avengers? Or Tony Stark became Iron Man in Afghanistan instead of Vietnam? Or Hulk was created from an offshoot of the super-soldier serum instead of gamma radiation? Or Sif wasn't Thor's queen? Or Cap hooked up with Black Widow instead of Sharon Carter?

It's a simple matter of adapting to a new century and a moviegoing audience instead of a monolithic geekboy culture from 50+ years of comic fandom. Hell, I hate to see major deviations from canon, too, but the cases where thinking outside the box reaches new audiences and creates something more relevant to the 21st century instead of what the world looked like 50 years ago is a plus in my book.
 
Well since the movie is being made it's obviously not to late. I for one am really excited to see this movie. I don't see how people can complain about a movie that literally has only 3 people cast so far and hardly and plot details released.

Also keep in mind this is The Marvel Cinematic Universe, not Marvel Comics. The MCU uses the comics for inspiration and ideas not a exact copy.

But this movie was'nt made for the mcu and it's clearly showing. it's clearly a standalone film being shoe horned in causing rifts. they could've had hank be part of the ultron arc if it was'nt for this.

:up: Shhhhh some people don't wanna face reality and accept this.:o

Isn't the forum for speculation. if we all shut our mouths and waited for the movies to come out it would'nt be very fun would it?

Did you see the ones where whiplash and Crimson Dynamo were the same person, Justin Hammer was a young man, Aldrich Killian was a young man who didn't kill himself, Bucky Barnes fell out of a train and wasn't blown up, The Red Skull got a super soldier serum dose, Heimdall was black, and Malekith, Tony Stark and many others did not act anything like their comic book counterparts? (Granted, movie Tony Starl is at least way more entertaining than comic book Tony Stark)

All of this Hyperbole for a guy who is the same character at a different point in his career who's age should not even factor into how well he does his job (or did).

and Iron man 2 failed to hit the mark did it not?? so thanks for helping make my point.

how many panels did aldrich have in that one comic? throwaway character used for plot twist, not bad at all.

pretty sure that's part of red skulls origin, def in the ultimates anyway.

Bucky was not blown up, how do you think they made the winter soldier, sew him back together?

I can see the heimdal thing annoy people, but he's not that much of a fleshed out character so i got over it.

RE: RDJ ...why... cos he talked fast? is he not a witty flirty genius in the comics to no?
 
Did you also miss the ones where Pepper Potts is Tony Stark's soulmate instead of his secretary? Or Jarvis is an AI instead of a butler? Or Bucky was a grown man Cap's age instead of a gawky teenage sidekick? Or Rick Jones wasn't in the Avengers? Or Tony Stark became Iron Man in Afghanistan instead of Vietnam? Or Hulk was created from an offshoot of the super-soldier serum instead of gamma radiation? Or Sif wasn't Thor's queen? Or Cap hooked up with Black Widow instead of Sharon Carter?

It's a simple matter of adapting to a new century and a moviegoing audience instead of a monolithic geekboy culture from 50+ years of comic fandom. Hell, I hate to see major deviations from canon, too, but the cases where thinking outside the box reaches new audiences and creates something more relevant to the 21st century instead of what the world looked like 50 years ago is a plus in my book.

fair enough about pepper, but none of Tony's love interests have been a major significances.
There is an a.i version of Jarvis in the comics also.
why would rick be in the avengers? he is not an original member. and he is not in the mcu which was another mistake.

yes they have to update the characters with the times or else the mcu would be mostly set in an old folks home.

super soldier serum was an extension for hulks origin but it still involves gamma.

and it's early days for Thor, he still has to go through jane foster. he is'nt even king yet why would he have a queen? ( if its something to do with thor 2 i havent seen it so no spoilers, i'll accept i'm wrong if it is)

regarding sharon carter, it's still early days
 
Bucky Barnes fell out of a train and wasn't blown up

Bucky was not blown up,

:huh:

It's a simple matter of adapting to a new century and a moviegoing audience instead of a monolithic geekboy culture from 50+ years of comic fandom. Hell, I hate to see major deviations from canon, too, but the cases where thinking outside the box reaches new audiences and creates something more relevant to the 21st century instead of what the world looked like 50 years ago is a plus in my book.

