Missing Elements/Themes in the Movie...

I dont mean to be blunt here Nell or mean any offense at all but I think you have got this one totally and utterly wrong, he doesnt refer to any other mutants in the movie as animals, only Wolverine, and this was for a reason, because it alluded to a past that Logan had were he was indeed an animal and did animalistic things. Stryker only refers to other mutants as mutants or YOU/THEM in the movie.

Why would he later say to Logan also "...you were an animal then, you're an animal now...." Its obvious he was referring to Logan's past when calling him an animal.

I take no offense to it, your's is just a different opinion (wrong, I might add :p - I kid I kid)

The reason I say that is because Stryker obviously sees mutants as nothing more than lab rats in X2. "Oh, they serve their purpose, as long as they can be controlled". As long as he can have control over them, they are useful. If he cannot, then they must be exterminated. He obviously sees them as lesser being, as nothing more than animals.

Now, I do agree that there is some obvious hint to Logan's past in that line, although I do believe there is a lot of Stryker's manipulation in there as well.

Okay, okay, I'll admit, Wolverine could have been a bit more viscous, but I don't think that Logan is -not- an animal in this movie. I mean, sure, we don't see him ripping out people's guts in bloody fashion, but I also don't think we need to.

The movie is meant to take place in a fantasized real world setting. It's not as far out there as the comic books are. We see Logan being "an animal" in 3 movies already. He lives as a cage fighter, living like a nomad, probably living off of whatever scraps he can scrounge. Sounds kind of like an animal to me. He blindly attacks Jean Grey as she is actually trying to nurse him back to health, nearly choking her. He violently awakens from a dream, stabbing Rogue through the chest. This is all just in X-Men.

In X-Men 2 we see his berserker rage for the first time as Stryker's soldiers attack the mansion. We see that same berserker rage again in X-Men 3 when we has that violent fight in the forest against Magneto's minions.

So we've seen him being an animal, we know how violent he can be if he allows himself to give into his nature.

I mean, and really, we see it in Wolverine too. Maybe it's not as much as people would like, but it's -THERE-.

Throughout the course of how many years is it, he's fighting in 4 different wars. He's become so jaded to war and violence that he's puffing on a cigar as he's getting off the boats on the beaches of Normandy. Sure, he wouldn't be worried about dying himself, but he's obviously not concerned with the lives of his fellow soldiers, nor the lives that he is about to take in combat. I mean, he's standing right next to some young kid who's probably no older than 18, who's obviously scared ****less, and all Logan can do is give a look like "whatever" and take a drag off his cigar.

We also see it when he lines up side by side with his brother to take out his fellow soldiers in the jungles of Vietnam.

Logan then also joins up with Stryker's team, and becomes an accompliss to some rather bad things. The slaughter of innocent villiagers, all over what amounts to a rock in his eyes?

But that's the point. That he is -not- an animal. Creed is the animal. Creed embraces it, and wants to be the animal. Logan doesn't. We've seen what he is capable of, and he gives into it whenever he brawls against Creed, but the point is that he's fighting against it.

Logan becomes so blinded and consumed by rage that after seeing the love of his life "murdered", he does nothing but seek out Creed to enact his vengeance, which he loses in a rather brutal and animalistic fight. He joins up again with Stryker, a man who he doesn't trust, simply out of revenge. He pretty brutally murders Agent Zero, both in self defense and in retribution for what happens to the Hudsons.

I see the talk of "animal" as 2 things:

1. Manipulation by Stryker and Creed. They -want- him to give in to what he is capable of being, for their own personal gain.

2. Logan is a very dangerous person.

And he is. Logan is one of the most dangerous characters in the X-Men universe, and the movies have captured that. An indestructable man, with insane regenerative powers who has a bit of a temper tantrum? Logan is -dangerous-, like an animal. If Logan doesn't control himself, he can be a very major threat to whomever he encounters. And he is a very dangerous threat to those that he encounters. He has been throughout 4 movies.

But Creed thrives off of his powers, and how dangerous he can be. So he becomes a ruthless stalker / murderer, just like in the comics.

