I finally saw this yesterday in some hidden little theater in a shady neighbourhood in Brussels (It looked what I imagine a porn theatre may look like...) and I'm not quite sure what to think of it. I had some vague notion of the premise but I knew next to nothing about it. I purposely avoided the trailers and reviews.
This flick was so different, I hardly know what to make of it. It's a weird movie man, it's weird. And I don't mean to say it's some rampant crazy art-house flick but it's off-beat. The only thing I'm really sure of is the greatness of Rockwell's performance (surely the best performance he's ever given, and he has never been anything less than solid). The only human Sam interacts with is himself and that is just a very odd thing to watch. In a good way ofcourse. Usually when an actor plays a double role there are atleast some more people to interact with (think Adaptation). But this is just Sam and Sam all the time. A pretty bold thing to do, for both director and actor. So in this aspect this film is unique. The Sam's are never very hard to keep apart, because Rockwell makes the both of them look like entirely different people. The idea behind this is very intriguing. Just imagine if you could talk and interact with yourself, both persons physically representing aspects of your personality. One Sam was the grizzled cynic, the other the young buck loudmouth. The interactions were really just like with an other actor, even touching at times. Again, think of the notion of talking to another physical representation of yourself, having the same heartaches and comforting the other you, thus partly comforting yourself. As said, this aspect is what really makes the film stand out.
So this movie had some great existentialistic ideas in it, (what makes you, you? How do you really know it IS you?) which still have me thinking. It might be that the ideas are so big that they eclipse the movie. And the structure of the movie really didn't remind me of anything else. At the point in the movie where the clone-thing is revelead, it isn't played as a huge shocking fact. In fact it's almost as if it's presented as something to **** with the protagonist. As if the writers said: ''Mmm, let's see how THIS affects this guy..''. It was like experimentation with his pysche. It seemed scientific, not cinematic. And if you think I spent this paragraph trashing the movie: I don't think I did. I'm thinking while I'm typing this....trying to figure out this flick. There was near the ending some suspense-esque thing with the rescue mission arriving and Sam leaving in the rocket but this seemed like some cinematic Hollywood-style gift wrapping to present more ideas. Perhaps a bit too much, for I though that the ending was rather rushed and poorly executed (the voices talking about Sam's return) but on the other hand I can also imagine why they did it in that rushed way. Showing the return of Sam and the fall of Lunar Industries would have broken the pace and mood of the film. But on another hand (three hands?) perhaps they should have thought of a different ending altogether.
Cinematically it was well-shot, the SFX looked good most of the time, other times they looked like what they were; models. The music was subtle and it accompanied the scenes and emotions really well. They're not tunes I can hum but it's an excellent film score that does it's job.
I think I have written enough now. Let me conclude that it's above all a very interesting film with superb acting by Rockwell. I do however need to see this sucker again. I know what to expect now and then I can form a full opinion. Quite a thing though, this film. But what kind of thing?