RkbPD0H.gif
 
you can never mention a problem about a female character without the sexist accusation.
Truth is Wasp is apart of the package for cryin out loud ofcourse she can't be on her own?? they're married for cryin out loud.

Wrong on both counts. Suggesting that she can only be a hero if he is with Hank is sexist because she has been a solo hero and have even been the leader of the Avengers.

Janet and Pym have also been divorced for years now anyway, so being in a relationship with him is not required.

As for getting her powers, there are hundreds of other ways for her to get them. Especially if you with the universes where she is a scientist herself.

But this movie was'nt made for the mcu and it's clearly showing.

You are basing this one what? Because it is obviously being made for the MCU because it's going to be part of the MCU. You also keep forgetting that the MCu is a completely different universe and continuity from the comics, it's not suppose to be the same. It's not that hard to understand.
 
Last edited:
But this movie was'nt made for the mcu and it's clearly showing. it's clearly a standalone film being shoe horned in causing rifts. they could've had hank be part of the ultron arc if it was'nt for this

That's your opinion. Their is literally no evidence that this movie is shoe horned in. You just don't like the idea of an old Pym and him not having a hand in Ultrons creation. Which is totally fine. You have the right to feel how you want. But everything Marvel does is planned out years in advance. To act like they just decided to throw a antman movie in the process is short sighted.
 
That's your opinion. Their is literally no evidence that this movie is shoe horned in. You just don't like the idea of an old Pym and him not having a hand in Ultrons creation. Which is totally fine. You have the right to feel how you want. But everything Marvel does is planned out years in advance. To act like they just decided to throw a antman movie in the process is short sighted.

this movie has been drafted years before the mcu was made. It was going to be a stand alone movie. then the mcu came along but wright still had axis to antman which is why he couldnt be used. So now they are working in wrights antman to the mcu

Wrong on both counts. Suggesting that she can only be a hero if he is with Hank is sexist because she has been a solo hero and have even been the leader of the Avengers.

Janet and Pym have also been divorced for years now anyway, so being in a relationship with him is not required.

As for getting her powers, there are hundreds of other ways for her to get them. Especially if you with the universes where she is a scientist herself.



You are basing this one what? Because it is obviously being made for the MCU because it's going to be part of the MCU. You also keep forgetting that the MCu is a completely different universe and continuity from the comics, it's not suppose to be the same. It's not that hard to understand.

the most sexist thing is when woman accuses men for being sexist when trying to discuss a woman character and don't depict as being the best thing ever created. truth is men and woman are equal so i'm sorry, there is no special treatment when discussing a woman.

she debuted being alongside antman, and it's irrelevant where they are in life in the comics.

Robin is now his own character.. but it wouldnt be right for him to be in the first JL movie and not have batman in it or have no connection to him
 
and Iron man 2 failed to hit the mark did it not?? so thanks for helping make my point.

how many panels did aldrich have in that one comic? throwaway character used for plot twist, not bad at all.

pretty sure that's part of red skulls origin, def in the ultimates anyway.

Bucky was not blown up, how do you think they made the winter soldier, sew him back together?

I can see the heimdal thing annoy people, but he's not that much of a fleshed out character so i got over it.

RE: RDJ ...why... cos he talked fast? is he not a witty flirty genius in the comics to no?
Iron Man II was awesome and certainly made a decent amount of money so, for me, it hit it's mark. Any criticism people had with it was definitely NOT because of changes made to characters. So don't thank me when the structure of your point is still wafer thin.