Creed and Logan aren't literally "animals". It's metaphors for how dangerous they are, and how much more dangerous they can be if they give into their urges.

Creed and Logan aren't possessed by some animal demons that they have to supress or else they become mindless killing machines, and it seems to me like that's all people want. I have NEVER in my life seen Logan like that at all. I've always seen him as a very dangerous man, that if he does give into his rage, will deal out some very heavy damage, and there will be casualties. But he's not some blind raging animal that can't be contained because he's madly possessed.
 
Hey I'm just wondering if all the captured mutants were there to help contribute to the creation of a super mutant, how come their powers weren't present in Weapon XI? Or were they present in previous iterations, which failed?
 
Hey I'm just wondering if all the captured mutants were there to help contribute to the creation of a super mutant, how come their powers weren't present in Weapon XI? Or were they present in previous iterations, which failed?

-SOME- of the mutants were used for Weapon XI (Logan, Wraith, Cyclops), but I think a lot of the mutants were just captured because Stryker was constantly doing experiments with mutants, and what they could do.
 
Wolverine's berserker rage/struggle with his animalistic side and Weapon X escape scene not being horrifying like it was in the X2 flashback were missing elements/themes, IMO.
 
yea it was like a walk in operation lol comes in, gets the adamantium, goes home.. no recovery or nothing.. yea i know he has a healing factor but cmon he jumped outta that water like nothing happened.. and btw.. he was supposed to lose his memory rite after the operation.. he wasnt even supposed to remember he had bone claws... he was supposed to be in shock and horror the very 1st time he popped his claws after the operation.. it was like he was finding out for the 1st time he had claws.. yet they glossed over that in the movie.. such a shame.. couldve added more drama to the story..
 
Hey I'm just wondering if all the captured mutants were there to help contribute to the creation of a super mutant, how come their powers weren't present in Weapon XI? Or were they present in previous iterations, which failed?

The Weapon X1 used Cyclops' blasts, Wraith's teleporting, Wolverine's healing and Bolt's interaction with technology as far as i can see. Also, Stryker may have used his son's mind-control serum. The Bolt power was passive in as much as it allowed Stryker to control Weapon X1, rather than Weapon X1 to control technology. But Bolt's natural interface with electronic equipment seemed to be there in the way Stryker gave computer commands.
 
yea it was like a walk in operation lol comes in, gets the adamantium, goes home.. no recovery or nothing.. yea i know he has a healing factor but cmon he jumped outta that water like nothing happened.. and btw.. he was supposed to lose his memory rite after the operation.. he wasnt even supposed to remember he had bone claws... he was supposed to be in shock and horror the very 1st time he popped his claws after the operation.. it was like he was finding out for the 1st time he had claws.. yet they glossed over that in the movie.. such a shame.. couldve added more drama to the story..

If he lost his memory before, during or directly after the procedure, he wouldn't have any feelings towards Stryker, Victor or Kayla because he wouldn't remember them. To show him wanting revenge against Stryker and Victor, and feeling something for Kayla's betrayal, meant he had to remember them. Come on, this is basic stuff to make the story work - please don't go all dumb and stupid on us.
 
I take no offense to it, your's is just a different opinion (wrong, I might add :p - I kid I kid)

The reason I say that is because Stryker obviously sees mutants as nothing more than lab rats in X2. "Oh, they serve their purpose, as long as they can be controlled". As long as he can have control over them, they are useful. If he cannot, then they must be exterminated. He obviously sees them as lesser being, as nothing more than animals.

Now, I do agree that there is some obvious hint to Logan's past in that line, although I do believe there is a lot of Stryker's manipulation in there as well.

While I have no doubt Stryker thinks like that, he is clearly referring to Wolverine when he says animal, otherwise why would he say "I didnt realise XAVIER was taking in animals." He would have called Xavier an animal rather Xavier, and he KNEW Xavier took in mutants, so why would he even say it to Wolverine. The line was clearly meant to allude to Logan's past, to me its crystal clear. Otherwise he wouldnt have mentioned Xavier (as Xavier for one) taking in animals once he saw Wolverine. He wouldnt have any need to call Wolverine anything if he thought of all mutants as animal's.

