Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]513071[/split]
There were a lot of games that Peyton played poorly. I don't want to derail this thread but needless to say, for the two rings he has, both were statistically his worst playoff performances of his career (sans the AFC championship against NE)
But the narrative that Peyton had no culpability for any of his playoff defeats is another thing he shares with LeBron. For years, YEARS, his teams were favored going into the playoffs to win it all. And somehow, he escaped a lot of criticism for a lot of blunders. There was always a reason other than the fact that sometimes you just need to make something happen.
The opening play against Seattle encapsulates Peyton's career to me in a nutshell. It's the Superbowl, and the first play of the game no less. Let your team get settled, run a routine play and just....play. Instead, he sees something, has to go through his audible routine and the center winds up screwing up. Is that all on Peyton? Of course not, just like it's not ALL on LeBron, but it sure as hell didn't help matters....
And he lost.Are you talking about Lebron of Peyton? Cause the only time Lebron was favorited in the finals was when they played the Mav, his first year with the Heat.
What years? I hear this alot, but what years were this and he dropped the ball? Like you just blamed him for a bad snap. Come on.
Are you talking about Lebron of Peyton? Cause the only time Lebron was favorited in the finals was when they played the Mav, his first year with the Heat.
The Colts always lost to the Pats. In the playoffs Peyton didn't even play them at home until the season they won the Super Bowl. So how was he favored? And if the were betting favorites, that was stupid. That is why the Colts were playing on the road.I'm blaming him for the mentality, the need to do that in the first play of the game. The obsessive need to control the whole offense, to not be able to step back and understand that maybe, just maybe, his guys haven't been there before twice like he was at that point.
As far as being favorites? Pretty much every time he played NE he was the favorite back then. People have revisionist history now about this, but nobody was claiming the Patriots were a great team until they won the 3rd title. At that point, a lot of media and fans saw them as lucky. The tuck rule, the field goals, a lot of luck. The team was comprised of a bunch of cast offs nobody wanted, and a Quarterback nobody thought much of.
I'm talking about Peyton there, but it applies to LeBron too. Once again, revisionist history. Let's not forget the last two years he was in Cleveland the first time, they had the best record both years. A lot of LeBron apologists act as if he did that alone, obviously I disagree, but ultimately, they were the favorites both years to at least get to the Finals. They were making commercials about him and Kobe playing in the Finals. It was a foregone conclusion that would happen for most people. And they flamed out to Orlando and Boston. Counting the Mavs Finals, that's three. OKC Finals was four. Both times against the Spurs, so that's 5 and 6 right there. The Spurs may have wiped the floor with Miami that 2nd time around, but most pundits thought the Heat would win.
The thing about those Cavs teams is they were built specifically around him. They were perfect in terms of complimenting him. When he left, of course they crumbled. Still, losing to the Magic team will always be a stain.Let's not pretend Lebron had a great team. Look at what their record was when he left. To compare, look at what the Bulls did when Jordan left the first time.
Lebron had nobody around him. He essentially did carry the team himself.
Let's not pretend Lebron had a great team. Look at what their record was when he left. To compare, look at what the Bulls did when Jordan left the first time.
Lebron had nobody around him. He essentially did carry the team himself.
The thing about those Cavs teams is they were built specifically around him. They were perfect in terms of complimenting him. When he left, of course they crumbled. Still, losing to the Magic team will always be a stain.
The Colts always lost to the Pats. In the playoffs Peyton didn't even play them at home until the season they won the Super Bowl. So how was he favored? And if the were betting favorites, that was stupid. That is why the Colts were playing on the road.
was Verejao traded or was he released and GS picked him up?
was Verejao traded or was he released and GS picked him up?
There is an ocean of differences between a horrible team and having the Jordan Bulls. If the Cavs were really that awful, they wouldn't have won that many games. It wasn't like LeBron went to the Heat and started winning more games.Oh come on guys, you're going to try and compare the players that left the Cav's with Lebron to the supporting cast Jordan had? Look, I get it if you don't like Lebron, I'm not a huge fan either, but fact being it was't a good team without him. Jordan had (ignoring some of his other support) two other superstars on his team. One of whom had already won two rings and had beat him in the Eastern Finals. So let's not try and act like Lebron had a great supporting cast.
Trying to pretend Lebron had a decent team is revisionist history at the highest.
Just like the Lakers and Thunder were favored to beat Dallas and lost. At some point, it might be time to admit the Mavs were the best team that year. The pundits were wrong about them every single time. And it's not like the NFL where you can get hot for a few games and win the championship. In the NBA, you gotta win a series and it takes a team to do that.Are you talking about Lebron of Peyton? Cause the only time Lebron was favorited in the finals was when they played the Mav, his first year with the Heat.
And he lost.![]()
Holy smokes! We can agree about something!I'm blaming him for the mentality, the need to do that in the first play of the game. The obsessive need to control the whole offense, to not be able to step back and understand that maybe, just maybe, his guys haven't been there before twice like he was at that point.
You put a lot of stock in what "pundits" think. Those pundits are wrong a lot. They thought the Mavs would lose to the Blazers, Lakers, Thunder, and Heat in 2011 and were wrong each time.Lebron shall not be praised in my presence! said:The Spurs may have wiped the floor with Miami that 2nd time around, but most pundits thought the Heat would win.
That's how sports works. Fans always blame a player they don't like for every loss and give credit to their teams if they win.Oh come on guys, you're going to try and compare the players that left the Cav's with Lebron to the supporting cast Jordan had? Look, I get it if you don't like Lebron, I'm not a huge fan either, but fact being it was't a good team without him. Jordan had (ignoring some of his other support) two other superstars on his team. One of whom had already won two rings and had beat him in the Eastern Finals. So let's not try and act like Lebron had a great supporting cast.
Trying to pretend Lebron had a decent team is revisionist history at the highest.
aw man, where did the lebron son go?
I'm blaming him for the mentality, the need to do that in the first play of the game. The obsessive need to control the whole offense, to not be able to step back and understand that maybe, just maybe, his guys haven't been there before twice like he was at that point.
As far as being favorites? Pretty much every time he played NE he was the favorite back then. People have revisionist history now about this, but nobody was claiming the Patriots were a great team until they won the 3rd title. At that point, a lot of media and fans saw them as lucky. The tuck rule, the field goals, a lot of luck. The team was comprised of a bunch of cast offs nobody wanted, and a Quarterback nobody thought much of.
I'm talking about Peyton there, but it applies to LeBron too. Once again, revisionist history. Let's not forget the last two years he was in Cleveland the first time, they had the best record both years. A lot of LeBron apologists act as if he did that alone, obviously I disagree, but ultimately, they were the favorites both years to at least get to the Finals. They were making commercials about him and Kobe playing in the Finals. It was a foregone conclusion that would happen for most people. And they flamed out to Orlando and Boston. Counting the Mavs Finals, that's three. OKC Finals was four. Both times against the Spurs, so that's 5 and 6 right there. The Spurs may have wiped the floor with Miami that 2nd time around, but most pundits thought the Heat would win.
Bosh is a great player. Go look at the stats. The dude was the reason why LeBron and Wade worked.
By the way, LeBron has consistently chosen his teammates the last 6 years, so lets not act like he was forced into any situation. People acting like he didn't go down to Miami because he couldn't win in Cleveland and then left when he thought he couldn't win in Miami anymore.![]()
The lebron son wasn't supposed to come back here until June. He showed up a day early and paid the price!