From what I can tell your point is less about staying faithful (because you would care about these throwaway characters as well) and more about just keeping the main characters the way that you want them. I say if they get the core of the character correct then success. Everything else about them is vestigial dressing.

As for Tony Stark, dude is boring as crap in the comics. It's like him and Hawkeye exchanged personalities for the movies or something. Unless Tony Stark in the comics is drunk he is all serious business and can never maintain my attention enough to continuously buy his books. That dude is just not engaging. He got even worse after Civil War.

QUICK EDIT: Red Skull was a scientist in a red mask who got sprayed with his own deadly gas. Bucky Barnes was blown up by Baron Zemo on a rocket. Just a little bit of comic book knowledge for you.
 
Last edited:
Iron Man II was awesome and certainly made a decent amount of money so, for me, it hit it's mark. Any criticism people had with it was definitely NOT because of changes made to characters. So don't thank me when the structure of your point is still wafer thin.

From what I can tell your point is less about staying faithful (because you would care about these throwaway characters as well) and more about just keeping the main characters the way that you want them. I say if they get the core of the character correct then success. Everything else about them is vestigial dressing.

As for Tony Stark, dude is boring as crap in the comics. It's like him and Hawkeye exchanged personalities for the movies or something. Unless Tony Stark in the comics is drunk he is all serious business and can never maintain my attention enough to continuously buy his books. That dude is just not engaging. He got even worse after Civil War.

QUICK EDIT: Red Skull was a scientist in a red mask who got sprayed with his own deadly gas. Bucky Barnes was blown up by Baron Zemo on a rocket. Just a little bit of comic book knowledge for you.

ok you like im2 i won't get into that so.

uh no i care about the characters that people payed money to watch or read for longer then you or i have been around. i'm not saying stay 100 percent to the comics i understand things need to be tweeked, and i like the tweeking by all means it makes things more interesting. but they are not tweaking hank-ant man they are using the same name and proffession and thats as far as it goes.

fair enough about tony

okay i will ask you the same question again, if bucky was blown up how is he the winter soldier now? stitched him back together?

sooooo was he blown up...or did it seem like he was blown up. add that to your comic knowledge
 
I guess I missed the movies where Tony Stark was married to Aunt Petunia,Cap was a 16 year old girl and Thor was a 78 year old refrigerator salesman.:o

Ummmmm I guess you read all these right?
Did you also miss the ones where Pepper Potts is Tony Stark's soulmate instead of his secretary? Or Jarvis is an AI instead of a butler? Or Bucky was a grown man Cap's age instead of a gawky teenage sidekick? Or Rick Jones wasn't in the Avengers? Or Tony Stark became Iron Man in Afghanistan instead of Vietnam? Or Hulk was created from an offshoot of the super-soldier serum instead of gamma radiation? Or Sif wasn't Thor's queen? Or Cap hooked up with Black Widow instead of Sharon Carter?
Did you see the ones where whiplash and Crimson Dynamo were the same person, Justin Hammer was a young man, Aldrich Killian was a young man who didn't kill himself, Bucky Barnes fell out of a train and wasn't blown up, The Red Skull got a super soldier serum dose, Heimdall was black, and Malekith, Tony Stark and many others did not act anything like their comic book counterparts? (Granted, movie Tony Starl is at least way more entertaining than comic book Tony Stark)

If you did then....
39677-the-Big-Bang-theory-you-got-se-mdOC.gif
 
Ummmmm I guess you read all these right?


If you did then....
39677-the-Big-Bang-theory-you-got-se-mdOC.gif


um dude, maybe you should read my responses to cos your so called service is nothing more then irrelevant jabber. truth is even though everyone has the right to there own opinion and i respect that. But if ye are on a super hero forum and are praising an idea of a superhero film and there taking away the majority of things that make him who he is then ye'r opinions are just ''meh'' to me.

super hero movies have evolved and improved over the years..and now your praising what sounds to be a step backwards. tsk tsk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,289
Messages
22,080,705
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"