Okay, okay, I'll admit, Wolverine could have been a bit more viscous, but I don't think that Logan is -not- an animal in this movie. I mean, sure, we don't see him ripping out people's guts in bloody fashion, but I also don't think we need to.

The movie is meant to take place in a fantasized real world setting. It's not as far out there as the comic books are. We see Logan being "an animal" in 3 movies already. He lives as a cage fighter, living like a nomad, probably living off of whatever scraps he can scrounge. Sounds kind of like an animal to me. He blindly attacks Jean Grey as she is actually trying to nurse him back to health, nearly choking her. He violently awakens from a dream, stabbing Rogue through the chest. This is all just in X-Men.

In X-Men 2 we see his berserker rage for the first time as Stryker's soldiers attack the mansion. We see that same berserker rage again in X-Men 3 when we has that violent fight in the forest against Magneto's minions.

So we've seen him being an animal, we know how violent he can be if he allows himself to give into his nature.

I mean, and really, we see it in Wolverine too. Maybe it's not as much as people would like, but it's -THERE-.

Throughout the course of how many years is it, he's fighting in 4 different wars. He's become so jaded to war and violence that he's puffing on a cigar as he's getting off the boats on the beaches of Normandy. Sure, he wouldn't be worried about dying himself, but he's obviously not concerned with the lives of his fellow soldiers, nor the lives that he is about to take in combat. I mean, he's standing right next to some young kid who's probably no older than 18, who's obviously scared ****less, and all Logan can do is give a look like "whatever" and take a drag off his cigar.

We also see it when he lines up side by side with his brother to take out his fellow soldiers in the jungles of Vietnam.

Logan then also joins up with Stryker's team, and becomes an accompliss to some rather bad things. The slaughter of innocent villiagers, all over what amounts to a rock in his eyes?

But that's the point. That he is -not- an animal. Creed is the animal. Creed embraces it, and wants to be the animal. Logan doesn't. We've seen what he is capable of, and he gives into it whenever he brawls against Creed, but the point is that he's fighting against it.

Logan becomes so blinded and consumed by rage that after seeing the love of his life "murdered", he does nothing but seek out Creed to enact his vengeance, which he loses in a rather brutal and animalistic fight. He joins up again with Stryker, a man who he doesn't trust, simply out of revenge. He pretty brutally murders Agent Zero, both in self defense and in retribution for what happens to the Hudsons.

I see the talk of "animal" as 2 things:

1. Manipulation by Stryker and Creed. They -want- him to give in to what he is capable of being, for their own personal gain.

2. Logan is a very dangerous person.

And he is. Logan is one of the most dangerous characters in the X-Men universe, and the movies have captured that. An indestructable man, with insane regenerative powers who has a bit of a temper tantrum? Logan is -dangerous-, like an animal. If Logan doesn't control himself, he can be a very major threat to whomever he encounters. And he is a very dangerous threat to those that he encounters. He has been throughout 4 movies.

But Creed thrives off of his powers, and how dangerous he can be. So he becomes a ruthless stalker / murderer, just like in the comics.

Creed and Logan aren't literally "animals". It's metaphors for how dangerous they are, and how much more dangerous they can be if they give into their urges.

Creed and Logan aren't possessed by some animal demons that they have to supress or else they become mindless killing machines, and it seems to me like that's all people want. I have NEVER in my life seen Logan like that at all. I've always seen him as a very dangerous man, that if he does give into his rage, will deal out some very heavy damage, and there will be casualties. But he's not some blind raging animal that can't be contained because he's madly possessed.


The stuff in X1-X3 doesnt really count towards him being an animal, as he was obviously a not very nice person before he got his memory wiped. This movie just totally failed to capture that in most aspects. Sure he becomes animalistic in some scene's but they are only after Kayla died or he realised he had been played, which anyone would be pissed off at.
 
yea it was like a walk in operation lol comes in, gets the adamantium, goes home.. no recovery or nothing.. yea i know he has a healing factor but cmon he jumped outta that water like nothing happened.. and btw.. he was supposed to lose his memory rite after the operation.. he wasnt even supposed to remember he had bone claws... he was supposed to be in shock and horror the very 1st time he popped his claws after the operation.. it was like he was finding out for the 1st time he had claws.. yet they glossed over that in the movie.. such a shame.. couldve added more drama to the story..

The ONLY way that could of worked is if the experimentation and escape was the final part of the movie, which it wasn't.

What is he supposed to do for the last half of the film if he can't remember anything?
 
The stuff in X1-X3 doesnt really count towards him being an animal, as he was obviously a not very nice person before he got his memory wiped. This movie just totally failed to capture that in most aspects. Sure he becomes animalistic in some scene's but they are only after Kayla died or he realised he had been played, which anyone would be pissed off at.

Sure, anyone would be pissed about that.

But not just anyone would go blindly seeking revenge to the point that they allow themselves to become a test subject for a mad scientists secret experiments, with the purpose of -killing- someone.

Logan is considered an animal because of how dangerous he is when he allows himself to become consumed by his rage - which he does.

He is not some blind, mindless animal that just randomly goes around chopping people to bits, which seems to be what people wanted to see. Hell, that's not even animalistic, that's just evil.

But, being very dangerous, having the capability to emotionally snap and give in to your rage? That's animalistic. Which is why Logan is called an animal.
 
If he lost his memory before, during or directly after the procedure, he wouldn't have any feelings towards Stryker, Victor or Kayla because he wouldn't remember them. To show him wanting revenge against Stryker and Victor, and feeling something for Kayla's betrayal, meant he had to remember them. Come on, this is basic stuff to make the story work - please don't go all dumb and stupid on us.

lol X don’t be such a creep.. I wasn’t speaking in regards to the movie in that sense.. maybe I shouldve been more clear, yea no ish.. if he woulda lost his memory after the procedure then duh it wouldn’t work.. im speaking regarding comic story wise how the time line of events should have went down..and would have made the story more impactful (imo).. it would have been nice to write it out that way and make it work, im sure they could have. the same way they decided to write around other things and make it work for the movie..(such geniuses) lol instead of the cheesy "revenge" cliché plot we got, not to see that all revenge plots are cheesy, just that this one was rushed and poorly written.. I could think of tons of scenes that coulda been eliminated to impliment what I suggested to fit in this film to make for a better story.. seems like they didn’t alot enough time to tell a good story.. the thread is Elements/Themes missing.. well there ya go... I think an additional 20-30 minutes of story telling would have made all the difference and saved us from connecting the dots time and filling in the blanks .. lol
 
Last edited:
The ONLY way that could of worked is if the experimentation and escape was the final part of the movie, which it wasn't.

What is he supposed to do for the last half of the film if he can't remember anything?

im sure those excellent story writers couldve conjured up sumthing... hell most of on here have already... lol
 
Sure, anyone would be pissed about that.

But not just anyone would go blindly seeking revenge to the point that they allow themselves to become a test subject for a mad scientists secret experiments, with the purpose of -killing- someone.

Logan is considered an animal because of how dangerous he is when he allows himself to become consumed by his rage - which he does.

He is not some blind, mindless animal that just randomly goes around chopping people to bits, which seems to be what people wanted to see. Hell, that's not even animalistic, that's just evil.

But, being very dangerous, having the capability to emotionally snap and give in to your rage? That's animalistic. Which is why Logan is called an animal.

I dont think anyone was expecting him to be a murderer, but be an animal, blow up about things normal humans wouldnt, take petty grievences too far, which Wolverine tends to do. I remember an amazing scene in the cartoon, were he nearly rips a guy in half in a traffic incident, and when Jubilee tried to stop him, he turned on her and nearly harmed her because he was so blinded by rage he didnt realise who she was. THIS would have been a perfect scene in the movie, and we nearly got it with the bridge scene. But they have to show things like this sometimes, not just allude to them. As I mentioned earlier also, a scene of Wolverine hunting a dear with a pack of wolves in the Canadian rockies would have been amazing.
 
I had an issue with this inconsistancy:

In X2 Wolverine was shot in the head. The bullet knocked him off his feet, and rendered him unconscious for minutes. In XOW, Agent Zero shoots him staright in the head, and it bearly knocks his head back-to where he can simply shrug it off...wtf..?
 
Last edited:
Well you could say he was in berserker mode when Zero shot him in the head. All be it a watered down berserker mode!
 
Please don't call people names when you disagree.

boy Danoyse.. i hate to get childish about this BUT i wasnt calling anyone names malisciously.. i meant it in jest.. which is why i put LOL to show humor.. i would never call anyone names on a forum board just because its beneath me.. but honestly he was disagreeing with me and said "Come on, this is basic stuff to make the story work - please don't go all dumb and stupid on us." how come you dont say anything to him? lol jeez make me feel like im 10 when you step in like that.. lol
and im typing all this with a smile on my face so please dont think im upset.. all in good fun, but whats good for the goose is good for the gander, no? ;)
 
I had an issue with this inconsistancy:

In X2 Wolverine was shot in the head. The bullet knocked him off his feet, and rendered him unconscious for minutes. In XOW, Agent Zero shoots him staright in the head, and it bearly knocks his head back-to where he can simply shrug it off...wtf..?

Chalk anouther one up on the inconsistancy board..
 
Last edited:
and can anyone tell me why Blob of ALLLLLLL the people they couldve gone with was in team x? i mean Blob?? really??? how silly was that? totally out of place... i wouldve gone with a no namer.. just make up a new charecter if need be.. but not Blob lmao i just dont see how it needed to be him...

And correct me if I'm wrong.. but doesnt Zero become Zero after hes Maverick?? why did that get switched?
 
Well you could say he was in berserker mode when Zero shot him in the head. All be it a watered down berserker mode!

There's that, one could also argue the different forces from the cop being a lot closer to Logan than Zero was. The cop was practically at point blank range.

But it's no more inconsistent than Rogue literally nearly killing everyone she barely touches in X-Men, to barely having any kind of effect on Pyro or Iceman in X2 after a make out session and a vice grip over the ankle.
 
In X2 Wolverine was shot in the head. The bullet knocked him off his feet, and rendered him unconscious for minutes. In XOW, Agent Zero shoots him staright in the head, and it bearly knocks his head back-to where he can simply shrug it off...wtf..?

I really hated that.

In X1-X2, Wolverine was very vulnerable. It made scenes with him more interesting. In X-Men Origins: Wolverine he was like a Terminator. :csad:
 
There's that, one could also argue the different forces from the cop being a lot closer to Logan than Zero was. The cop was practically at point blank range.

I'd say that and the berserker rage were enough to not call that an inconsistency. Wolverine was raging enough to be able to shake it off IMO, so I dont really consider that one an inconsistency personally. In X2 he also wasnt expecting it, its like a punch, if someone punches you and you arent expecting it, they can knock you out, if that same person punched you and you were expecting it, you can brace yourself and its very doubtful you would be knocked out. Depending on the puncher of course.

But it's no more inconsistent than Rogue literally nearly killing everyone she barely touches in X-Men, to barely having any kind of effect on Pyro or Iceman in X2 after a make out session and a vice grip over the ankle.

I dont think thats an inconsistency either, in X2, she had been at the school learning how to control her powers, as all mutants do, by then she knew how to touch someone and not knock them out or nearly kill them.
 
IMO, I think they should of showed Wolverine as a beast during the war & Team X missions. Then he kills a kid or a mother or something & he gets emotionally f***ed up & starts trying to control the animal within. It'd also be a better explanation for why he leaves.
 
IMO, I think they should of showed Wolverine as a beast during the war & Team X missions. Then he kills a kid or a mother or something & he gets emotionally f***ed up & starts trying to control the animal within. It'd also be a better explanation for why he leaves.

That would have given alot more depth to the character, and a REASON why he wants to control the animal within.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"